A Comparative Study on Traditional Medicine in Korea and China;Administrative Structure, Role and Function

한의학과 중의학 담당행정조직의 기능과 역할 비교 연구

  • Oh, Chae-Kun (Dept. of Korean Medical Classics, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon Univ.) ;
  • Yoon, Tae-Hyung (Dept. of Health Science, Graduate School, Hanyang Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Yoon-Shin (Dept. of Health Science, Graduate School, Hanyang Univ., Dept. of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang Univ.) ;
  • Park, Hae-Mo (Dept. of Oriental Preventive Medicine, College of Oriental Medicine, SangJi Univ.)
  • 오재근 (대전대학교 한의과대학 원전의사학교실) ;
  • 윤태형 (한양대학교 대학원 보건학과) ;
  • 김윤신 (한양대학교 대학원 보건학과,한양대학교 의과대학 산업의학교실) ;
  • 박해모 (상지대학교 한의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Published : 2008.09.30

Abstract

Because of the changes of a variety of aspects of disease theory alternative to standard medicine, demand for traditional medicine has increased. This study was undertaken to grasp and compare traditional-medicine administrative structure, functions and role between Korea and China. According to our research, both nations promote policy related to traditional-medicine, yet there are various differences because of each nation's scale, political structure, medical system, etc. Especially, compare to the Korean government, the Chinese government not only has paid more attention to traditional medicine but also established and promoted a synthesis development strategy for a long time. Additionally, there is weakness in Korea's traditional medicine policy compared to the Chinese's Synthetic development-strategy, which is the Oriental-policy Department and Korea Food&Drug administration. Therefore, to make up for the weakness, they will have to organize their role better and make a long-term development-strategy plan for traditional medicine.

Keywords