Partial Budget Modeling of Economic Losses of Aujeszky's Disease

부분예산분석을 이용한 오제스키병 발생 농가의 경제적 손실 추정

  • Pak, Son-Il (School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Choi-Kyu (National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service) ;
  • Moon, Oun-Kyong (National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service) ;
  • Yoon, Hachung (National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service) ;
  • Lee, Byeong-Yong (National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Jin (National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service)
  • 박선일 (강원대학교 수의학부대학 및 동물의학종합연구소) ;
  • 박최규 (국립수의과학검역원) ;
  • 문운경 (국립수의과학검역원) ;
  • 윤하정 (국립수의과학검역원) ;
  • 이병용 (국립수의과학검역원) ;
  • 이상진 (국립수의과학검역원)
  • Accepted : 2009.10.23
  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

Aujeszky's disease (AD) is a respiratory, infectious viral illness associated with high mortality, especially in neonatal piglets and has frequently been considered an economically important disease in many endemic countries. Although AD is still occurring in a geographically defined region in Korea, little attention has been paid to the economics of AD. In this study, partial budget technique was used to develop a simulation model to measure financial losses following the disease epidemic in a swine operation utilizing stochastic or deterministic parameters from the literatures and the index case herd of AD occurred in 2005, where available and applicable. For the infected case herd with a 12500-pig, the total economic loss for this operation was estimated to be about 199 million Korean won (95% confidence interval [CI] 148,645,000-250,741,000). Given net loss due to death of a pig at sow level was 119,000 won, total loss for the case herd with 1200 sows accounted for 143 million won (95% CI 92,599,000-193,729,000). The net loss of the death of one pig at growing and fattening level resulted in loss of 46,000 won (95% CI 40,000-53,000) and 126,000 won (95% CI 122,000-131,000), respectively. Taking into account for the number of pigs raised in the case herd, total loss amounted to 8 million won (95% CI 7,167,000-9,347,000) and 12 million won (95% CI 11,959,000-12,891,000), for growers and fatteners, respectively, assuming 63% of saved feed intake when a pig dies halfway through the respective period. Under the model's assumptions, suckling pig mortality was the major factors of loss in estimating the economic consequences (approximately 71.8% of the total loss). The high economic losses of a herd infected with AD suggest that the effective and region-specific control measures should be implemented in disease endemic foci.

Keywords

References

  1. 농림수산식품부. 가축전염병중앙예찰협의회 자료집. pp. 34-35, 국립수의과학검역원, 안양, 2009
  2. 박최규, 이은섭, 이병용, 윤하정, 남향미, 김철희, 조영호, 이기중, 김도욱, 위성환, 문운경, 이주호. 돼지 오제스키병의 발생 역학 및 경제적 피해분석 모델개 발. 국립수의과학검역원 연구보고서. pp. 322-369, 국립수의과학검역원, 안양, 2005
  3. 송주호, 우병준, 허덕, 박선일. 가축질병의 경제적 영향분석. 한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고서(R519). pp.1-142, 한국농촌경제연구원, 서울, 2006
  4. 신승열. 송우진, 이형우. 최근 가축질병 발생이 육류 소비에 미치는 영향 분석. 농정연구속보. 한국농촌경 제연구원, 서울, 2004
  5. 우병준, 이형우, 황윤재, 이정민, 김진년. 조류인플루엔자발생의 경제적 영향과 대책. 한국농촌경제연구원연구보고서(P102). pp. 1-79, 한국농촌경제연구원, 서울, 2008
  6. 정찬길, 류영수, 정해동, 강정현, 김진현, 정호경. 가축질병으로 인한 양돈, 양계산업의 경제적 손실분석 연구. 농림부 정책연구과제 최종보고서. pp. 1-235, 농림부, 과천, 2001
  7. 최정섭, 정민국, 전상곤, 성동현, 허덕. 2002 구제역 발생 실태와 파급영향. 한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고서(P56). pp. 1-93, 한국농촌경제연구원, 서울, 2002
  8. Allore HG, Erb HN. Partial budget of the discounted annual benefit of mastitis control strategies. J Dairy Sci 1998, 81, 2280-2292 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75808-4
  9. de Lange C, Dewey CE. Management of growingfinishing pigs. In: Straw BE, Zimmerman JJ, D'Allaire S, Taylor DJ (eds.). Diseases of Swine. 9th ed. pp. 1055-1064, Blackwell, Iowa, 2006
  10. Hoblet KH, Miller GY, Bartter NG. Economic assessment of a pseudorabies epizootic, breeding herd removal/repopulation, and downtime in a commercial swine herd. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987, 190, 405-409
  11. Larson RL, Miller RB, Kleiboeker SB, Miller MA, White BJ. Economic costs associated with two testing strategies for screening feeder calves for persistent infection with bovine viral diarrhea virus. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005, 226, 249-254 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2005.226.249
  12. Miller GY, Forster DL, Tsai J, Bowman G. Productivity and profitability differences between pseudorabies-infected and pseudorabies-noninfected farrow-to-finish swine herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995, 206, 446-451
  13. Overton MW. Cost comparison of natural service sires and artificial insemination for dairy cattle reproductive management. Theriogenology 2005, 64, 589-602 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.015
  14. Pluske JR, Dividich JL, Hampson DJ. Nursery pig management. In: Straw BE, Zimmerman JJ, D'Allaire S, Taylor DJ (eds.). Diseases of Swine. 9th ed. pp. 1039-1053, Blackwell, Iowa, 2006
  15. Rougoor CW, Dijkhuizen AA, Hurine RBM, Marsh WE. Impact of different approaches to calculate the economics of disease in pig farming. Prev Vet Med 1996, 26, 315-328 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(95)00545-5
  16. Wittum TE, Dewey CE. Partial budget analysis of sow Escherichia coli vaccination. Swine Health Prod 1996, 4, 9-13