Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회지)

Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on a Revised Conspectus Model for the Assessment of Electronic Resources

전자자원 선정을 위한 컨스펙터스 수정 모형 연구

  • Published : 2009.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The conspectus, based on a set number of subject descriptors derived essentially from LC subject classifications, provides a consistent framework within which libraries could report subject intensity. While library collection development has been benefitted by using this conspectus, its effectiveness in this digital era is under controversy. The purpose of this study is to survey the concepts and the various types of conspectus in library collection development and to test the applicability of a revised conspectus model to electronic resource management in libraries. For this, the focus was especially put on investigating the characteristics of electronic resources as considered the collection depth usually identified in collection development policies. Previous research has been also surveyed to consolidate their outcomes in order to design a matrix model of conspectus, which put the characteristics, persistence, and collection level in consideration in oder for the design of the conspectus model.

이 연구는 전자자원 선정에 있어서 컨스펙터스의 적용가능성을 가늠하고자 한 연구이다. 컨스펙터스는 원래 단위 도서관에 있어서 주제분야별 자료 수집의 수준을 규정하기 위한 도구이지만 기존 인쇄기반 자료의 평가에 초점이 맞추어져 있다. 따라서 전자자원이 급속히 증가하면서 발생하는 한계점들이 지적되고 있기도 하다. 이에 따라 전자자원의 선정에 있어서도 적용 가능한 수정된 컨스펙터스 모형을 제시하고자 하는 것이 이 연구의 목적이다. 이를 위하여 우선 컨스펙터스의 발전과정을 개괄하고 물리적 장서개발에 있어서 컨스펙터스의 중요성을 일별하였다. 이어서 전자자원의 속성을 고려하여 컨스펙터스를 수정, 제안한 연구들에서 제시한 모형들의 주요 특성을 조사한 후 주요 논점들을 종합하여 전자자원의 선정에 참고할 수 있는 컨스펙터스 모형을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 송영희 외. 2005. 디지털시대의 장서관리. 서울: 한국도서관협회.
  2. 박진희. 1998. 컨스펙터스방법을 이용한 장서평가 연구. 정보관리학회지, 15(2): 163-191.
  3. Allen, B. M. and G. N. Olson eds. 1994. Cooperative collection management: The conspectus approach. New York, Neal-Schuman.
  4. Biblaz, D. 2001. Guidelines for a collection development policy using the conspectus model. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions Section on Acquisition and Collection Development.
  5. Bond, M. 1998. Embracing Electronic Access: Renovating Conspectus for the Digital Era. National Initiatives and Collaboration Branch, National Library of Australia presented at the VALA Conference, Melbourne, 28th-30th, January, 1998. .
  6. Burke, J. Renovating Conspectus for the Digital Era: Applied at Queensland University of Technology. Australian Libraries Gateway(ALG): Embracing Electronic Access, NLA. .
  7. Bushing, M. 1992. The conspectus: Possible process and useful product for the ordinary library. In R.J. Wood & K. Strauch Collection assessment: A look at the RLG Conspectus. The Acquisitions Librarian, 7: 81-95.
  8. Bushing, M., D. Burns. and N. Powell. 1997. Using the Conspectus Method: A Collection Assessment Handbook. Lacey, Washington: WLN.
  9. Calang, M., K. Tabata. and S. Sugimoto. 2002. Linking collection management policy to metadata for preservation, Proceedings of International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata for e-Communication: 35-43.
  10. Clayton, P. and G. E. Gorman. 2002. Updating conspectus for a digital age. Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical Services, 26: 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1464-9055(02)00248-8
  11. Evans, G. E. and M. Z. Saponaro. 2005. Developing library and information center collections. Littleton, CO, Libraries Unlimited.
  12. Ferguson, A. W., J. Grant. and J. S. Rustein. 1988. The RLG Conspectus, Its Use and Benefits. College and Research Libraries. 49(2): 197-206. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_49_03_197
  13. Jakimow, R. 1996. Model for the recording of preservation and conservation activity (The Australian Conspectus, Information Sheet no. 9). Canberra, AU: National Library of Australia, DNC Office.
  14. Johnson, P. 2004. Fundamentals of Collection Development & Management, Chicago, ALA.
  15. Kyrillidou, Martha and Mark Young. 2008. ARL Statistics 2005-06, Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
  16. Munroe, M. H and J. E. Ver Steeg. 2004. The decisionmaking process in conspectus evaluation of collections. Library Quarterly, 74(2): 181-205. https://doi.org/10.1086/382846
  17. Powell, N. 1994. Using the WLN conspectus in a nonautomated environment. Collection Building, 13(2-3): 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb023375
  18. Powell, N. and M. Bushing. 1992. WLN Collection Assessment Manual (4th ed). Lacey, Washington: WLN.