Journal of Ecology and Environment

한국생태학회 (The Ecological Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Colonization and Extinction Patterns of a Metapopulation of Gold-spotted Pond Frogs, Rana plancyi chosenica

  • Park, Dae-Sik (Division of Science Education, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Shi-Ryong (Department of Biology Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Sung, Ha-Cheol (Department of Biology Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 발행 : 2009.05.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

We investigated colonization and extinction patterns in a meta population of the gold-spotted pond frog (Rana planeyi ehoseniea) near the Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea, by surveying the frogs in the nine occupied habitat patches in the study area four times per breeding season for three years (2006$\sim$2008) and recording whether the patches were occupied by frogs as well as how many frogs were calling in the patches. We then developed five a priori year-specific models using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The models predicted that: 1) probabilities of colonization and local extinction of the frogs were better explained by year-dependent models than by constant models, 2) there are high local extinction and low colonization probabilities, 3) approximately 31% number of patches will be occupied at equilibrium, and 4) that considerable variation in occupation rate should occur over a 30-year period, due to demographic stochasticity (in our model, the occupation rate ranged from 0.222 to 0.889). Our results suggest that colonization is important in this metapopulation system, which is governed by mainly stochastic components, and that more constructive conservation effects are needed to increase local colonization rates.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alford RA, Richards SJ. 1999. Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 30: 133-165 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.133
  2. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 1998. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. New York: Springer
  3. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: APractical Information-theoretic Approach, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York
  4. Clinchy M, Krebs CJ, Jarman PI. 2001. Dispersal sinks and handling effects: interpreting the role of immigration in common brushtail possum populations. J Anim Ecol 70: 515-526 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00510.x
  5. Dodd CK, Smith LI. 2003. Habitat destruction and alteration: historical trends and future prospects for amphibians. In Amphibian Conservation (Semlitsch RD, ed). Smithsonian Institution, Washington, pp 94-112
  6. Fryxell JM. 2001. Habitat suitability and source-sink dynamics of beavers. J Anim Ecol 70: 310-316 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00492.x
  7. Gilpin ME, Diamond JM. 1976. Calculation of immigration and extinction curves from the species-area-distance relation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 73: 4130-4134 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.73.11.4130
  8. Gilpin ME, Hanski IA. 1991. Metapopulation Dynamics: Empirical and Theoretical investigations. Academic Press. San Diego
  9. Goodman D. 1987. The demography of chance extinction. In Viable Populations for Conservation. (Soule ME, ed), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 11-34
  10. Gotelli NJ. 1998. A Primer of Ecology, 2nd edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
  11. Gotelli NJ. 2001. A Primer of Ecology, 3rd edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
  12. Gu W, Swihart RK. 2003. Are patch occupancy data sufficient for inferring metapopulation dynamics using spatially explicit patch occupancy models? Acta Zool Sinica 49: 787-794
  13. Hanski I, Pakkala T, Kuussaari M, Lei G. 1995. Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72: 21-28 https://doi.org/10.2307/3546033
  14. Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE. 2004. Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations, Academic Press, San Diego
  15. Harrison S, Murphy DD, Ehrlich PR. 1988. Distribution of the bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydras editha bayensis: evidence for a metapopulation model. Am Nat 132: 360-382 https://doi.org/10.1086/284858
  16. Levins R. 1970. Extinction. in: Some Mathematical Problems in Biology (Desternhaber M, ed), American Mathematical Society, Providence, pp 77-107
  17. Lopez IE, Pfister CA. 2001. Local population dynamics in metapopulation models: implications for conservation. Conserv Biol 15: 1700-1709 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00140.x
  18. McDiarmid RW, Dounelly MA. 1994. Supplemental approaches to studying amphibian biodiversity. Group activities and field trips. In Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity (Heyer RH, Donnelly MA, McDiarmid RW, Hayek LC, Foster MS, eds). Standard Methods for Amphibians, pp 175-182
  19. MacKenzie DI. 2005. What are the issues with presence-absence data for wildlife managers? J Wildlife Management 69: 849-860 https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0849:WATIWP]2.0.CO;2
  20. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83: 2248-2255 https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:ESORWD]2.0.CO;2
  21. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Hines IE, Knutson MG, Franklin AB. 2003: Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology 84: 2200-2207 https://doi.org/10.1890/02-3090
  22. MacKenzie, DI, Nichols JD, Royle JA, Pollock KH, Bailey LL, Hines JE. 2006. Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence. Elsevier, San Diego, California
  23. Moilanen A. 1999. Patch occupancy models of metapopulation dynamics: Efficient parameter estimation using implicit statistical inference. Ecology 80: 1031-1043 https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1031:POMOMD]2.0.CO;2
  24. Pellet J, Schmidt BR. 2005. Monitoring distributions using call surveys: estimating site occupancy, detection probabilities and inferring absence. Biol Conserv 123: 27-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.10.005
  25. Pellet J, Fleishman E, Dobkin DS, Gander A, Murphy D. 2007. An empirical evaluation of the area and isolation paradigm of metapopulation dynamics. Biol Conserv 136: 483-495 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.12.020
  26. Pope SE, Fahrig, L, Merriam HG. 2000. Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations. Ecology 81: 2498-2508 https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2498:LCAMEO]2.0.CO;2
  27. Ra NY, Sung HA, Cheong S, Lee JH, Eom J, Park D. 2008. Habitat use and home range of the endangered gold-spotted pond frog (Rana chosenica). Zool Sci 25: 894-903 https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.25.894
  28. Smith MA, Green DM. 2005. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28: 110-128 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x
  29. Sjogren P. 1991. Extinction and isolation gradients in metapopulations: the case of the pool frog (Rana lessonae). Biol J Linn Soc 42: 135-147 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00556.x
  30. Skelly DK, Meir E. 1997. Rule-based models for evaluating mechanisms of distributional change. Conserv Biol 11: 531-538 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95415.x
  31. Skelly DK, Werner EE, Cortwright SA. 1999. Long-term distributional dynamies of a Miehigan amphibian assemblage. Ecology 80: 2326-2337 https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2326:LTDDOA]2.0.CO;2
  32. Sung, HC, Kim SK, Park SR, Park DS. 2005. Effectiveness of mating call playbacks in anuran call monitoring: a case study of threestriped pond frogs (Rana nigromaculata). Integ Bios 9: 199-203 https://doi.org/10.1080/17386357.2005.9647271
  33. Sung HC, Cha SM, Kim SK, Park DS, Park SR, Cheong SK. 2007. Monitoring extensive breeding populations and daily eall activity of the gold-spotted pond frog, Rana chosenica in Chungju City and Chungwon Gun. Korean J Environ Biol 25: 94-99
  34. Vuilleumier S, Wilcox C, Cairns BJ, Possingham HP. 2007. How patch configuration affects the impact of disturbances on metapopulation persistence. Theor Popul Biol 72: 77-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2006.11.001
  35. Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

피인용 문헌

  1. vol.74, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1655/Herpetologica-D-17-00011