Effect of Cathodic Protection of Adjacent Steel Piles on the Life of Sacrificial Anode

희생양극의 수명에 미치는 인접 강파일의 음극방식 영향

  • Moon, Kyung-Man (Dept. of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Korea Maritime Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Hwan (Education and Research Division, Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology) ;
  • Cho, Hwang-Rae (Dept. of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Korea Maritime Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Myung-Hoon (Dept. of Marine System Engineering, Korea Maritime Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Yun-Hae (Dept. of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Korea Maritime Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Gyeong (Education and Research Division, Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology)
  • 문경만 (한국해양대학교 공과대학 기계소재공학부) ;
  • 이규환 (한국해양수산연수원 교육연구처) ;
  • 조황래 (한국해양대학교 공과대학 기계소재공학부) ;
  • 이명훈 (한국해양대학교 해사대학 기관시스템공학부) ;
  • 김윤해 (한국해양대학교 공과대학 기계소재공학부) ;
  • 김진경 (한국해양수산연수원 교육연구처)
  • Published : 2008.06.30

Abstract

There are two cases when the life of a sacrificial anode is shortened from the designed life: one case results from self-corrosion of the anode due to contamination by sea water in the other case, however, electrical current to protect some given steel piles overflows to protect other, adjacent non-protected steel piles. In this study, the variation of polarization potential of nine steel piles, being protected cathodically and with anode-producing current between anode and steel piles, was investigated. Parameters were varied, such as the eighth and ninth steel piles either connected electrically or not, and whether the ninth steel pile was protected by another sacrificial anode or not. The current produced by the sacrificial anode decreased when the ninth steel pile was cathodically protected by the anode of another pile. However, produced current increased when the ninth steel pile was not connected to another anode. The study concludes that the life of a sacrificial anode can be prolonged or shortened depending on whether adjacent steel piles are cathodically protected or not.

Keywords

References

  1. 문경만, 김기준, 이명훈 (1995). 강관구조물의 방식대책에 관한 연구, 해양수산부, pp. 379
  2. 문경만, 조황래, 이명훈, 김현명, 이인원, 전호환(2007). '중방식도료의 내식성에 미치는 첨가제의 영향', 한국해양공학회지, 제21권, 제3호, pp 65-67
  3. 전대희 (1985). 부식과 방식의 관리, 一中, pp 393-409
  4. Baeckmman, W.V. Schwenk, W. and Prinz, W. (1997). Handbook of Cathodic Corrosion Protection, Gulf Publishing, pp 367-389
  5. Boening, D. (1976). 'Offshore Cathodic Protection Experience and Economic Reassessment', Paper 2702, presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, May
  6. Compton, K.G. (1961). 'Factor Involved in Corrosion of Lead Cable Sheath', CORROSION, Vol 17, pp 115-118
  7. Gartland, P.O., Bardel, E. Andresen, R.E. and Johnson, R. (1984). 'Effect of Flow on the Cathodic Protection of a Steel Cylinder in Sea Water', CORROSION, Vol 40, No 3, pp 127-133 https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3593927
  8. Hartt, W.H. and Lemieux, E. (1999). 'A Principle Determination in Cathodic Protection Design of Offshore Structures', Corrosion 99, Paper No. 627
  9. Morgan, J. H. (1987). Cathodic Protection, 2nd edition NACE, pp 257-360
  10. Newman, J. (1991). 'Cathodic Protection with Parrel Cylinders', J. Electrochem Soc., Vol 130, No 12, pp 3554-3559
  11. Strommen, R. (1982). 'Computer Modeling of Offshore Cathodic Protection Systems Utilized in CP Monitoring', Paper 4367, presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, May
  12. Talati, J.D., Patel, G.A. and Gandhi, D.K. (1984). 'Maximum Utilization Current Density', CORROSION, Vol 40, No 2, pp 88-91 https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3593921
  13. Wagner, J. (1992). 'Cathodic Protection Design I', NACE International, pp 3-28