Journal of Information Technology Services (한국IT서비스학회지)

Korea Society of IT Services (한국IT서비스학회)
권호 표지

An Improvement Study of EA Maturity Models based on a Case Application Analysis

EA 성숙도 모델의 적용 사례분석 및 개선방안

  • 이석균 (숭실대학교 대학원 컴퓨터학과) ;
  • 이영민 (숭실대학교 대학원 컴퓨터학과) ;
  • 류성열 (숭실대학교 컴퓨터학과)
  • Published : 2009.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Korean government has operated EA by the act on efficient introduction of information system and operation. etc. But the utilization and the evaluation system for EA don't prepare well. In this study. we analyzed characteristics and advantages of EA maturity models that is developed by some domestic and foreign government departments in logical view. and then we derive evaluation scopes and factors of the models. Also. we applied the models to EA maturity for the B organization and measured maturity levels. We identify similarity and difference between the models. We propose evaluation scopes, levels and factors between the models and solutions for evaluation ambiguity by evaluators and maturity improvement through the identified results.

Keywords

References

  1. 법제처, 정보시스템의 효율적 도입 및 운영등에 관한 법률, 2005
  2. 법제처, 정부업무평가 기본법, 2006
  3. 서경석, "공공부문에서 엔터프라이즈 아키텍처 프로그램의 평가 및 개선을 위한 성숙도 모델", 숭실대학교, 2006
  4. 이헌중, "ITA 개념", 한국 전산원 ITA 정기세미나, 2006
  5. 정보통신부, 정보기술아키텍처 도입/운영 지침, 2006
  6. 한국정보통신기술협회, "공공부문 전사적 아키텍처 프레임워크 표준", http://www.tta.or.kr, 2003
  7. 행정자치부, 전자정부아키텍처 도입을 위한 실무 가이드, 2005
  8. Dean R. Spitzer, "Rethinking the Way We Measure and Drive Organizational Success", AMACOM, 2007
  9. "Enterprise Architecture", "http://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_Architecture", Wikipedia, 2008
  10. General Accounting Office, "A Framework for Assessing and Improving Enterprise Architecture Management(Version 1.1)", http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03584g.pdf, 2003
  11. IEEE, "System and software engineering-Software life cycle processes：IEEE 12207-2008", IEEE, 2008
  12. MITRE Corporation, "Guide to the Evolving Enterprise Architecture Body of Knowledge", http://www.mitre.org/tech/eabok/documents/eabok.pdf, 2004
  13. Office of Management and Budget, EA Assessment Framework, http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/documents/OMB_EA_Assessment_Framework_2_FINAL.pdf, 2005
  14. Peter Weill, MIT Center for Information Systems Research, Sixth e-Business Conference, 2007.
  15. Software Engineering Institute, "Capability Maturity Model Integration(CMMI) Version 1.1-Continuous Representation, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/publication/document/02.reports/02tr011.html, 2002
  16. Takaaki Kamogawa, Hitoshi Okada, "A Framework for Enterprise Architecture Effectiveness", ICSSSM, Vol.1(2005), pp.740-745
  17. "TOGAF as an Enterprise Architecture Framework", "http://www.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf8-doc/arch/", 2006