The Journal of Information Systems (한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구)

Korea Association of Information Systems (한국정보시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bibliometrics for advancement R&D Planning : Detecting Emerging Trends in Scientific Literatures

선도 R&D 계획에 관한 계량서지분석; 과학문헌에서의 유망동향 탐색

  • Received : 2009.09.23
  • Accepted : 2009.10.14
  • Published : 2009.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

승자독식(Winner Takes All)이라는 글로벌 경쟁원리로 인해 세계 주요 국가들 사이에 R&D 경쟁이 갈수록 치열해지고 있다. 이에 우리나라에서도 R&D 지원 확대 및 다양한 정책기획 활동 등이 전개되었다. 이러한 노력에도 불구하구 국가 차원에서 기획 및 정책조정이 효과적으로 추진되지 못하고 있으며, 국가연구개발사업 차원에서는 "기획의 양척 과다와 질적 부실"이라는 비판이 제기되고 있다. 반면에 기술 융복합화의 가속화 등 R&D 환경의 불확실성은 더욱 높아졌으며 국가연구개발사업의 규모 증가와 함께 연구기획의 복잡성은 더욱 더 높아졌다. 최근에는 국가 차원의 비전수립과 중장기 정책기획에 기초하여 사업기획과 과제기획을 연계 수행하는 등 기획을 통해 과제를 도출하는 하향식 접근이 강조되면서 기획의 중요성은 더욱 커졌다. 최근 연구기획의 새로운 기법으로서 정보분석 방법론(Information Analysis Method)이 대두되고 있다. 국가연구개발사업의 효율적 기획을 위하여 기존 기술기획 위원회(Peer Review) 방식 외에 정보분석 방법론을 통한 보완이 필요하다. 본고의 목적 크게 두 가지로 설명할 수 있다. 첫째, 현재 진행되고 있는 연구기획 및 연구기획 방법론으로 기장 많이 활용되고 있는 전문가 위원회의 한계를 제시하였다. 둘째, 최근 대두되고 있는 정보분석 방법론과 정보분석 시스템 구축, 그리고 이를 활용한 10대 기술(반도체, 디스플레이, 디지털 망원전파, 이동통신, BcN, 차세대 컴퓨팅, SW솔류션, 디지털콘텐츠, 임베디드 SW, 지식정보보안)에 대한 유망기술 발굴 실증분석을 실시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Anick, P.G., Vaithyanathan, Exploiting Clustering and Phrases for Context-Based Information Retrieval, The 20th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development, Philadelphia, PA, 1997, pp.314-323
  2. Boyack, K.W., Wylie, B.N., Davidson, G.S., Domain Visualization Using VxInsight for Science and Technology Management, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001
  3. Cambrosio, A., Limoges, C., Courtial, J.P., Laville, F., Historical scientometrics? Mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with co-word analysis. Scientometrics, Vo. 27 (2) , 1993, pp.119-143 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016546
  4. Chen, C., Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization, Springer, London, 2003
  5. Chen, C., Top 10 unsolved information visualization problems. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Vol. 25 (4), 2005, pp.12-16
  6. Chen, C., CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol.57 (3), 2006, pp.359-377 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
  7. Chen, H., Lynch, K.J., Automatic Construction of Networks of Concepts Characterizing Document Databases, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol.22 (5), 1992, pp.885-902 https://doi.org/10.1109/21.179830
  8. Chen, C., Song, I.Y., Zhu, W., Trends in conceptual modelling: Citation analysis of the ER conference papers (1979-2005), The 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI 2007), Madrid, Spain, June 25-27, 2007, pp.189-200
  9. Choi, S.Y., Kang, J.S, Kim, S.Y., Lim, Y.J., Public Administration Planning(3rd edition), ParkYoungSa, 2001
  10. Coulter, N., Monarch, I., Konda, S., Software Engineering as Seen Through Its Research Literature: A Study in Co-Word Analysis, Journal of the Americal Society for Information Science (JASIS), Vol.49 (13), 1998, pp.1206-1223, Novermber https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1998)49:13<1206::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-F
  11. Ding, Y., Gobinda, G., Foo, S., Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis, Information Processing and Management, Vol.37, 2001, pp.817-842 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00051-0
  12. Dvir, D., Lechler, T., Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: the impact of changes on project success, Research Policy, Vol.33, 2004, pp.1-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.04.001
  13. EC, Annual Innovation Policy Trends Report for Japan, China, Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, India, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia 2005, European Commission Directorate-General for Enterprise.
  14. Edwards, D., Recent Advances in Descriptive Multivariate Analysis, Royal Statistical Society Lecture Note Series, Chapter 7, Graphical Modeling, 1995, pp.135-156, Clarendon Press
  15. Garcia, M.L., Bray, O.H., Fundamentals of Technology Roadmapping, SAND97-0665, 1997
  16. Glanzel, W., Bibliometrics as a Research Field, Course Handout, 2003
  17. Horrobin, D.F., The philosophical basic of peer review and the suppression of innovation, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol.263, 1990, pp.1438-1441 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440100162024
  18. Jang, H.S., Jeong, B.G., Problem analysis of National R&D project planning assessment- focused on Industrial Technology Development Projects, The Korean Association for Public Administration Winter Conference, 2004
  19. Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.J., Finding Groups in Data, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, 1990
  20. Kostoff, R., Peer Review: The Appropriate GPRA Metric for Research, Science, Vol.277, 1997, pp.651-652 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5326.651
  21. Lee, W.H., How to identify emerging research fields using Scientometrics : An example in the field of Information Security, Scientometrics, Vol.76 (3), 2008
  22. Lee, S.J., Yoon, B.G., Park, Y.T., An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach, Technovation, 2008
  23. Lee, J.J., Current status and future development of National R&D projects in technology planning aspects, STEPI Science and Technology Forum presentation material, 2006
  24. Leydesdorff, L., The University-Industry Knowlege Relationship: Analyzing Patents and the Science Base of Technologies, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), Vol.55 (11), 2004, pp.991-1001 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20045
  25. Leydesdorff, L., Hellsten, I., Measuring the Meaning of Words in Contexts: An automated analysis of controversies about 'Monarch butterflies,' 'Frankenfoods,' and 'stem cells.' Scientometrics, Vol.67 (2), 2006, pp.231-258 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0096-y
  26. Leydesdorff, L., Sun, Y., National and International Dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-Industry- Government versus International Co-Authorship Relations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (forthcoming)
  27. Leydesdorff, L., Zhou, P., Co-Word Analysis using the Chinese Character Set, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol.59 (9), 2008, pp.1528-1530 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20862
  28. Lundvall, B., Innovation Systems between Policy and Research, paper presented at Innovation Pressure-Rethinking Competitiveness, Policy and the Society in a Globalised Economy, 15-17th March 2006, Tampere, Finland
  29. Mane, K.K., Borner, K., Mapping topics and topic bursts in PNAS, PNAS, Vol.101, 2004, pp.5287-5290 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307626100
  30. Ministry of Education Science and Technology, Result of 2008 National R&D Research Analysis, 2008
  31. Moed, H.F., Visser, M.S., developing bibliometric indicators of research performance in Computer Science: An Exploratory Study, CWTS Report 2007-01, 2007
  32. Moxham, H., Anderson, J., Peer review. A view from the inside, Science and Technology Policy, 1992, pp.7-15
  33. Park, B.W., Lim, H., Yu, J.Y., JEONG, H.Y., Frame research for precedently cycling national technology planning, KISTEP, 2007
  34. Porter, A.L., Text Mining for Technology Foresight, Technology Opportunities Analysis Project paper, Georgia Tech., 2000
  35. Porter, A.L., Cunningham, S.W., Tech Mining - Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage, WILEY- INTERSCIENCE, 2005
  36. Porter, A.L., Cohen, A.S., Roessner, D., Perreault, M., Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity, Scientometrics, Vol.72 (1), 2007, pp.117-147 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1700-5
  37. Pritchard, A., Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics, Journal of Documentation, Vol.24, 1969, pp.348-349
  38. Tijssen, R.J.W., A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology : co-classification analysis of energy research, Research Policy, Vol.21, 1992, pp.27-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(92)90025-Y
  39. Tolle, K.M., Chen, H., Comparing Noun Phrasing Techniques for Use with Medical Digital Library Tools, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol.51 (4), 2000, pp.352-370 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:4<352::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-8
  40. van Raan, A.F.J., Scientometrics : State-of-art, Scientometrics, Vol.38, 1997, pp.205-218 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461131
  41. van Raan, A.F.J., Tijssen, R.J.W., The neural net of neural network research. Scientometrics, Vol.26 (1), 1993, pp.169-192 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016799
  42. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., Andries, P., Zimmermann, E., Deleus, F., Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic citations in patents to build linkage schemes, Scientometrics, Vol.54 (3), 2002, pp.399-420 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016034516731
  43. Voutilainen, A., NPtool. A detector of English noun phrases, In Proceedings of the workshop on very large corpora Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University, 1993
  44. Whittaker, J., Creativity and Conformity in Science: Titles, Keywords, and Co-Word Analysis, Social Science in Science, Vol.19, 1989, pp.473-496
  45. Yeom, J.H., Review/outlook of 2 years into the Science and Technology Deputy-Prime Minister system, Citizen's Coalition for Scientific Society Forum, 2006

Cited by

  1. Detecting Emerging Technology to Use Social Network Analysis : Focusing on Mobile Telecommunication vol.21, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2012.21.4.109
  2. Authentic versus fictitious online reviews: A textual analysis across luxury, budget, and mid-range hotels vol.43, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515625027