Effects of Cone Number and Thinning on Nutrient Content in Needles of Korean Pine (Pinus koraiensis)

  • Han, Sim-Hee (Forest Seed Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, In-Sik (Forest Seed Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Suk (Forest Seed Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Su (Forest Seed Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Jang, Kyung Hwan (Forest Seed Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Tae Dong (College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2008.06.17
  • Accepted : 2008.06.26
  • Published : 2008.10.31

Abstract

We investigated on the distribution of nutrient contents (N. P and K) in current and one-year old needles of Korean pine, Pinus koraiensis, to understand the physiological effects of alternate bearing. One experimental set was designed with three types of cone number (one, three and five) under natural state and cone number of another one was controlled by thinning. Test samples were separated to collect into three fractions; current needles on the shoot and one-year old needles above and under the cone. On the branch without cone, N, P and K concentrations in needles on the shoot were higher than those in needles of one-year old branch. At natural state, needle P concentration was the lowest in needles on the five-cone branch in August. Macronutrient concentrations were the lowest in needles above the cone, which was remarkably observed in needle K concentration. Under cone thinning, N. P and K concentrations were the highest in needles on one-cone branch and the lowest in needles on five-cone branch. Needle nutrient concentrations were the lowest in needles above the cone, which was remarkably observed in the needle on five-cone branch. In conclusion, the current needles of the shoot and cones are a strong sink of nutrient like N. P and K, and the increase of cone number influences nutrient removal from needles.

Keywords

References

  1. Balasubrahmanyam, V.R., Eifert, J. and Dofasi, L. 1978. Nutrient reserves in grapevine canes as influenced by cropping levels. Vitis 17: 23-29.
  2. Bingham, F.T. 1961. Seasonal trends in nutrient composition of Hass avocado trees. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 78: 149-160.
  3. Broschat, T.K. 1997. Nutrient distribution, dynamics, and sampling in coconut and Canary Island date palms. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 122: 884-890.
  4. Brown, P.H. 1994. Seasonal variations in fig (Ficus carica L.) leaf nutrient concentrations. HortScience 29: 871-873.
  5. Brown, P.H., Weinbaum, S.A. and Picchioni, G.A. 1995. Alternate bearing influences annual nutrient consumption and the total nutrient content of mature pistachio trees. Trees 9: 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02418205
  6. Embleton, T.W. and Jones, W.W. 1966. Avocado and mango. pp. 51-76. In: Childers, N.F. (Ed.) Fruit Nutrition, Horticultural Publications. Rutgers University, NJ.
  7. Embleton, T.W., Jones, W.W., Labanauskas, C.K. and Reuther, W. 1973. Leaf analysis as a diagnostic tool and guide to fertilization. pp. 183-210. In: Reuther, W. (Ed.), The Citrus Industry, vol. III, University of California, Berkeley. CA.
  8. Fahmy, I. and Nasrallah, S. 1959. Changes in macronutrient elements of Souri olive leaves in alternate bearing years. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science 74: 304-307.
  9. Fernndez-Escobar, R., Moreno, R. and Garca-Creus, M. 1999. Seasonal changes of mineral nutrients in olive leaves during the alternate-bearing cycle. Scientia Horticulture 82: 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(99)00045-X
  10. Ingels, C., Geisel, P.M., Unruh, C.L. and Lawson, P.M. 2001. Fruit trees: thinning young fruit. ANR publication 8047 pp. 1-4.
  11. Korea Forest Service. 1999. Forestry Statistics. Korea (in Korean).
  12. Mirov, N.T. 1967. The Genu Pinus. Ronald, New York.
  13. Monselise, S.P. and Goldschmidt, E.E. 1982. Alternate bearing in fruit trees. Horticultural Reviews 5: 128-173.
  14. Monselise, S.P., Goldschmidt, E.E., Golomb, A. and Rolf, R. 1983. Alternate bearing in citrus: long-term effects of a single girdling treatment on individual 'Michal' tangerine branches. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 108: 373-376.
  15. Moreno, J. and Garca-Martnez, J.L. 1984. Nitrogen accumulation and mobilization in Citrus leaves throughout the annual cycle. Physiologia Plantarum 61: 429-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1984.tb06351.x
  16. Murphy, J. and Riley, J.P. 1962. A modified single solutions method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27: 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5
  17. Priestly, G.A. 1977. The annual turnover resources in young olive trees. Journal of Horticultural Science 52: 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1977.11514736
  18. Proietti, P. 2000. Effect of fruiting on leaf gas exchange in olive (Olea europaea L.). Photosynthetica 38: 397-402. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010973520871
  19. Proietti, P., Famiami, F. and Tombesi, A. 1999. Gas exchange in olive fruit. Photosynthetica 36: 423-432. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007028220042
  20. Proietti, P. and Tombesi, A. 1996. Translocation of assimilates and source-sink influences on productive characteristics of the olive tree. Advances in Horticultural Science 10: 11-14.
  21. Rallo, L. and Suarez, M.P. 1989. Seasonal distribution of dry matter within the olive fruit-bearing limb. Advances in Horticultural Science 3: 55-59.
  22. Roussos, P.A. and Pontikis, C.A. 2004. The role of free polyamines in the alternate-bearing of pistachio (Pistacia vera cv. Pontikis). Trees 18: 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-003-0281-z
  23. Ryugo, K. 1988. Fruit Culture, Its Science and Art. Wiley, New York.
  24. Shear, C.B. and Faust, M. 1980. Nutritional ranges in deciduous tree fruits and nuts. Horticultural Reviews 23: 142-163.
  25. Stephan, M., Bangerth, F. and Schneider, G. 1999. Quantification of endogenous gibberellins in exudates from fruit of Malus domestica. Plant Growth Regulation 28: 55-58. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006211309707
  26. Stutte, G.W. and Martin G.C. 1986. Effect of light intensity and carbohydrate reserves on flowering in olive. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 11: 27-31.
  27. Ulger, S., Sonmez, S., Karkacier, M. Ertoy, N., Akdesir, O. and Aksu, M. 2004. Determination of endogenous hormones, sugar and mineral nutrition levels during the induction, initiation and differentiation stage and their effects on flower formation in olive. Plant Growth Regulation 42: 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GROW.0000014897.22172.7d
  28. Untiedt, R. and Blanke, M. 2001. Effects of fruit thinning agents on apple tree canopy photosynthesis and dark respiration. Plant Growth Regulation 35: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013894901621
  29. Vidakovic, M. 1991. Conifers: Morphology and Variation. Crafickizavod Hrvatske, Croatia.
  30. Weinbaum, S.A., Niederholzer, F.J.A., Ponchner, S.W., Rosecrance, R.C., Carlson, R.M., Whittlesey, A.C. and Muraoka, T.T. 1994. Nutrient uptake by cropping and defruited field-grown 'French' prune trees. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 119: 925-930.