한국산림과학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science)

  • 제98권2호
  • /
  • Pages.197-202
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2586-6613(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-6621(eISSN)
한국산림과학회 (Korean Society of Forest Science)
권호 표지

Bird Communities in Rice Field and Grasslands during the Dry Season in the Mekong Delta, Cambodia

  • Kry, Msphal (Wildlife Protection Office, Forestry Administration,Department of Forest Resources, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Woo-Shin (Department of Forest Resources, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Sung Jin (Department of Forest Resources, Seoul National University) ;
  • Rhim, Shin-Jae (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University)
  • 투고 : 2009.03.12
  • 심사 : 2009.04.16
  • 발행 : 2009.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

We studied bird communities among in rice field (46 plots), short grallland (47plot), and tall grass mixed shrub (21 plots) during dry season, January 2007 in Boeung Prek Lapouv (BPL) Important Bird Area, Mekong Delta, Cambodia using the point-count method. Water depth, vegetation height and shrub density were significantly different among the three study areas. We recorded, 60 bird species, of which 13 differed significantly among habitats. Landbirds such as Grey-breasted Prinia (Prinia hodgsonii) and Oliver-black Sunbird (Nectarinia jugularis) were much more abundant (P<0.0001) in the tall grass mixed shrub, whereas the Sarus Crane (Grus antigone), herons and egrets were more abundant in the short grass (P<0.05). Bird species richness and species abundances were not significantly different among habitats. Bird species diversity (H') was higher in grasslands than in rice fields. Mosaic habitat matrix, such as rice field, short grass, and tall grass mixed shrub, should be maintained for the extend and quality of wetlands, and the prevailing human-land use patterns, appear adequate and conductive for waterbirds in the Mekong Delta, Cambodia.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Korea Forest Service

참고문헌

  1. Bambaradeniya, C.N.B. and Amarasinghe, F.P. 2004. Biodiversity associated with the rice field agroecosystem in Asian Countries: a brief review. Working Paper 63. International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka
  2. Bauld, S. 2005. Ecotourism feasibility study of Beoung Prek Lapouv Important Bird Area, Takoe Province. BirdLife International in Indochina, Cambodia Program Office. Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  3. Blanco, D.E., Lopez-Lanus, B., Dias, R.A., Azpiroz, A. and Rilla, F. 2006. Use of rice fields by migratory shorebirds in southern South America. Wetland International. Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  4. Bolen, E.G. and Robinson, W.L. 2003. Wildlife ecology and management. 5th ed. Peason Education, Inc. New York
  5. Bonham, C.D. 1989. Measurements for terrestrial vegetation. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. New York
  6. Borad, C.K., Mukherjee, A. and Parasharya, B.M. 2001.Damage potential of Indian sarus crane in paddy crop agroecosystem in Kheda District, Gujarat, India. Agriculture,Ecosystem and Environment 86: 211-215 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00275-9
  7. Bryan, G.G. and Best, L.B. 1991. Bird abundance and species richness in grassland waterways in Iowa rowcrop fileds. American Midland Naturalist 126: 90-102 https://doi.org/10.2307/2426153
  8. Buckingham, D.L., Peach, W.J. and Fox, D.S. 2006. Effects of agriculture management on the use of lowland grassland by foraging birds. Agriculture, Ecology and Environment 112: 21-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.06.019
  9. Cunningham, M.A. 2005. A comparison of public lands and farmlands for grassland bird conservation. Professional Geographer 57: 51-65
  10. Czech, H.A. and Parsons, K.C. 2002. Agriculture, wetlands and waterbirds. Waterbirds 25: 56-65 https://doi.org/10.1675/1524-4695(2002)025[0056:BEOWTI]2.0.CO;2
  11. Elphick, C.S. 2000. Functional equivalency between rice field and seminatural wetland habitats. Conservation Biology 14: 181-191 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98314.x
  12. Elphick, C.S. and Oring, L.W. 1998. Winter management of Californian rice field for waterbirds. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 95-108 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00274.x
  13. Falosa, M., Canova, L. and Saino, N. 1996. Rice field support a large portion of herons breeding in the Mediterranean region. Colonial Waterbirds 19: 129-134 https://doi.org/10.2307/1521956
  14. Fasola, M. and Ruiz, X. 1996. The value of rice field as substitutes for natural wetlands for water birds in the Mediterranean region. Colonail Waterbirds 19: 122-128 https://doi.org/10.2307/1521955
  15. Frere, E., Quintana, F. and Gandini, P. 2002. Diving behavior of the Red-legged Cormorant in Southeastern Patagonia, Argentina. Condor 104: 440-444 https://doi.org/10.1650/0010-5422(2002)104[0440:DBOTRL]2.0.CO;2
  16. Fujioka, M., Armacost, J.W., Yoshida, H. and Maeda, T. 2001. Value of fallow farmlands as summer habitats for waterbirds in a Japanese rural area. Ecological Research 16: 555-567 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00417.x
  17. Hostetler, M.E. and Main, M.B. 2001. Florida morning program: point count method to survey birds. Institute of food and agriculture science, University of Florida. Gainesville
  18. International Centre for Environmental Management (ICEM). 2003. Cambodia national report on protected areas and development. Review of protected areas and development in the lower Mekong River region. International Centre for Environmental Management. Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  19. Kennedy, R.S., Gonzales, P.C., Dickinson, E.D., Miranda, H.C. and Fisher, T.H. 2000. A field guide to the birds of Philippines. Oxford University Press. Oxford. United Kingdom
  20. Koskimies, T. 1989. Birds as a tool in environmental monitoring. Annales Zoologici Finnici 26: 153-166
  21. Maeda, T. 2001. Patterns of bird abundance and habitat use in rice fields of the Kanto Plain, central Japan. Ecological Research 16: 569-585 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00418.x
  22. Maeda, T. 2005. Bird use of rice strips of varying width in the Kanto Plain of central Japan. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 105: 347-351 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.02.007
  23. Miller, M.R., Sharp, D.E. and Gilmer, D.S. 1989. Rice available to waterfowl in harvested fields in the Sacramento Valley, California. California Fish Game 75:113-123
  24. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF).2006. Annual conference 2006 on agriculture, forestry and fisheries. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Cambodia. Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  25. Rosenstock, S.S., Anderson, D.R., Giesen, K.M., Leukering, T. and Carter, M.F. 2002. Landbird counting techniques: current practices and an alternative. Auk 119: 46-53 https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0046:LCTCPA]2.0.CO;2
  26. Sapoznokow, A. and Quintana, F. 2003. Foraging behavior of feeding location of Imperial Cormorants and Rock Shags breeding sympatrically in Patagonia,Argentina. Waterbirds 26: 184-291 https://doi.org/10.1675/1524-4695(2003)026[0184:FBAFLO]2.0.CO;2
  27. SAS Institute. 2003. Users installation guide for SAS.Version 9.1.3. SAS Institute Inc. New York
  28. Seng, K.H., Pech, B., Poole, C.M., Andrew, W., Tordoff, A.W., Davidsion. P. and Delattre, E. 2003. Key sites for conservation. Forestry Administration, BirdLife International, WWF and WCS Cambodia. Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  29. Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W.J. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press. Urbana
  30. Shimada, T., Bowman, A. and Ishida, M. 2000. Effects of flooding on a wetland bird community. Ecological Research 15: 229-235 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2000.00340.x
  31. Sin, S. and Nuth, S. 1995. Country report to the FAO international technical conference on the plant genetic resources. FAO. New York
  32. Sundar, G.K.S. 2006. Flock size, density and habitat selection for four large waterbirds species in an agriculture landscape in Uttar Pradesh, India. Waterbirds 29: 365-374 https://doi.org/10.1675/1524-4695
  33. Toureng, C., Nicolas, S., Beck, N., Francois, M. and Jean-Louis, M. 2003. Effects of cropping practice on the use of rice fields by waterbirds in the Camargue, France. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 95:543-549 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00203-7
  34. Tubelis, D.P. and Cavalcanti, R.B. 2000. A comparison of bird communities in natural and disturbed non-wetland open habitats in the Cerrado’s central region, Brazil. Bird Conservation International 10: 331-350 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270900000290
  35. Walden, D., van Dam, R., Finlayson, M., Storrs, M., Lowry, J. and Kriticos, D. 2004. A risk assessment of the tropical wetland weed Mimosa pigra in northern Australia. In: 3rd International Symposium on the Management of Mimosa pigra. Darwin, Australia. pp. 45-51
  36. Willard, D.E. 1977. The feeding ecology and behavior of five species of herons in southeastern New Jersey. Condor 79: 462-470 https://doi.org/10.2307/1367726