The Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone in Knee Joint

무릎관절 해면뼈의 기계적 물성

  • Kwak, Dai-Soon (Department of Anatomy / Catholic Institute for Applied Anatomy, Catholic Univ.) ;
  • Oh, Taek-Yul (College of Advanced Technology, KyungHee Univ.) ;
  • Han, Seung-Ho (Department of Anatomy / Catholic Institute for Applied Anatomy, Catholic Univ.)
  • 곽대순 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 해부학교실 / 응용해부연구소) ;
  • 오택열 (경희대학교 테크노공학대학) ;
  • 한승호 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 해부학교실 / 응용해부연구소)
  • Published : 2009.06.01

Abstract

In this study, we performed the compressive strength test of trabecular bone in knee joint for measuring the elastic modulus and ultimate strength. The main knee joint is femorotibial articulation between the lateral and medial femorotibial condyle. In the case of osteoarthritis, some patients have only medial condylar osteoarthritis. We performed the mechanical test for comparison the difference of the each condylar strength. We used diamond core-drill and linear precision saw for making the specimens. Specimens were cored from both condyle in distal femur and proximal tibia in fresh cadaver (male 10, female 12), and tested by universal test machine with temperature control saline circulation system. Results of the test in distal femoral parts, averaged elastic modulus was $360.61{\pm}159.40MPa$ for male, $150.89{\pm}70.65MPa$ for female. Averaged ultimate strength was $6.79{\pm}2.91MPa$ for male, $2.89{\pm}1.31MPa$ for female. Male was 2.4 times stronger than female. In the proximal tibial parts, averaged elastic modulus was $108.80{\pm}52.88MPa$ for male, $73.45{\pm}55.06MPa$ for female. Averaged ultimate strength was $2.59{\pm}1.39MPa$ for male, $1.75{\pm}1.16MPa$ for female. Male was 1.5 times stronger than female. In the distal femoral condyle, medial condyle had more strength than lateral condyle at middle region. But lateral condyle had more strength than medial condyle at anterior & posterior regions (p<0.02). In the proximal tibial condyle, medial condyle had more strength than lateral condyle. (p<0.01).

Keywords

References

  1. Roe, S. C., Pijanowski, G. J. and Johnson, A. L., "Biomechanical properties of canine cortical bone allografts : effects of preparation and storage," Am. J. Vet. Res., Vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 873-877, 1985
  2. Linde, F. and Sorensen, H. C., "The effect of different stroage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone," J. Biomechanics, Vol. 26, No. 1249, pp. 1249-1252, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90072-M
  3. Johnson, F., Leitl, S. and Waugh, W., "The distribution of load across the knee : A comparison of static and dynamic measurements," J. Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 346-349, 1980
  4. Carr, A., Keyes, G., Miller, R., O'Connor, J. and Goodfellow, J., "Medial uni-compartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee," Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., No. 295, pp. 205-213, 1993
  5. Keyes, G. W., Carr, A. J., Miller, R. K. andGoodfellow, J. W., "The radiographic classification of medial gonarthrosis : correlation with operation methods in 200 knees," Acta Orthop. Scand., Vol. 63, No. 5, pp. 497-501, 1992 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679209154722