A Study of Hierarchical Characteristics by the Spatial Compositions and the Forms of Activity Areas in Nursing Facilities for the Elderly

노인요양시설 활동공간의 구성유형과 형태별 위계적 특성 연구

  • Lee, Min-Ah (Housing & Interior Design Major, Kunsan National Univ.)
  • 이민아 (군산대학교 생활과학부 주거 및 실내계획)
  • Published : 2008.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide basic information about design guidelines of activity areas in elderly nursing facilities. For the study, the activity areas of 44 facilities in Korea were investigated to categorize their spatial compositions and forms, and then a case study about 19 facilities was conducted to analyse their hierarchical characteristics. The results of the study were as follows: First, the major type of spatial composition among 44 research facilities was concentration, but compartment type was the main among unit-care facilities. By the year, all the types of spatial composition were evenly distributed during recent five years, while concentration type was about 40% before 2003. Second, the major form of activity areas was hall or corridor extension for large group. But there was more alcove or separation form among small group spaces. Third, in the case analysis about hierarchical characteristics, hall and corridor extension form met the requirements of accessibility and openness of public and semi-public areas. On the other hand, separation form had a problem in satisfying both requirements. The semi-private areas, which were around the elderly bedrooms and the elderly were able to watch activities in, were not sufficient in many facilities. Fourth, the division of public and semi-public area was mainly by furniture, and the individuality of semi-private area was defined by dead-end place and corner seats of the window or the corridor. The diversity of semi-private area was likely to be appeared in connection or distribution type. On the basis of the results, the basic design guidelines for activity areas in elderly nursing facilities could be suggested as follows: On the whole, connection or distribution type in spatial composition is more efficient for hierarchical flow than concentration or compartment type is, especially in Korean facilities having many elderly residents per floor. In detail, the design of public and semi-public area should be focused on their openness and accessibility. The recommended forms of activity areas were hall or corridor extension in public area, and living room, corridor extension, or large corridor in semi-public area to effectively function as large or small group spaces. In semi-private areas, the spatial diversity and individuality should be considered.

Keywords

References

  1. 권순정.오은진.안희창(2006). 노인전문요양시설 건축모델 연구. 한국의료복지시설학회지, 12(1), 73-77
  2. 권순정.오종희(2004). 노인전문요양시설의 거주단위 모형개발에 관한 연구. 한국의료복지시설학회지, 10(2), 39-49
  3. 김민경(2005). 노인요양시설의 지역주민 커뮤니티 형성을 위한 건축계획에 관한 연구. 영남대 건축디자인대학원 석사학위논문
  4. 김민석(2005). 요양시설 데이룸의 노인행태와 사회성 공간규모에 관한 연구. 조선대 대학원 석사학위논문
  5. 김정한(1999). 치매노인요양시설의 건축계획에 관한 연구. 경남대 산업대학원 석사학위논문
  6. 류승수(2001). 치매전문요양시설에서의 치료적 건축환경계획을 위한 연구. 고려대 대학원 석사학위논문
  7. 민대홍(2005). 노인전문요양시설의 친교공간에 관한 연구. 서울시립대 대학원 석사학위논문
  8. 보건복지가족부 자료실. www.mw.go.kr
  9. 손수진.이특구(1999). 노인요양시설 주거부분 공유공간에 관한 연구. 한국의료복지시설학회지, 5(9), 37-45
  10. 송혜정(2002). 치매노인을 위한 그룹홈의 공간계획에 관한 연구. 홍익대 대학원 석사학위논문
  11. 오은진(2006). 노인수발보험제도 도입에 따른 노인복지서비스 환경의 변화. 건축 0611, 21-24
  12. 윤영선.변혜령(2004). 일본 노인전문요양시설 치매노인의 공용공간 이용 특성에 관한 연구. , 13(6), 184-195
  13. 이민아(2006). 프로그램 수행공간으로서 무료노인전문요양시설의 휴게홀 평가분석. 한국생활과학회지, 15(3), 513-525
  14. 이민아(2006). 노인전문요양시설 공용공간의 위계적 특성분석. 한국가정관리학회지, 24(6), 117-129
  15. 이민아(2007). 도시지역 대규모 노인전문요양시설 거주 및 간호단위의 공간구성 특성분석. 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 16(4), 54-61
  16. 이재모(2004). 일본 노인복지시설의 유니트케어 특성에 관한 연구. 한국의료복지시설학회지, 10(2), 83-89
  17. 이현정.민병호.권순정(2007). 일본 유니트케어의 도입배경과 건축적 특징에 관한 연구. 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 16(3), 93-101
  18. 임상식(2006). 노인요양시설의 소그룹화 경향에 관한 연구. 관동대 대학원 석사학위논문
  19. 정여주.최상현(2005). 치매노인 전문요양시설 거주공간디자인 지침에 관한 연구. 한국실내디자인학회논문집, 14(4), 70-78
  20. 최성형.김창국(2004). 노인간호 집합주거의 공용생활공간 계획연구. 한국주거학회논문집, 15(2), 1-9
  21. 최지혜.함욱.이낙운(2004). 노인요양시설의 거주공간 구성에 관한 연구. 한국의료복지시설학회지, 10(1), 47-57
  22. 한균.권순정(2005). 치매노인전문요양시설의 복도공간에 관한 건축계획적 연구. 한국의료복지시설학회지, 11(1). 69-76
  23. Brawley, E.C.(2006). Design innovations for aging and Alzheimer's. Ch. 12. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons, INC
  24. Cohen, U. & Weisman, G.D.(1991). Holding on to home. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press
  25. Howell, S.C.(1980). Designing for aging: Patterns of use. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
  26. Newman, O.(1996). Creating defensible space. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://www.huduser.org/publications/pdf/def.pdf
  27. Pinet, C.(1995). Nursing home design: Characteristics of social spaces and social behavior of residents. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
  28. Regnier, V.(2002). Design for assisted living. Ch.7 Stimulating social interaction. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons, INC
  29. Wikipedia. Defensible space theory. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensible_Space_Theory