Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society

The Korean Data and Information Science Society (한국데이터정보과학회)
권호 표지

An empirical study on the roles of attitudes and attitude strength in stimulus-based decision-making

자극기반 의사결정과정에서 태도와 태도강도의 역할에 관한 실증연구

  • Beom, Sang-Kyu (Department of Business Administration, Konkuk University) ;
  • Song, Kyun-Suk (Department of Business Administration, Konkuk University)
  • Published : 2009.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research has found logical data directly influencing forming consideration set and attitude and attitude strength under the choosing situation based on memory-base proposed by Priester et. al (2004). We've examined the possibility of model extension through physical salient strength according to the location of product display as an external stimulate factor and attitude and attitude strength, consideration set and role on variable choice. Especially, this research practically proposed the method measuring directly the attitude on behavior instead of seeing the intension of behavior or behavior by measuring the behavior itself based on existing experiment methods and applied logistics regression analysis. In conclusion, this research confirmed the possibility of generalization of this model by verifying appropriateness through logical background and actual analysis based on stimulus-base proposed model characters as an integrated model relation between attitude in stimulus-based relation and decision-making.

본 연구는 Priester 등 (2004)에 의해서 제시된 기억기반 선택상황에서 태도-의사결정 통합모형인 '고려상표군과 선택에 대한 태도 및 태도강도의 영향모형'을 자극기반 선택상황으로 확장하였다. 즉 태도 및 태도강도가 고려상표군과 선택변수에 대한 역할 (모형 타당성측면)과 외부자극 요소인 제품 디스플레이 위치에 따른 물리적 현저성 강도의 역할 (모형 일반화측면)을 통해 모형의 확장가능성을 검토하였다. 본 연구는 기존 연구와 같이 태도 그 자체를 측정하여 행동이나 행동의도를 파악하는 대신에 '행동에 대한 태도'를 직접 측정할 수 있는 실험조사 방법을 토대로 로지스틱 회귀분석을 통해 실증적으로 분석하였다. 본 연구 결과는 기억기반에서 태도-의사결정간의 관련성에 대한 통합모형으로 제시된 모형의 특성들을 자극기반 상황에서 이론적 배경과 실증분석을 통해 모형타당성을 확인하여 모형의 일반화 가능성을 보여주었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 이학식, 김영 (1998). 태도-행동 관계에 대한 조정변수들의 역할-대선 투표행동의 체계에서-. <소비자학 연구>, 9, 37-64.
  2. 이학식, 임지훈 (2006). , 법문사, 서울.
  3. 소비자프로파일리서치협의회 (2005). <소비자 프로파일 리서치>, 소비자프로파일리서치협의회, 서울.
  4. Ajzen, I., Timko, C. and White, J. B. (1982). Self-monitoring and the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 426-435. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.3.426
  5. Coupey, E. (1994). Restructuring: Constructive processing of information displays in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1086/209384
  6. Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C. and Williams, C. J. (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-tobehavior process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 280-288. https://doi.org/10.1086/209214
  7. Howard, A. J. and Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
  8. Kim, M. J. (2008). Analysis of multicategory responses with logit model on earlyold age pension. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 19, 25-36.
  9. Nedungadi, P. (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1086/208556
  10. Posavac, S. S., Sanbonmatsu, D. M. and Fazio, R. H. (1997). Considering the best choice: Effects of the salience and accessibility of alternatives on attitude-decision consistency. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 72, 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.253
  11. Priester, J. R., Nayakankuppam, D., Fleming, M. A. and Godek, J. (2004). The A2SC2 model: The influence of attitudes and attitude strength on consideration and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 574-587. https://doi.org/10.1086/380290
  12. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. and Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility asa determinant of an object's attraction of visual stimulation. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 63, 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.198
  13. Russo, J. E., Meloy, M. G. and Medvec, V. H. (1998). Predecisional distortion of product information. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 438-452. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152163
  14. Seok, K. H. (2008). Data-adaptive ECOC for multicategory classification. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 19, 735-749.