Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

The effects of Hydroxyapatite nano-coating implants on healing of surgically created circumferential gap in dogs

  • Chae, Gyung-Joon (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lim, Hyun-Chang (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Jung-Yoo (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chung, Sung-Min (Dentium(R)) ;
  • Lee, In-Seop (Institute of Physics & Applied Physics, and Atomic-scale Surface Science Research Center, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • Published : 2008.08.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the healing response of various Hydroxyapatite(HA) coated dental implants by Ion-Beam Assisted Deposition(IBAD) placed in the surgically created circumferential gap in dogs. Materials and methods: In four mongrel dogs, all mandibular premolars and the first molar were extracted. After an 8 weeks healing period, six submerged type implants were placed and the circumferential cylindrical 2mm coronal defects around the implants were made surgically with customized step drills. Groups were divided into six groups : anodized surface, anodized surface with 150nm HA and heat treatment, anodized surface with 300nm HA and heat treatment, anodized surface with 150nm HA and no heat treatment, and anodized surface with 150nm HA, heat treatment and bone graft, anodized surface with bone graft. The dogs were sacrificed following 12 weeks healing period. Specimens were analyzed histologically and histomorphometrically. Results: During the healing period, healing was uneventful and implants were well maintained. Anodized surface with HA coating and $430^{\circ}C$ heat treatment showed an improved regenerative characteristics. Most of the gaps were filled with newly regenerated bone. The implant surface was covered with bone layer as base for intensive bone formation and remodeling. In case that graft the alloplastic material to the gaps, most of the coronal gaps were filled with newly formed bone and remaining graft particles. The bone-implant contact and bone density parameters showed similar results with the histological findings. The bone graft group presented the best bone-implant contact value which had statistical significance. Conclusion: Within the scope of this study, nano-scale HA coated dental implants appeared to have significant effect on the development of new bone formation. And additional bone graft is an effective method in overcoming the gaps around the implants.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson T, Jansson T, Lekholm U. Osseointegrated dental implants. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:151-74.
  2. Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of commercially pure niobium and titanium implants in rabbit bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:24-29. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020103.x
  3. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, et al. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  4. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, et al. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-619.
  5. Cochran DL, Simpson J, Weber HP, Buser D. Attachment and growth of periodontal cells on smooth and rough titanium Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:289-297.
  6. McGlumphy EA, Peterson LJ, Larsen PE, Jeffcoat MK. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:82-92.
  7. Thomas KA, Kay JF, Cook SD, Jarcho M. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histologic profiles of titanium implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:1395-1414. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820211205
  8. Biesbrock AR, Edgerton M. Evaluation of the clinical predictability of hydroxyapatite-coated endosseous dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:712-720.
  9. Hanisch O, Cortella CA, Boskovic MM, et al. Experimental peri-implant tissue breakdown around hydroxyapatite-coated implants. J Periodontol 1997;68:59-66. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.1.59
  10. Liao H, Fartash B, Li J. Stability of hydroxyapatite-coatings on titanium oral implants (IMZ). 2 retrieved cases. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:68-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00009.x
  11. Jeffcoat MK, McGlumphy EA, Reddy MS, et al. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:406-410.
  12. Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. A pilot study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5: 202-206. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050402.x
  13. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:442-447. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080601.x
  14. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1567-1575. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820291213
  15. Block MS, Gardiner D, Kent JN, et al. Hydroxyapatite- coated cylindrical implants in the posterior mandible: 10-year observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11: 626-633.
  16. Sul YT, Johansson C, Wennerberg A, et al. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:349-359.
  17. Oonishi H, Hench LL, Wilson J, et al. Comparative bone growth behavior in granules of bioceramic materials of various sizes. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;44:31-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199901)44:1<31::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-9
  18. Ong JL, Bessho K, Cavin R, Carnes DL. Bone response to radio frequency sputtered calcium phosphate implants and titanium implants in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59: 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1232
  19. ter Brugge PJ, Jansen JA. Initial interaction of rat bone marrow cells with non-coated and calcium phosphate coated titanium substrates. Biomaterials 2002;23:3269-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00085-6
  20. Akimoto K, Becker W, Persson R, et al. Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14: 351-360.
  21. Knox R, Caudill R, Meffert R. Histologic evaluation of dental endosseous implants placed in surgically created extraction defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1991; 11:364-375.
  22. Werbitt MJ, Goldberg PV. The immediate implant: bone preservation and bone regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:206-217.
  23. Becker W, Dahlin C, Becker BE, et al. The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: a prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:31-40.
  24. Lang NP, Bragger U, Hammerle CH, Sutter F. Immediate transmucosal implants using the principle of guided tissue regeneration. I. Rationale, clinical procedures and 30-month results. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:154-163. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050306.x
  25. Cornell CN, Lane JM. Current understanding of osteoconduction in bone regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998:S267-273.
  26. Schopper C, Ziya-Ghazvini F, Goriwoda W, et al. HA/TCP compounding of a porous CaP biomaterial improves bone formation and scaffold degradation--a long-term histological study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;74: 458-467.