Correction of a Wide Alveolar Cleft with Reverse L osteotomy and Liou Alveolar Distractor

역 L 형 절골술과 Liou 신연기를 이용한 넓은 치조열의 교정

  • Lee, Myung Chul (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Institute for Human Tissue Restoration Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lew, Dae Hyun (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Institute for Human Tissue Restoration Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Beyoung Yun (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Institute for Human Tissue Restoration Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kwon, Soon Man (Eastman Orthodontic Center)
  • 이명철 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실 연세대학교 의과대학 인체조직복원연구소) ;
  • 유대현 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실 연세대학교 의과대학 인체조직복원연구소) ;
  • 박병윤 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실 연세대학교 의과대학 인체조직복원연구소) ;
  • 권순만 (이스트만 치과)
  • Published : 2009.07.15

Abstract

Purpose: A successful surgical treatment for a wide alveolar cleft with bone graft is difficult to achieve due to several factors such as the limitation of gingivoperiosteal flap, the presence of large scar tissues, and the poor blood circulation. To overcome these problems, alveolar distraction osteogenesis using Liou alveolar distraction device was applied. We analyzed the consequences of this surgical treatment. Method: Between 2006 January and 2007 August, we have conducted analysis on the methods and consequences of Liou alveolar distraction osteogenesis for 6 patients. The age of patients was 12 years and 6 months in average. The follow up period was 19 months in average. The Reverse L osteotomy followed by the placement of the Liou alveolar distraction device was performed. After serial distraction, the distractor was removed after 5 months of the process of osteogenesis, and the result was analyzed using the computed tomography and the x-ray films of the alveolar bone and the teeth. Results: The alveolar cleft with 12.5 mm in average width was filled with 8.5 mm of newly formed bone tissue in average width after 5 months of osteogenesis. Among the 6 cases, 5 required the additional bone graft and 1 case only required the gingivoperioplasty. The newly formed bone tissues did not show any signs of bone resorption. However, a considerable degree of teeth displacement was shown. Conclusion: For the alveolar cleft too wide to be reconstructed by a general bone graft, it is strongly recommended to perform the reverse L osteotomy of the cleft side with Liou alveolar distraction device to initiate the alveolar osteogenesis. However, the migrated teeth showed some degree of relapse, thus, the orthodontic treatment is essential following the distraction osteogenesis treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. Hoffman WY, Mount D: Cleft Palate Repair. In Mathes SJ (eds): Plastic Surgery. 2nd ed, Philadelphia, Elsevier, 2006, p 249
  2. Liou EJ, Chen PK, Huang CS, Chen YR: Interdental distraction osteogenesis and rapid orthodontic tooth movement: a novel approach to approximate a wide alveolar cleft or bony defect. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 1262, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200004040-00002
  3. Yen SL, Gross J, Wang P, Yamashita DD: Closure of a large alveolar cleft by bony transport of a posterior segment using orthodontic archwires attached to bone: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59: 688, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.23405
  4. Kim S, Ryu HS, Kim JC: The treatment of wide alveolar cleft: Bilateral interdental distraction osteogenesis. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 29: 131, 2002
  5. Mitsugia M, Itoa O, Alcalde RE: Maxillary bone transportation in alveolar cleft-transport distraction osteogenesis for treatment of alveolar cleft repair. Br J Plast Surg 58: 619, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2005.02.020