DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Long Term Efficacy of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Standard Cages alone in Lumbar Disc Diseases Combined with Modic Changes

  • Kwon, Young-Min (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Spine Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chin, Dong-Kyu (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Spine Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jin, Byung-Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Spine Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Keun-Su (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Spine Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Eun (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Spine Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kuh, Sung-Uk (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Spine Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Published : 2009.10.28

Abstract

Objective : Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is considered to have the best theoretical potential in promoting bony fusion of unstable vertebral segments by way of a load sharing effect of the anterior column. This study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of PLIF with cages in chronic degenerative disc disease with Modic degeneration (changes of vertebral end plate). Methods : A total of 597 patients underwent a PLIF with threaded fusion cages (TFC) from 1993 to 2000. Three-hundred-fifty-one patients, who could be followed for more than 3 years, were enrolled in this study. Patients were grouped into 4 categories according to Modic classification (no degeneration : 259, type 1 : 26, type 2 : 55, type 3 : 11). Clinical and radiographic data were evaluated retrospectively. Results : The clinical success rate according to the Prolo's functional and economic outcome scale was 86% in patients without degeneration and 83% in patients with Modic degeneration. The clinical outcomes in each group were 88% in type 1, 84% in type 2, and 73% in type 3. The bony fusion rate was 97% in patients without degeneration and 83% in patients with Modic degeneration. The bony fusion rate in each group was 81% in type 1, 84% in type 2, and 55% in type 3. The clinical success and fusion rates were significantly lower in patients with type 3 degeneration. Conclusion : The PLIF with TFC has been found to be an effective procedure for lumbar spine fusion. But, the clinical outcome and bony fusion rates were significantly low in the patients with Modic type 3. The authors suggest that PLIF combined with pedicle screw fixation would be the better for them.

Keywords

References

  1. Albert HB, Manniche C : Modic changes following lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J 16 : 977-982, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0336-8
  2. Barrick WT, Schofferman JA, Reynolds JB, Goldthwaite ND, McKeehen M, Keaney D, et al. : Anterior lumbar fusion improves discogenic pain at levels of prior posterolateral fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 : 853-857, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200004010-00014
  3. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW : Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72 : 403-408, 1990
  4. Boos N, Rieder R, Schade V, Spratt KF, Semmer N, Aebi M : 1995 Volvo Award in Clinical Sciences. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception, and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disc herniations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 : 2613-2625, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199512150-00002
  5. Braithwaite I, White J, Saifuddin A, Renton P, Taylor BA : Vertebral end-plate (Modic) changes on lumbar spine MRI : correlation with pain reproduction at lumbar discography. Eur Spine J 7 : 363-368, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860050091
  6. Brisby H, Olmarker K, Larsson K, Nutu M, Rydevik B : Proinflammatory cytokines in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in patients with disc herniation and sciatica. Eur Spine J 11 : 62-66, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860100306
  7. Buttermann GR, Heithoff KB, Ogilvie JW, Transfeldt EE, Cohen M : Vertebral body MRI related to lumbar fusion results. Eur Spine J 6 : 115-120, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01358743
  8. Chataigner H, Onimus M, Polette A : [Surgery for degenerative lumbar disc disease. Should the black disc be grafted?] Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 84 : 583-589, 1998
  9. Fritzell P, H$\ddot{a}$gg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Sudy Group : 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies : Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain : a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26 : 2521-2532; discussion 2532-2534, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200112010-00002
  10. Groth AT, Kuklo TR, Klemme WR, Polly DW, Schroeder TM : Comparison of sagittal contour and posterior disc height following interbody fusion : threaded cylindrical cages versus structural allograft versus vertical cages. J Spinal Disord Tech 18 : 332-336, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000163037.17634.89
  11. Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS : Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 331 : 69-73, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199407143310201
  12. Lang P, Chafetz N, Genant HK, Morris JM : Lumbar spinal fusion. Assessment of functional stability with magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15 : 581-588, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199006000-00028
  13. Lee CK, Vessa P, Lee JK : Chronic disabling low back pain syndrome caused by internal disc derangements. The results of disc excision and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 : 356-361, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199502000-00018
  14. Lin PM, Cautilli RA, Joyce MF : Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res : 154-168, 1983
  15. Modic MT, Ross JS : Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Radiology 245 : 43-61, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2451051706
  16. Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR : Degenerative disk disease : assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology 166 : 193-199, 1988
  17. Mulholland RC, Sengupta DK : Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J 11 Suppl 2 : S198-S205, 2002
  18. Prolo DJ, Oklund SA, Butcher M : Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 11 : 601-606, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198607000-00012
  19. Ray CD : Threaded titanium cages for lumbar interbody fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22 : 667-679; discussion 679-680, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199703150-00019
  20. Stadnik TW, Lee RR, Coen HL, Neirynck EC, Buisseret TS, Osteaux MJ : Annular tears and disk herniation : prevalence and contrast enhancement on MR images in the absence of low back pain or sciatica. Radiology 206 : 49-55, 1998
  21. Sudo H, Oda I, Abumi K, Ito M, Kotani Y, Minami A : Biomechanical study on the effect of five different lumbar reconstruction techniques on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and lamina strain. J Neurosurg Spine 5 : 150-155, 2006 https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2006.5.2.150
  22. Takahashi H, Suguro T, Okazima Y, Motegi M, Okada Y, Kakiuchi T : Inflammatory cytokines in the herniated disc of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 : 218-224, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199601150-00011
  23. Toyone T, Takahashi K, Kitahara H, Yamagata M, Murakami M, Moriya H : Vertebral bone-marrow changes in degenerative lumbar disc disease. An MRI study of 74 patients with low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76 : 757-764, 1994
  24. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N : MR imaging of the lumbar spine : prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers. Radiology 209 : 661-666, 1998

Cited by

  1. Dynamic Stabilisation in the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease with Modic Changes vol.2013, pp.None, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/806267
  2. Influence of Alendronate and Endplate Degeneration to Single Level Posterior Lumbar Spinal Interbody Fusion vol.11, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2014.11.4.221
  3. Do Modic changes have an impact on clinical outcome in lumbar spine surgery? A systematic literature review vol.25, pp.11, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4609-y
  4. Effect of Preoperative Modic Change in the Outcome of Patients with Low Back Pain Following Posterior Spinal Fusion or Laminectomy vol.14, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.ajns_41_18
  5. Is the bone fusion affected by Modic-2 changes in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? vol.99, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000018597
  6. The influence of endplate (Modic) changes on clinical outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a Swiss prospective multicenter cohort study vol.29, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06364-0
  7. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of hybrid graft in patients with Modic changes undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion vol.16, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02652-7