DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk Factors Predicting Unfavorable Neurological Outcome during the Early Period after Traumatic Brain Injury

  • Park, Jung-Eon (Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Hyun (Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Soo-Han (Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Kyung-Gi (Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Se-Hyuk (Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • Published : 2009.02.28

Abstract

Objective : We aimed to identify clinico-radiological risk factors that may predict unfavorable neurological outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI), and to establish a guideline for patient selection in clinical trials that would improve neurological outcome during the early post TBI period. Methods : Initial clinico-radiological data of 115 TBI patients were collected prospectively. Regular neurological assessment after standard treatment divided the above patients into 2 groups after 6 months : the Favorable neurological outcome group (GOS : good & moderate disability, DRS : 0-6, LCFS : 8-10) and the Unfavorable group (GOS : severe disability-death, DRS : 7-29 and death, LCFS : 1-7 and death). Results : There was a higher incidence of age $\geq$35 years, low initial GCS score, at least unilateral pupil dilatation, and neurological deficit in the Unfavorable group. The presence of bilateral parenchymal lesions or lesions involving the midline structures in the initial brain CT was observed to be a radiological risk factor for unfavorable outcome. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age and initial GCS score were independent risk factors. The majority of the Favorable group patients with at least one or more risk factors showed improvement of GCS scores within 2 months after TBI. Conclusion : Patients with the above mentioned clinico-radiological risk factors who received standard treatment, but did not demonstrate neurological improvement within 2 months after TBI were deemed at risk for unfavorable outcome. These patients may be eligible candidates for clinical trials that would improve functional outcome after TBI.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrews PJ, Sleeman DH, Statham PF, McQuatt A, Corruble V, Jones PA, et al : Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data : a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression. J Neurosurg 97 : 326-336, 2002 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0326
  2. Bruns J Jr, Hauser WA : The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury : a review. Epilepsia 44 (Suppl 10) : 2-10, 2003
  3. Choi SC, Muizelaar JP, Barnes TY, Marmarou A, Brooks DM, Young HF : Prediction tree for severely head-injured patients. J Neurosurg 75 : 251-255, 1991 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.75.2.0251
  4. Ercan M, Inci S, Kilinc K, Palaoglu S, Aypar Ü : Nimodipine attenuates lipid peroxidation during the acute phase of head trauma in rats. Neurosurg Rev 24 : 127-130, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012396
  5. Gunnarsson T, Fehlings MG : Acute neurosurgical management of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury. Curr Opin Neurol 16 : 717-723, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00019052-200312000-00012
  6. Hammond FM, Grattan KD, Sasser H, Corrigan JD, Bushnik T, Zafonte RD : Long-term recovery course after traumatic brain injury : a comparison of the functional independence measure and disability rating scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil 16 : 318-329, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200108000-00003
  7. Hukkelhoven CW, Steyerberg EW, Habbema JD, Farace E, Marmarou A, Murray GD, et al : Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury : development and validation of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics. J Neurotrauma 22 : 1025-1039, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2005.22.1025
  8. Hukkelhoven CW, Steyerberg EW, Rampen AJ, Farace E, Habbema JD, Marchall LF, et al : Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury : an analysis of 5600 patients. J Neurosurg 99 : 666-673, 2003 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.99.4.0666
  9. Jiang JY, Gao GY, Li WP, Yu MK, Zhu C : Early Indicators of prognosis in 846 cases of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 19 : 869-874, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1089/08977150260190456
  10. Lu D, Mahmood A, Wang L, Li Y, Lu M, Chopp M : Adult bone marrow stromal cells administered intravenously to rats after traumatic brain injury migrate into brain and improve neurological outcome. Neuroreport 12 : 559-563, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200103050-00025
  11. Maas AI, Dearden M, Teasdale GM, Braakman R, Cohadon F, Iannotti F, et al : EBIC-guidelines for management of severe head injury in adults. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139 : 286-294, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01808823
  12. Mahmood A, Lu D, Chopp M : Marrow stromal cell transplantation after traumatic brain injury promotes cellular proliferation within the brain. Neurosurgery 55 : 1185-1193, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000141042.14476.3C
  13. Marik PE, Varon J, Trask T : Management of head trauma. Chest 122 : 699-711, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.122.2.699
  14. Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauberg MR, Berkum VCM, Eisenberg HM, Jane JA, et al : A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 75 : S14-S20, 1991
  15. Moppett IK : Traumatic brain injury : assessment, resuscitation and early management. Br J Anaesth 99 : 18-31, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem128
  16. Murray GD, Taesdale GM, Schmitz H : Nimodipine in traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage : a re-analysis of the HIT-I and HIT-II trials. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 138 : 1163-1167, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01809745
  17. Pickett W, Ardern C, Brison RJ : A population-based study of potential brain injuries requiring emergency care. CMAJ 165 : 288-292, 2001
  18. Riess P, Zhang C, Saatman KE, Laurer HL, Longhi LG, Raghupathi R, et al : Transplanted neural stem cells survive, differentiate, and improve neurological motor function after experimental traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery 51 : 1043-1052; discussion 1052-1054, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200210000-00035
  19. Signorini DF, Andrews PJ, Jones PA, Wardlaw JM, Miller JD : Predicting survival using simple clinical variables : a case study in traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66 : 20-25, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.66.1.20
  20. Wardlaw JM, Easton VJ, Statham P : Which CT features help predict outcome after head injury? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72 : 188-192; discussion 151, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.72.2.188
  21. Wennersten A, Meier X, Holmin S, Wahlberg L, Mathiesen T : Proliferation, migration, and differentiation of human neural stem/ progenitor cells after transplantation into a rat model of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 100 : 88-96, 2004 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.100.1.0088

Cited by

  1. Analysis of Risk Factors for the Development of Post-Operative Epidural Hematoma after Intracranial Surgery vol.8, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2012.8.2.79
  2. A Role of Serum-Based Neuronal and Glial Markers as Potential Predictors for Distinguishing Severity and Related Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury vol.58, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.2.93
  3. Effects of Quercetin and Mannitol on Erythropoietin Levels in Rats Following Acute Severe Traumatic Brain Injury vol.60, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.0505.015
  4. Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review vol.29, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773818792459