A basic study on the animal welfare evaluation in Korean zoos

국내 동물원의 동물복지 평가에 관한 기초 연구

  • Cho, Kyung Uk (Children's Grand Park, Seoul Metropolitan Facilities Management Corporation) ;
  • Choe, Byung-In (College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Hwi Yool (Veterinary Science Research Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University) ;
  • Han, Jin Soo (Institute for the 3Rs, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Jin Suk (Veterinary Science Research Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University)
  • 조경욱 (서울시설관리공단 어린이대공원) ;
  • 최병인 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학) ;
  • 김휘율 (건국대학교 수의과대학 수의과학연구소) ;
  • 한진수 (건국대학교 수의과대학 3R동물복지연구소) ;
  • 김진석 (건국대학교 수의과대학 수의과학연구소)
  • Accepted : 2009.02.25
  • Published : 2009.03.30

Abstract

The concept about zoo is changing from the animal exhibition which simply contained the animals to the ecological zoo which has the function of preserving the animal species. At the central point of maintaining such role, the basic principle called the animal welfare lies obviously. Korea has applied the animal welfare principles such as carrying out the enrichment in the zoos since 2003, but there has not been any institutional device to evaluate and examine the application of the animal welfare so far. This study aims to confirm the level of animal welfare in Korea and suggest a developmental direction. For the purpose of the study, 12 zoos in Korea were evaluated according to 68 evaluating categories. 'Five Principles of Animal Welfare' in the Secretary of State's Standards of Modern Zoo Practice were selected and carried out as the evaluation categories, and the result, from the highest to lowest score given, was 'provision of food and water', 'provision of protection from fear and distress', 'provision of health care', 'provision of an opportunity to express most normal behaviours', and 'provision of a suitable enrichment' with the overall score of the entire Korean zoos being 2.86 (${\pm}$ 0.56). It was also confirmed that in order to improve the animal welfare of the Korean zoos, the animal management system must be standardized and organized. The evaluation and feedback, the active practice of animal welfare and its legislative support should be provided to establish an effective institutional device as well.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립수의과학검역원. 동물보호에 관한 국민의식 조사결과 보고서. p. 13, 국립수의과학검역원, 안양, 2006
  2. 대한수의사회. 한국수의 50년사. p. 548, 대한수의사회, 성남, 1998
  3. Agoramoorthy G, Harrison B. Ethics and animalwelfare evaluations in south east asian zoos: A casestudy of Thailand. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2002, 5, 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0501_1
  4. Baxter MC, Baxter SH. How to delineate the sow's welfare needs? Ann Rech Vet 1984, 15, 281-286
  5. Dawkins MS. Behaviour as a tool in the asse of animal welfare. Zoology 2003, 106, 383-387 https://doi.org/10.1078/0944-2006-00122
  6. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). Standards of Modern Zoo Practice.pp. 84-88, DEFRA, London, 2004
  7. Department for Environment, Food and RuralAffairs (DEFRA). The Zoos Forum Handbook. pp.197-199, 207-218, DEFRA, London, 2007
  8. Duncan IJH. Thirty years of progress in animalwelfare science. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 1998, 1, 151-154
  9. Fraser D. Science, values and animal welfare: exploring the 'Inextricable connection'. Anim Welf 1995, 4, 103-117
  10. Jordan B. Science-based assessment of animal welfare:wild and captive animals. Rev Sci Tech 2005, 24, 515-528 https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.24.2.1588
  11. Kohn B. Zoo animal welfare. Rev Sci Tech 1994, 13,233-245 https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.13.1.764
  12. Lindley S. While Rome Burns: A Report into Conditions in the Zoos of Ontario. p. 5, World Societyfor the Protection of Animals, Toronto, 1998
  13. Maple TL. Toward a science of welfare for animalsin the zoo. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2007, 10, 63-70 https://doi.org/10.1080/10888700701277659
  14. Taylor AA, Hurnik JF, Lehman H. The applicationof cost-benefit dominance analysis to the assessment offarm animal quality of life. Soc Indic Res 1995, 35,313-329 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079164
  15. Wielebnowski N. Stress and distress: evaluating theirimpact for the well-being of zoo animals. J Am VetMed Assoc 2003, 223, 973-977 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.973