Application of Functional Carbohydrates as a Substitute for Inorganic Polyphosphate in Pork Meat Processing

돈육 가공에서 기능성 탄수화물을 이용한 인산염 대체 소재 개발

  • Park, Ki-Soo (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Choi, Yang-Il (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hwa (Department of Food & Nutrition, Seowon University, Bioorganic Materials & Food Center, Seowon University) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Hee (Doorae Food Limited) ;
  • Auh, Joong-Hyuck (Department of Food Science & Technology, Chung-Ang University)
  • 박기수 (충북대학교 축산학과) ;
  • 최양일 (충북대학교 축산학과) ;
  • 이상화 (서원대학교 식품영양학과, 서원대학교 친환경바이오소재 및 식품 지역기술혁신센터) ;
  • 김종희 ((합)두레식품) ;
  • 어중혁 (중앙대학교 식품공학과)
  • Published : 2008.02.28

Abstract

Guar gum, ${\kappa}$-carrageenan, alginic acid and chitosan were applied to pork as a model system, and evaluated as a substitute for inorganic polyphosphate, which is one of the essential additives in conventional meat processing. The tested materials did not alter the fat content or pH of the pork meat; however, they did affect water holding capacity and cooking loss significantly. The pork with added guar gum and ${\kappa}$-carrageenan exhibited lower cooking loss than the pork with added polyphosphate. Also, theses materials showed no negative coloring effect within the pork meat blends, which suggest the possibility for their application in final products. In addition, the pork processed with guar gum showed a similar emulsion stability to that with polyphosphate. Overall, guar gum and ${\kappa}$-carrageenan were confirmed as possible substitutes for inorganic polyphosphate.

본 연구는 소금의 첨가수준을 저수준(1.5%)으로 고정시키고, 인산염 대체가능성이 있는 다양한 기능성 소재들의 수준을 달리하여 원료돈육의 가공특성, 유화안정성 및 육색 등에 미치는 첨가효과를 구명하였다. 기능성 물질의 첨가는 원료돈육의 일반성분과 pH에는 유의적인 영향을 미치지 않았다. 보수력과 가열 감량에 있어 후보 물질들과 인산염 처리구 간에 유의적인 변화가 나타났고, 구아검, 카라기난, 알긴산이 인산염 대체에 적적한 특성을 보였다. 유화안정성에서는 인산염, 알긴산과 구아검 첨가구가 유의적으로 높은 안정성을 나타냈어 이후 실제 가공품에의 적용가능성을 나타냈다. 이상의 결과에서 카라기난과 구아검의 경우인산염과 유사한 가공특성, 유화안정성과 육색을 나타내어 육제품 제조용 인산염 대체첨가물질로 가능성을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Sloan AE. The top ten functional food trends. Food Technol. 54: 33-62 (2000)
  2. Law N, Frost C, Wald N. By How much dose dietary salt reduction lower blood pressure. I-Analysis of observational data among populations. Brit. Med. J. 302: 811-815 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.302.6780.811
  3. Tuomilehto J, Jousiliahti P, Rastenyte D, Moltchanov V, Tanskanen A, Pietinen P, Nissinen A. Urinary sodium excertion and cadiovscular mortality in Finland: A prospective study. Lancet 357: 848-851 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04199-4
  4. Ruusunen M, Vainiopaa J, Puolanne E, Lyly M, Lahteenmaki L, Niemisto M, Ahvenainen R. Physical and sensory properties of low-salt phosphate-free frankfurters composed with various ingredients. Meat Sci. 63: 9-16 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00044-X
  5. Kemi VE, Kärkkäinen MU, Lamberg-Allardt CJ. High phosphorus intakes acutely and negatively affect Ca and bone metabolism in a dose-dependent manner in healthy young females. Brit. J. Nutr. 96: 545-552 (2006)
  6. Shahidi F, Synowiecki J. Protein hydrolyzates from seal meat as phosphate alternatives in food processing applications. Food Chem. 60: 29-32 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(96)00296-8
  7. Atughonu AG, Zayas JF, Heralds TJ, Harbers LH. Thermo-rheology, quality characteristics, and microstructure of frankfurters prepared with selected plant and milk additives. J. Food Quality 21: 223-238 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.1998.tb00518.x
  8. Rhee KC. Functionality of soy proteins. pp. 311-324. In: Protein Functionality in Food Systems. Hettiarachchy NS, Zieger GR (eds). Marcel Dekker, New York, USA (1994)
  9. Lyons PH, Kerry JF, Morrissey PA, Buckley DJ. The influence of added whey protein/carrageenan gels and tapioca starch on the textural properties of low fat pork sausages. Meat Sci. 51: 43-52 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00095-3
  10. Shand PJ, Sofos JN, Schmidt GR. Properties of algin/calcium and salt/phosphate structured beef rolls with added gums. J. Food Sci. 58: 1223-1230 (1993)
  11. Foegeding EA, Ramsey SR. Effect of gums on low-fat meat batters. J. Food Sci. 51: 33-45 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb10829.x
  12. Jo C, Lee JW, Lee KH, Byun MW. Quality properties of pork sausage prepared with water-soluble chitosan oligomers. Meat Sci. 59: 369-375 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00089-4
  13. Lin KW, Chao JY. Quality characteristics of reduced-fat Chinesestyle sausage as related to chitosan's molecular weight. Meat Sci. 59: 343-351 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00084-5
  14. Sebranek JG, Trius A. Carrageenans and their use in meat products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 36: 69-85 (1996)
  15. Ulu H. Effects of carrageenam and guar gum on the cooking and textual properties of low fat meatballs. Food Chem. 95: 600-605 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.01.039
  16. Whistler RL, BeMiller JN. Carbohydrate Chemistry for Food Scientists. Eagan Press, St. Paul, MN, USA. pp. 187-216 (1997)
  17. NO HK, Meyers SP, Prinyawiwatkul W, Xu Z. Applications of chitosan for improvement of quality and shelf life of foods: A Review. J. Food Sci. 72: R87-R100 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00277.x
  18. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC Intl.. 16th ed. Method 39.1-39.23. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA (1995)
  19. Townsend WE, Witnauer LP, Riloff JA, Swift CE. Comminuted meat emulsions; differential thermal analysis of fat transitions. Food Technol.-Chicago 22: 319-323 (1968)
  20. Trout GR, Schmidt GR. Effect of phosphate type and concentration, salt level, and method of preparation on binding in restructured beef rolls. J. Food Sci. 49: 687-694 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb13189.x
  21. Trout GR, Smith GR. Water binding of meat products: Effect of fat level, effective salt concentration, and cooking temperature. J. Food Sci. 51: 1061-1062 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb11232.x