Change of the Result Value by the Amount of Samples in CA 19-9

CA 19-9 검체량에 따른 농도의 변화

  • Chang, Hyun-Yeong (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Hee-Won (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • You, Tae-Min (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Noh, Kyung-Woon (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Joo (Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • 장현영 (서울대학교병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 박희원 (서울대학교병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 유태민 (서울대학교병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 노경운 (서울대학교병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 김현주 (서울대학교병원 핵의학과)
  • Received : 2007.10.08
  • Accepted : 2007.10.25
  • Published : 2008.05.11

Abstract

Purpose: CA 19-9 need to examine a number of sample volume, and the postwar 200 U/ml concentration hook effect appears slight. Thus, the antibody-antigen reaction, and by reducing the amount of (sample volume), they can hook effect to minimize the impact of the sample volume and relevance know, I saw the hook effect. In addition, the current maximum of using the standard concentration of the reagent in 240 U/ml increase more than the standard concentration can be seen knows. Material and Method: 5 U/ml and under, make a few low concentration of serum pool from the high concentration of the sample hook effect together with a standard concentration of about 500 to meet the production. The reagents used in experiments are currently using SNUH NM experiment. Orignal method along with the experiment is to 25 ul sample volume (1 / 4), 50 ul (1 / 2), 100 ul (Orignal method) in the experiment. My greatest concentration of the reagent concentration of approximately two times the standard concentration of production. When was the last to make the first experiment, as measured by the standard concentration after that. The new inspection information through a standard solution modified by entering values in them. Results: 100 ul, and to apply the new standard concentration y = 1.3021x - 10.97, $R^2$ = 0.9844. Overall, the results showed a similar orignal method. Because of the concentration in the value of more than 240 U/ml, but it is an overall value that can be made out of a similar value When I put the 50 ul y = 1.045x + 9.5861, $R^2$ = 0.9428. Overall orignal method and the results of a similar value. 50 ul, and to apply the new standard concentration y=1.2006x+11.252, $R^2$=0.9423. Showing a slightly lower value compared with orignal method. Because of the concentration in the value of more than 240 U/ml, but it is an overall value that can be made out of a similar value. When I put the man 25 ul y=0.6012x+24.755, $R^2$=0.4033. Results showed that very small amounts of sample are insecure inside and showed a lower middle cpm orignal method and showed a lot of mismatched. Conclusions: 25 ul of the sample volume is not possible to use the instability had, when I put the 50 ul of the orignal method can be used to show a similar concentration. The new values are slightly lower concentration, The new values are slightly lower concentration, concentration, which are likely due to the lack of data has had a little gap between the sample showed 80 to 200 U/ml additional experiments seem to do. Apply a new 100 ul concentration values are applied to a large crowd is not even in sight. But this way the concentration of 100 to more 400 U/ml gather further experiments should possible adds.

Keywords