DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Determinants of the Use of Opportunistic Screening Programs in Korea

민간검진 서비스의 이용현황과 결정요인

  • Kang, Sung-Wook (Department of Public Health, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • You, Chang-Hoon (School of Business, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kwon, Young-Dae (Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 강성욱 (대구한의대학교 보건학부) ;
  • 유창훈 (연세대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 권영대 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 인문사회의학과)
  • Published : 2009.05.31

Abstract

Objectives : Both organized and opportunistic screening programs have been widely used in Korea. This paper examined the determinants of the use of opportunistic screening programs in Korea. Methods : The subjects were a national stratified random sample of 10,254 people aged 45 or older from the first wave of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing in 2006. A logit model was used to examine the determinants of the use of opportunistic screening programs in terms of the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, the type of health insurance and the health status. Results : Thirteen point seven percent of the individuals received opportunistic screening programs within 2 years from the time the survey was conducted in 2006. The individuals who graduated from college or who had even more education were 3.0 times more likely to use opportunistic screening programs compared with the individuals who were illiterate. The individuals who resided in urban areas and who had religious beliefs were more likely to receive opportunistic screening programs compared with their counterparts. Those who were in the first quartile for the total household assets were 2.6 times more likely to use opportunistic screening programs than those who were in the fourth quartile for the total household assets. Privately insured people were 1.6 times more likely to use opportunistic screening programs than those who were not insured. Finally, the individuals who self-assessed their health status as worst were 2.1 times more likely to use opportunistic screening programs compared individuals who self-assessed their health status as best. Conclusions : This study suggests that opportunistic screening programs can be an indicator for whether or not an individual is among the advantaged group in terms of their socioeconomic characteristics and type of health insurance.

Keywords

References

  1. Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Edwards NM, Flottemesch TJ, Goodman MJ, Solberg LI, Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: Results of a systematic review and analysis, Am J Prev Med 2006;31(1): 52-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.012
  2. Cho HI, Current status of health screening in Korea, J Korea Assoc Health Promot 2004;2(2):215-230 (Korean)
  3. Kim HK, Ryu HG, Factors affecting the satisfaction and revisit intention of health promotion center in a university hospital, Korean J Hosp Manage 2001;6(3):5-24 (Korean)
  4. Shin YS, Park CY, Jung SH, Jung YJ, Kang HY, Comparison of customer satisfaction with health examination programs provided by the Korea National Health Insurance and private healthcare organizations in Korea, J Korean Soc Qual Assur Health Care 2006;12(1):40-51(Korean)
  5. National Cancer Information Center, Cancer News, Goyang: National Cancer Center;c2008 [cited 2009 Jan 24], Available from: URL: http://www.cancer.go.kr/cms/data/news/122260 1_1614.html (Korean)
  6. Yang HJ, Lee JS, Kim JS, Lee JK, Evaluation of scientific evidence for screening tests provided by some hospitals in Korea, J Korean Acad Fam Med 2006;27(9): 723-732 (Korean)
  7. Burton LC, Steinwachs DM, German PS, Shapiro S, Brant LJ, Richards TM, et al, Preventive services for the elderly: Would coverage affect utilization and costs under Medicare? Am J Pubic Health 1995;85(3):387-391 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.85.3.387
  8. Cohen JT, Neumann PJ, Weinstein MC, Doespreventive care save money? Health economicsand the presidential candidates, N Eng J Med 2008; 358(7): 661-663 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0708558
  9. Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Developing a Method to Attract Foreign Patients for Upbringing Healthcare Services Industry, Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute; 2006 (Korean)
  10. Yano Research Institute, The Present Status and the Prospect of Health Examination Market, Tokyo: Yano Research Institute;2007(Japanese)
  11. Japan Hospital Association, The Present Status of Health Examination in 2007, Tokyo:Japan Hospital Association;2008 (Japanese)
  12. Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Developing Strategic Method to Branch out Korean Healthcare Services into the Asian Market and Attract Foreign Patients, Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2006(Korean)
  13. Sung MH, Characteristics of individuals seeking comprehensive health check-ups, J Korean Acad Nurs 1997;27(3): 563-576(Korean)
  14. Yoo SY, Lee JY, Yoon SJ, An HG, A study on factors related with a periodic general health examination, J Korean Data Anal Soc 2008;10(1):119-131(Korean)
  15. Health and Retirement Survey (HRS), Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan;c2009 [cited 2008 Dec 20] Available from: URL: http://hrsonline.isr umich.edu
  16. Survey of Health, Ageing, Retirement in Europe (SHARE), Mannheim: SHARE Project Team; c2008 [cited 2008 Dec 20], Available from:URL:http://www.shareproject.org/
  17. Lee SA, Choi KS, Hwang SY, Lee JY, Park EC, Lee KJ, et al, The effect of socioeconomic factors on health screening in Korea: The 2001 Korean National Examination Health and Nutrition Surveys (KNEHANS) J Korean Assoc Cancer Prev 2004; 9(3):188-198(Korean)
  18. National Health Insurance Corporation, Satisfaction Investigation of Health Screening Participants, Seoul: National Health Insurance Corporation; 2007(Korean)
  19. Khang YH, Lynch JW, Yun S, Lee Si, Trends in socioeconomic health inequalities in Korea: Use of mortality and morbidity measures, J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58(4):308-314 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.012989
  20. Son M. Commentary: Why the educational effect is so strong in differentials of mortality in Korea? Int J Epidemiol 2004; 33(2): 308-310 https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh017
  21. Khang YH, Kang M, Kim MH, Shin YI, Yoo WS, Yoon TH, et al, Developing Indicators of Equity in Health and Monitoring Magnitude of Socioeconomic Inequality in Health Gwachon: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2006(Korean)
  22. An CB, Jeon SH, Intergenerational transfer of educational achievement and household income, Korean J Public Finance 2008; 1(1):119-142(Korean)
  23. Chun HR, Kim IH, Socioeconomic inequalities in preventive services among the elderly: Results from medical checkup, cancer check, and BP check, J Prev Med Public Health 2007; 40(5): 404-410 (Korean) https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.5.404
  24. Chun EJ, Jang SN, Cho SI, Cho YT, Moon OR, Disparities in participation in health examination by socio-economic position among adult Seoul residents, J Prev Med Public Health 2007;40(5): 345-350 (Korean) https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.5.345
  25. Yoon TH, Hwang IK, Sohn HS, Koh KW, Jeong BG, The determinants of private health insurance purchasing decisions under national health insurance system in Korea: The expanding of private health insurance market, for the better or worse, Korean J Health Policy Adm 2005;15(4):161-175 (Korean) https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2005.15.4.161
  26. Jung KT, Shin EK, Kwak CH. An empirical study on the relationship between private health insurance and moral hazard. Korean Insur J 2006;75(1):1-25(Korean)
  27. Finkelstein MM, Preventive screening. What factors influence testing? Can Fam Physician 2002;48:1494-1501
  28. Sambamoorthi U, McAlpine DD, Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and access disparities in the use of preventive services among women, Prev Med 2003;37(5): 475-484 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00172-5
  29. Patel R, Lawlor DA, Ebrahim S. Socioeconomic position and the use of preventive health care in older British women: A crosssectional study using data from the British Women s Heart and Health Study cohort, Fam Pract 2007; 24(1): 7-10 https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cml064

Cited by

  1. Demographic and Socioeconomic Determinants of the Use of Periodic Health Examinations: Public vs. Private Sector vol.219, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.219.223
  2. 건강보험 건강검진 대상자들의 예방적 의료서비스 이용 특성 vol.11, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2011.11.2.331
  3. Mode of primary cancer detection as an indicator of screening practice for second primary cancer in cancer survivors: a nationwide survey in Korea vol.12, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-557
  4. 일개 종합병원의 민간 건강검진 수검자의 검진이용 특성, 건강행태 및 건강관리 수준 분석 vol.14, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2013.14.1.301
  5. 일개 종합병원의 민간 건강검진 수검자의 검진이용 특성, 건강행태 및 건강관리 수준 분석 vol.14, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2013.14.1.301
  6. Equity in health care: current situation in South Korea vol.56, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2013.56.3.184
  7. Factors Affecting Diabetic Screening Behavior of Korean Adults: A Multilevel Analysis vol.7, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2013.04.002
  8. 사회적 지지 및 사회 심리적 요인과 노인의 건강행태와의 관련성 vol.23, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2013.23.2.162
  9. 치기공과 재학생의 건강관련 심신 자각증상에 관한 연구 vol.35, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2013.35.2.157
  10. 우리나라 20세 이상 장애인 건강검진 수검률 추이 및 관련 요인분석 vol.24, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2014.24.2.172
  11. 민간검진이용자의 재검진 결정요인에 관한 연구 vol.13, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2015.13.1.383
  12. 건강검진 수검 및 검진유형 선택의 결정요인 vol.10, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2016.10.2.083
  13. Perception about Age at the Start and End of Periodic Health Examinations: a Survey-based Study on University Hospital in Korea vol.17, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.15384/kjhp.2017.17.3.161
  14. Participation inequality in the National General Health Examination based on enterprise size vol.29, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-017-0159-y
  15. Effectiveness of workers’ general health examination in Korea by health examination period and compliance: retrospective cohort study using nationwide data vol.29, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-017-0160-5
  16. A Study on Longitudinal Associations between Health Screening and Health Behaviors among Older Adults vol.43, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21032/jhis.2018.43.1.26
  17. Determinants of undergoing thyroid cancer screening in Korean women: a cross-sectional analysis from the K-Stori 2016 vol.9, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026366
  18. Kano 모델 및 PCSI 지수를 활용한 종합건강검진 의료서비스 품질에 대한 실증적 연구 vol.10, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2019.vol10.no7.71