DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study for Encouragement of Rublic System in Designing with Programming Classes

설계과목 프로그래밍 수업을 중심으로 루브릭 시스템 정착을 위한 연구

  • Published : 2009.11.30

Abstract

It is inevitable for college students to be confused when they first face university education, which requires them to be self-reliant and responsible, after finishing their course of education, which is passive under control of period and environment, in primary, middle, and high schools. Introduction to college courses, which require students to be subjective and responsible, to be taken after chronically and environmentally controlled primary and secondary education, are but confusing. In this stage, college education should provide ground for educational system so that students can escape from repetitively enforced way of studying of fixed curriculums and study creatively and subjectively while befitting each individual's aptitude. For instance, in programming classes in engineering school, students scholastic achievements are closely interrelated with the professor's educational principles. A change in method of education, from one previously focused on theoretical contents to one centered on practices and experiments, can reap good results. Also, as the need arose for introduction of practice-focused evaluation system, from recognition-centered professor evaluating system to enablement of actively developing creative and self-reliant way of learning, we applied the Rublic System. It is a feedback system that all or most students become the evaluators, of which the indicators of evaluation such as category, standard, and score are public. We have looked into whether or not there has been an improvement in GPAs of students, and if there exists an improvement then what efforts should be made to solidify the system.

기간 및 환경에 통제를 받는 수동적인 초중등교육과정을 마치고 자율과 책임이 수반되는 대학교육으로 전환은 매우 혼란스러울 수밖에 없다. 이때 대학교육은 정형화된 교과과정의 주입식 반복 교육에서 벗어나 적성의 적합성과 창의적이고 주도적인 학습을 전개할 수 있도록 교육시스템 제반이 구축되어 있어야 한다. 예로 공과대학 프로그래밍 교과는 가르치는 교수의 교육방식에 따라 학습자들의 교육성과는 매우 밀접한 상관관계를 갖게 된다. 과거 이론위주의 수업방식에서 실습 중심으로의 교육전환은 좋은 성과를 거둘 수 있다. 또한 창의적이고 자기주도적 학습을 활발하게 계발할 수 있도록 인지 중심의 교수주체평가제에서 수행중심 평가제 도입의 필요성이 대두됨에 따라 이를 위해 루브릭(Rublic) 시스템을 적용하였다. 평가항목 및 평가기준 그리고 평가점수 등의 평가지침이 공개된 상태에서 모든 학습자 또는 다수로 구성된 교수평가를 피드백 하는 방식이다. 시스템적용 후 학습자의 학업성취도(GPA: Grade Point Average)가 향상되었는지 공인된 설문을 통해 알아보고 향상되었다면 시스템 정착을 위해 앞으로 어떠한 노력이 필요한지를 살펴보았다.

Keywords

References

  1. 노원경, 강소연."학습전략교육프로그램에서 루브릭 제시가 공과대학생의 학습전략과 학업성취도에 미치는 효과" 한국공학교육학회, 제 11권, 제 4호. 115-127쪽.2008 년, 12월
  2. 신명희, 노원경. "루브릭을 활용한 학습전략 교육 표로그램의 효과 검증" 한국교육심리학회, 제 22권, 제 4호. 671-695쪽.2008년. 12월
  3. 허돈. "공학교육인증의 학습성과 평가체계의 사례 연구" 한국공학교육학회, 제 12권, 제 1호.57-63쪽.2009년.3월
  4. 양일호, 이효정, 이효녕, 조현준. "과학적 논증과정 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발." 한국과학교육학회지, 제 29권, 제 2호, 203-220쪽,2009년.4월
  5. Mansilla, V.B. et al., "Targeted Assessment Rubric: An Empirically Grounded Rubric for Interdisciplinary Writing," The Journal of higher education, Vol.80 No.3, p334-353, 2009, May/June https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0044
  6. American Moderate Casteen, J. et al. "Ditching the Rubric on Gun Control: Notes from an American Moderate," The VIrginia quarterly review, Vol. .80, No.4, p210-221. 2004, Fall
  7. Davidowitz, B. et al. ,"Development and application of a rubric for analysis of novice students laboratory flow diagrams," International journal of science education, Vol. 27 No. 1. p43-59, 2005, January https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000243754
  8. Williams, M. T. et al.,"Crossing Academic Cultures: A Rubric for Students and Teachers," Journal of Basic Writing, Vol. 24 No. 1. p93-119, 2005. Spring
  9. Amos, M. A. et al.,"Rubric Development to Measure Council for Chiropractic Education Competencies in Neuromusculoskeletal Examination," Journal of Chiropractic Education, Vol. 20 No. 1, 49, 2006. Spring
  10. Kohn, K. W. et al. ,"Molecular Interaction Maps of Bioregulatory Networks: A General Rubric for Systems BiologyRubric Development to Masure Council for Chiropractic Education Competencies in Neuromusculoskeletal Examination," Molecular biology of the cell, Vol. 17 No. 1, 2006.
  11. Wechsler, B. et al al., "Pregnancy and internal medicine: a new rubric," Revue Demedecine Interne, Vol. 23 No.2, 121, 2002. Feb https://doi.org/10.1016/S0248-8663(01)00526-4
  12. McVee, M. B. et al.,"Creating a rubric to examine literacy software for the primary grades," The Reading teacher, Vol. 55 No.7, p635-639, 2002. April
  13. Gause, A, "Introduction to the rubric "Immunological News"," Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, Vol. 61 No.2, 2002.
  14. Bondeson, S. R. et al., "Rubric for Content Classification," Journal of college science teaching, Vol.32 No.3, p182-187, 2002. Nov
  15. Jackson. C. W. et al. "Rubric Teaching Students to Use Grading Rubrics," Teaching exceptional children, Vol.35 No.1, p40-45 , 2002. Sep-Oct https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990203500106
  16. Thomas. J. D. E. et al., "A Rubric for the Evaluation of Interactive Multimedia and the Impact of Instruction on Students' Evaluation," The Journal of computer information systems, Vol.43 No.4. 2003, July
  17. Roblyer, M. D. et al al., "Design and Use of a Rubric to Assess and Encourage Interactive Qualities in Distance Cburses," American Journal of Distance Education, Vol.17 No.2, p77-98, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1702_2
  18. Hafner, J. C. et al.,"Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: an empirical study of student peer-group rating," International journal of science education. Vol.25 No.12, p1509-1528, 2003, Dec https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069022000038268
  19. Besterfield-Sacre, M. et al., "Scoring Concept Maps: An Integrated Rubric for Assessing Engineering Education", Journal of Engineering Education -Washington-, Vo1.93 No.2, 105, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00795.x