A Study of Teaching and Learning Model Development for Engineering Education

  • 투고 : 2009.04.15
  • 심사 : 2009.08.30
  • 발행 : 2009.09.30

초록

본 연구는 차세대 공학인재의 사고의 역량을 개발하기 위한 교수학습 모델을 개발하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 차세대 공학인재가 필요로 하는 사고와 역량을 도출하기 위해 문헌을 검토하고 국내외 사례를 분석하였다. 공학 교육, 특히 핵심소재 분야에서 적용할 수 있는 개념적 교수학습 모델로 테크놀로지의 지원을 통한 과학적 탐구와 창조적 활동을 강조한 SICAT(Scientific Inquiry and Creative Activity with Technology) 모델을 개발하였다. SICAT 모델은 교수 학습 목표에 따라 수업에 바로 적용할 수 있도록 ARDA, CoCD, ReSh 유형으로 구분하였다. 또한, SICAT 교수 학습 모델에 대한 교수자를 위한 가이드북을 개발, 제공하였다. 앞으로, 개발된 모델의 교실 현장 적용과 효과성 분석을 통해 모델의 타당성을 공고히 하고 지속적으로 공학교육을 개선해 나가야 할 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to develop a teaching and learning model for the field of engineering to nurture innovative thinking and competency in engineering elites of the next generation. We have reviewed the literature to find out the necessary thinking and capabilities required for the next-generation engineers, and analyzing domestic and international case studies. As a result, we have created Scientific Inquiry and Creative Activity with Technology (SICAT) as a teaching and learning model applicable for the Fusion Materials field. SICAT model is classified ARDA, CoCD, ReSh type to apply directly in class according to teaching and learning objective. And we developed SICAT teaching and learning model guidebook for teachers. In near future, It should be consolidated the validity of the model and improved succeedingly in engineering education through applying and analyzing effectiveness in classes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bankel, J. Berggren, K., Blom, K., Crawley, E., Wiklund, I., Ostlund, S.(2002). The CDIO syllabus: A Comparative study of expected student proficiency. European Journal of Engineering Education, 28(3), 297-315
  2. Eggermont M. Freiheit, T. & Brennan R.(2006). An inquiry and blended learning module for senior engineering design. Online: http://www.cden2006.utoronto.ca/data/10056.pdf
  3. Foulds, R. A., Bergen, M. & Mantilla, B. A. (2003). Integrated biomedical engineering education using studio-based learning. IEEE Engineering in medicine and biology magazine, 22(4) 92-100 https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMB.2003.1237508
  4. Glatz, C. E., Gonzalez, R., Huba, M. E., Mallapragada, S. K, Narasimhan, B., Reilly, P. J., Saunders, K. P., & Shanks, J. V. (2005). Problembased learning biotechnology courses in chemical engineering. Online: http://www.aseanbiotechnology.info/Abstract/21018717.pdf
  5. Kim, D. Y., Kim, K. S., Kim, P. W., Rho, T. C., Ryu, C. Y., Chol, W. C. (2006). A study on the Constituents of Engineering Basic Competency based on the Recognition of Engineers in the Field. Journal of Korean Society for Engineering Education, 9(2), 34-51
  6. Kwon, S. H, Shin, D. W., Kang, K. H, (2008). Exploring on teaching and learning strategies throughing case of foreign cases. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 11(3). 12-23 https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2008.11.3.12
  7. Kwon, S. H, Kang, K. H, Oh, H. S, Jeung, S. H. (2008). SICAT teaching and learning model guidebook for teachers. Published in Institute of Educational Technology, Hanyang University
  8. Meyer(2005). Capstone design outcome assessment:Instruments for quantitative evaluation. 35th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference
  9. Paretti, M.(2005). Using project portfolios to assess design in materials science and engineering. Proceedings of the 2005 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition
  10. Paretti, M. & Burgoyne.(2005). Integrating engineering and communication: A study of capstone design course. 35th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference
  11. Saunders, K., Glatz, C., Huba, M., Griffin, M. Mallapragada, S., Shanks, J.(2003). Using rubrics to facilitate students' development of problem solving skills. Proceedings of the 2003 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition