Community Composition on Stream Benthic Macroinvertebrate in Daegu

대구 일대 하천 저서성 대형무척추동물의 수계별 군집구성

  • Kwak, Inn-Sil (Faculty of Marine Technology, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Sun-Ae (Faculty of Marine Technology, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Gyeong-Suk (Faculty of Marine Technology, Chonnam National University)
  • 곽인실 (전남대학교 해양기술학부) ;
  • 정선애 (전남대학교 해양기술학부) ;
  • 정경숙 (전남대학교 해양기술학부)
  • Published : 2008.03.30

Abstract

The benthic macroinvertebrates of stream around Mt. Innae, Mt. Gumi and Mt. Dodung in Daegu were studied between April and September in 2005. Physico-chemical factors such as depth, velocity, pH, conductivity and DO were measured in each study site. The depth distributed from 3.3 cm to 18.6 cm, conductivity from 35.5 to 223.1${\mu}s$, and DO between 5.66 and 10.73$mgL^{-1}$. Total observed species of benthic macroinvertebrates were 78 in study streams. The first dominant family was Chironomidae, occupying from 59 to 65%. The other dominant families were Ephemeroptera (12$\sim$19%) and Gastropoda (5$\sim$14%). Mt. Innae was observed as having the most abundance species. EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) richness were from 4 to 14.

영천, 경주 지역의 도덕산, 구미산, 인내산 주위의 주요 수계 하천의 중 상류 11$\sim$12개 지점에서 저서성 대형 무척추동물을 조사하였다. 수심, 유속, pH, 탁도(NTU), 전기전도도와 DO 등의 이화학적 환경도 측정하였다. 수심은 3.3$\sim$18.6 cm, 전기전도도는 35.5$\sim$223.1${\mu}s$, DO는 5.66$\sim$10.73 $mgL^{-1}$의 분포를 보였다. 대상 조사지점에서 총 78종이 출현하였으며, 수서곤충이 주로 채집되었다. 깔따구류가 전 출현개체수의 59$\sim$65%를 차지하여 가장 많이 조사되었으며, 다음으로는 하루살이류가 12$\sim$19%, 달팽이류가 5$\sim$14%를 차지한 것으로 조사되었다. 조사지점 중에서는 인내산이 가장 다양한 생물이 서식한 것으로 조사되었다. EPT 풍부도는 4$\sim$14로 나타났으며 인내산의 IN2, IN3지점에서 14를 보여 가장 높게 나타난 반면 가장 낮게 나타난 곳은 도덕산의 DD2, DD4지점으로 조사되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. APHA, AWWA and WPCF. 1985. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste (16th ed.)
  2. Brigham AR, WU Brigham and A Gnilka. 1982. Aquatic Insects and Oligochaetes of North and South Carolina. Midwest Aquatic Enterprise. Mahomet. 837pp
  3. Brinkhust RO. 1986. Guide to the freshwater aquatic microdrive Oligochaetes of North America. Canadian Special Publication of Fidheries and Aquatic Sciences. 259pp
  4. Boulton AJ and PS Lake. 1992. The ecology of two intermittent streams in Victoria, Australia. III. Temporal changes in faunal composition. Freshw. Biol. 27:123-138 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00528.x
  5. Brooks SS and AJ Boulton. 1991. Recolonization dynamics of benthic macroinvertebrates after artificial and natural disturbances in an Australian temporary stream. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 42:295-308 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF9910295
  6. Cobb GG, TD Galloway and JF Flannagan. 1992. Effects of discharge and substrate stability on density and species composition of stream insects. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49:1788-1795 https://doi.org/10.1139/f92-198
  7. Dudley TL, CM D'antonio and SD Cooper. 1990. Mechanisms and consequences of interspecific competition between two stream insects. J. Anim. Ecol. 59:849-866 https://doi.org/10.2307/5018
  8. Gray LJ and SG Fisher. 1981. Postflood recolonization pathways of macroinvertebrates in a lowland Sonsran Desert stream. Am. Midl. Nat. 106:249-257 https://doi.org/10.2307/2425161
  9. Grimm NB and SG Fisher. 1989. Stability of periphyton and macroinvertebrates to disturbance by flash floods in a desert stream. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 8:293-307 https://doi.org/10.2307/1467493
  10. Hellawell JM. 1986. Biological indicators of freshwater pollution and environmental management. Elsevier applied science publishers, London. 546pp
  11. Merritt RW and KW Cummins. 1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Hunt Publishing Company, Dubugue. 722pp
  12. Minshall GW and RC Peterson. 1985. Towards a theory of macroinvertebrate community structure in stream ecosystems. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie. 104:49-76
  13. Pennak RW. 1978. Fresh-water invertebrates of the united States. John Wieley &Sons, Inc., New York. 803pp
  14. Power ME, RJ Stout, CE Cushing, PP Harper, FR Hauer, WJ Matthews, PB Moyle, B Statzner and IR Wais De Badgen. 1988. Biotic and abiotic controls in river and stream communities. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 7:456-479 https://doi.org/10.2307/1467301
  15. Reice SR, RC Wissmar and RJ Naiman. 1990. Disturbance regimes, resilience and recovery of animal communities and habitats in lotic ecosystems. Environ. Manage. 14:647-659 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394715
  16. Resh VH, AV Brown, AP Covich, ME Gurtz, HW Li, GW Minshall, SR Reice, AL Sheldon, JB Wallace and RC Wissmar. 1988. The role of disturbance in stream ecology. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 7:433-455 https://doi.org/10.2307/1467300
  17. Robertson AL, J Lancaster and AG Hildrew. 1995. Stream hydraulics and the distribution of macrocrustacea: a role for refugia? Freshw. Biol. 33:469-484 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1995.tb00407.x
  18. Sousa WP. 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 15: 353-391 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002033
  19. Stanly EH and SG Fisher. 1992. Intermittency, disturbance, and stability in stream ecosystems. pp. 271-280. In Robarts, RD and ML Bothwell (editors). Aquatic ecosystems in semi-arid regions: implications for resource management. National Hydrology Research Institute Symposium Series 7, Environment Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
  20. Wallace JB. 1990. Recovery of lotic macroinvertebrate communities from disturbance. Environ. Manage. 14:605-620 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394712
  21. Wiederholm T. 1983. Chironomidae of the Holactic region. Keys and diagnoses. (Part 1. Larvae). Ent. Scand. Suppl. 19. 457pp
  22. Williams DD and HBN Hynes. 1976. The ecology of temporary streams I. The fauna of two Canadian streams. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie. 61:761-787 https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.19760610604
  23. Yun IB. 1988. Illustrated encyclopedia of fauna and flora of Korea Vol. 30. (Aquatic insects), Ministry of Education, Seoul. 840pp