Journal of Korean Society of Steel Construction (한국강구조학회 논문집)

Korean Society of Steel Construction (한국강구조학회)
권호 표지

Compression Behavior of Steel Plate-Concrete Structures for both Stiffened and Nonstiffened structures by Rib

리브 보강 유무에 따른 강판-콘크리트 구조의 압축거동

  • Received : 2009.02.19
  • Accepted : 2009.10.10
  • Published : 2009.10.27
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the compression behaviors of SSC (stiffened steel plate-concrete) and NSC (non-stiffened steel plate-concrete) structures, and to identify the effects of the increment in the structural performance of SSC structures. SCC structures are structures that integrate steel plates with line support from ribs (H-shape) and point supports from studs with concretes. On the other hand, NSC structures are structures that integrate steel plates with point supports from studs with concrete. The following results were obtained in this study. First, compared with NSC structures, it was shown that SSC structures have advantages in terms of preventing steel plate buckling and delaying quick destruction through the brittleness of concrete. In addition, the SSC structures showed a 5-28% increment in maximum compressive strength, which far surpassed that shown by the NSC structures.

본 연구는 SSC(Stiffened Steel Plate-Concrete) 구조와 NSC(Non-Stiffened Steel Plate-Concrete) 구조의 압축거동 특성을 비교 분석하여 SSC 구조의 구조적 성능 향상 효과를 파악하는데 그 목적이 있다. 여기서, SSC 구조는 강판에 리브(H형강)을 사용하여 선지지하고 스터드로 점지지하여 콘크리트와 일체화 시킨 구조이다. 한편 NSC 구조는 강판에 스터드로 점지지하여 콘크리트와 일체화 시킨 구조이다. 실험을 통해 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. SSC 구조가 NSC 구조에 비해 시험체의 강판좌굴 억제 및 급격한 콘크리트의 취성파괴를 방지하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 SSC 구조가 NSC 구조에 비해 약 5%~28%정도 최대압축강도가 증가한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 최병정, 한홍수, 김원기, 이승준, 김우범(2008) 스터드 간격과 강판두께의 비를 변수로 한 비보강 강판-콘크리트 구조의 압축실험, 한국강구조학회논문집, 한국강구조학회, 제20권 4호 pp.561-570
  2. 최병정, 한홍수, 김원기, 이승준, 김우범(2008) 스터드 간격과 강판두께의 비를 변수로 한 보강 강판-콘크리트 구조의 압축실험, 한국강구조학회논문집, 한국강구조학회, 제20권 4호 pp.549-559
  3. 대한건축학회(2005), 건설교통부 고시 건축구조설계기준
  4. ACI(2005) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI318-05) & Commentary(ACI318R-05 )
  5. AIJ(2001) Standard for Structural Calculation of Steel Reinforced Concrete Structures; Based on Allowable Stress Concept
  6. AISC(2005) Specification for Structural Steel Buildings
  7. Bi-Steel Bulletin, Corefast takes star role at opening of new cinema complex,
  8. BSi(2005) Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures
  9. JEAG 4618(2005) Technical Guidelines for Seismic Design of Steel Plate Concrete Structures: for Buildings and Structures
  10. Kanchi, Masaki et al.(1996) Experimental Study on A Concrete Filled Steel Structure, Part 2., Compressive Test (1), Architectural Institute of Japan Conference, pp.1071-1072
  11. Miyauchi, Y. et al.(1996) Experimental Study on A Concrete Filled Steel Structure, Part 3 Compressive Test (2), Architectural Institute of Japan Conference, pp.1073-1074
  12. Takeuchi, M. Narikawa, M. Matsuo, I. Hara, K. Uaami S.(1998) Study on a concrete filled structure for nuclear power plants, Nuclear Engineering and Design 179, pp.209-223 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00282-3