DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Feeding of Citrus Byproducts on Physicochemical and Sensory Characteristics of Chicken Meat

감귤부산물 급여가 닭고기의 이화학적 특성 및 관능적 특성에 미치는 영향

  • Moon, Yoon-Hee (Dept. of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungsung University) ;
  • Jung, In-Chul (Div. of Food, Beverage and Culinary Arts, Daegu Technical University)
  • 문윤희 (경성대학교 식품생명공학과) ;
  • 정인철 (대구공업대학 식음료조리계열)
  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

In this study, the effects of feeding citrus byproduct on physicochemical and sensory characteristics of chicken meats were investigated. The samples consisted of chicken meats provided with only feed for laying hen without citrus byproduct (T-0), and the chicken meats fed with 1.0%, 1.5% and 2.0% citrus byproduct during the starter (initial period feed; $1{\sim}9th$ day), the grower (middle period feed; $10{\sim}24th$ day), and the finisher (latter period feed; $25{\sim}36th$ day), respectively. The $L^*$ value of thigh was significantly lower in the T-1 than in the T-0, the $a^*$ value was significantly higher in the T-1 than in the T-0 (p<0.05). The water holding capacity of thigh was significantly higher in the T-1 than in the T-0 and the cooking loss was significantly higher in the T-0 than in the T-1 (p<0.05). The acid value was significantly higher in the T-0 than in the T-1 (p<0.05). Antioxidant activity was higher in the T1 than in the T-0 (p<0.05). There was no significance between T-0 and T-1 regardless of feeding citrus byproduct, in terms of chicken's $b^*$ value, frozen loss, thawing loss, hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, gumminess, chewiness, shear force, free amino acid content of hot water extracts, taste, flavor, tenderness, juiciness and palatability.

본 연구는 감귤부산물 첨가 사료를 급여한 닭고기의 이화학적 특성 및 관능적 특성을 검토하기 위하여 실시하였다. 닭고기는 초기, 중기 및 후기 모두 감귤부산물을 첨가하지 않은 육계용 배합사료로 사육한 T-0, 그리고 초기($1{\sim}9$일), 중기($10{\sim}24$일) 및 후기($25{\sim}36$일) 사료에 감귤부산물을 각각 1.0%, 1.5% 및 2.0%를 첨가하여 급여한 T-1으로 구분하였다. 감귤부산물을 급여한 다리살(T-1)의 $L^*$값(명도)은 급여하지 않은 것(T-0)보다 낮았으며, $a^*$값(적색도)은 T-1이 T-0보다 유의하게 높았다. 그러나 $b^*$값(황색도)은 감귤부산물 급여의 영향이 없었다. 보수력은 다리살의 경우 T-1이 T-0보다 높았으며, 가열감량은 T-1이 T-0보다 낮았고 (p<0.05), 동결감량 및 해동감량은 감귤부산물 급여의 영향이 없었다. 경도, 탄성, 응집성, 뭉침성, 저작성 및 전단력은 감귤부산물 급여의 영향이 없었다. 산가는 T-0가 T-1보다 높았으며, 과산화물가는 감귤부산물 급여의 영향이 없었다. 항산화력은 T-1이 T-0보다 유의하게 높았다(p<0.05). 닭고기 열수추출물의 유리아미노산 함량, 맛, 풍미, 연도, 다즙성 및 전체적인 기호성은 감귤부산물 급여의 영향이 없었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ma YQ, Chen JC, Liu DH, Ye XQ. 2009. Simultaneous extraction of phenolic compounds of citrus peel extracts: Effect of ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem 16: 57-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2008.04.012
  2. Peterson JMS, Dwyer J. 1998. Flavonoids: dietary occurrence and biochemical activity. Nutr Res 18: 1995-2018 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5317(98)00169-9
  3. Senevirathne M, Jeon YJ, Ha JH, Kim SH. 2009. Effective drying of citrus by-product by high speed drying: A novel drying technique and their antioxidant activity. J Food Eng 92: 157-163 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.10.033
  4. Anagnostopoulou MA, Kefalas P, Kokkalou E, Assimopoulou AN, Papageorgiou VP. 2005. Analysis of antioxidant compounds in sweet orange peel by HPLC-diode array detection-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Biomed Chromatogr 19: 138-148 https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.430
  5. Vidua-Martos M, Ruiz-Navajas Y, Fernandez-LOpez J, Perez-Alvarez J. 2008. Antibacterial activity of lemon (Citrus lemon L.), mandarin (Citrus reticulata L.), grapefruit (Citrus paradisi L.) and orange (Citrus sinensis L.) essential oils. J Food Safety 28: 567-576 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4565.2008.00131.x
  6. Yanez JA, Remsberg CM, Miranda ND, Vega-Villa KR, Andrews PK, Davies NM. 2008. Pharmacokinetics of selected chiral flavonoids: Hesperetin, naringenin and eriodictyol in rats and their content in fruit juices. Biopharm Drug Dispos 29: 63-82 https://doi.org/10.1002/bdd.588
  7. Kawaii S, Tomono Y, Katase E, Ogawa K, Yano M. 1999. Quantization of flavonoid constituents in citrus fruits. J Agric Food Chem 47: 3565-3571 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf990153+
  8. Salman H, Bergman M, Djaldetti M, Orlin J, Bessler H. 2008. Citrus pectin affects cytokine production by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Biomed Pharmacother 62: 579-582 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2008.07.058
  9. Bousbia N, Vian MA, Ferhat MA, Meklati BY, Chemat F. 2009. A new process for extraction of essential oil from citrus peels: Microwave hydrodiffusion and gravity. J Food Eng 90: 409-413 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.034
  10. Lanza M, Fasone V, Galofaro V, Barbagallo D, Bella M, Pennisi P. 2004. Citrus pulp as an ingredient in ostrich diet: effects on meat quality. Meat Sci 68: 269-275 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.03.005
  11. Bampidis VA, Robinson PH. 2006. Citrus by-products as ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 28: 175-217 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.12.002
  12. Yang SJ, Jung IC, Moon YH. 2007. Physicochemical properties and sensory characteristics of Korean native beef loin fed with citrus byproduct. Korean J Life Sci 17: 540-545 https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2007.17.4.540
  13. Jung IC, Yang SJ, Moon YH. 2007. Feeding effect of citrus by-product TMR forage on the nutritional composition and palatability of Hanwoo loin. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 36: 578-583 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2007.36.5.578
  14. Jung IC, Yang JB, Moon YH. 2008. Effects of feed containing citrus byproducts on the phisico-chemical characteristics and palatability of Korean native chickens. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 18: 524-530
  15. Yang SJ, Jung IC, Moon YH. 2008. Effects of feeding citrus by products on nutritional components of Korean native chickens. Korean J Life Sci 18: 1369-1376 https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2008.18.10.1369
  16. Hoffman K, Hamm R, Bluchel E. 1982. Neues uber die bestimmung der Wesserbindung des leisches mit Hilfe der Filterpapierpress methode. Fleischwirtschaft 62: 87-93
  17. Wrolstad RE, Acree TE, Decker EA. 2005. Handbook of food analytical chemistry: pigments, colorants, flavor, texture, and bioactive food components. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey, USA
  18. Blois MS. 1958. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 181: 1199-1200 https://doi.org/10.1038/1811199a0
  19. Lee HJ, Yoo BS, Byun SY. 2000. Differences in phenolic acids between Korean ginsengs and mountain ginsengs. Korean J Biotechnol Bioeng 15: 323-328
  20. Stone H, Sidel JL. 1985. Sensory evaluation practices. Academic press Inc., New York, USA. p 45
  21. SPSS. 1999. SPSS for windows Rel. 10.05. SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA
  22. Livingstone DJ, Brown WD. 1981. The chemistry of myoglobin and its reaction. Food Technol 35: 224-229
  23. Park KS, Jung IC. 2005. Quality and palatability of pork meats fed with fermented wild grape by-product. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 15: 759-765
  24. Ahn BJ, Jang K, Kim SH, Cho NC, Kook G, Choi BH, Sun SC. 2001. Effects of dietary supplements of processed onion on the physicochemical characteristics by store period in duck meat. Korean J Poult Sci 28: 289-295
  25. Han GD, Kim DG, Kim SM, Ahn DH, Sung SK. 1996. Effects of aging on the physico-chemical and morphological properties in the Hanwoo beef by the grade. Korean J Anim Sci 38: 589-596
  26. Jung IC. 1999. Effect of freezing temperature on the quality of beef loin aged after thawing. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 28: 871-875
  27. Song HI, Moon GI, Moon YH, Jung IC. 2000. Quality and storage stability of hamburger during low temperature storage. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 20: 72-78
  28. Kim JS, Kim TY, Kim SB. 2006. Evaluation of the storage characteristics of Kangjung added with gromwell extracts. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 35: 128-134
  29. Li S, Yu H, Ho CT. 2006. Nobiletin: efficient and large quantity isolation from orange peel extract. Biomed Chromatogr 20: 133-138 https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.540
  30. Cambero MI, Seuss I, Honikel KO. 1992. Flavor compounds of beef broth as affected by cooking temperature. J Food Sci 57: 1285-1290 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1992.tb06838.x

Cited by

  1. Effect of Citrus Byproduct on Quality and Fatty Acid Composition of Chicken Eggs vol.20, pp.9, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2010.20.9.1358