Effects of the Variation of Silyl Hydride-to-Vinyl Ratios in Dental Polyvinylsiloxane Impression Materials

실리콘 폴리머의 비닐그룹에 대한 가교제의 Si-H 비율이 폴리비닐실록산 치과용 인상재의 물성에 미치는 영향

  • Ju, Dong-Hyun (Dept. of Dental Materials and Dental Materials Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Young-Hwa (Dept. of Dental Materials and Dental Materials Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Song, Ho-Jun (Dept. of Dental Materials and Dental Materials Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Chang-Nam (Faculty of Applied Science and The Research Institute for Catalyst, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Yeong-Joon (Dept. of Dental Materials and Dental Materials Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 주동현 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과재료학교실 및 치과재료연구소) ;
  • 정영화 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과재료학교실 및 치과재료연구소) ;
  • 송호준 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과재료학교실 및 치과재료연구소) ;
  • 최창남 (전남대학교 응용화학공학부 및 촉매연구소) ;
  • 박영준 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과재료학교실 및 치과재료연구소)
  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

This study examined the effects of the concentration variation of the silyl hydride (Si-H) functional group in polymethylhydrogen siloxane cross-linker and the vinyl-functional group in silicone prepolymer on the physical properties of the dental polyvinylsiloxane impression materials (PVS). When the SiH/Vinyl ratio was 1.6 (Group $\underline{C6}$ containing ${\underline{C}}ross$-linker $\underline{6}$ parts), the setting rate was too slow even though their tensile strength was the highest within the tested groups. When the SiH/Vinyl ratio was 3.2 (Group C12), the setting rate was too fast to allow appropriate working time even though their mechanical properties were good. The C14 group showed rather lower tensile strength compared to the groups having lower cross-linker contents. Notably, too much incorporation of cross-linker, like C16 group, induced delay of the setting, by which the mechanical and manipulation properties were detrimentally affected.

본 연구는 폴리비닐실록산 치과용 고무인상재의 조성에서 실리콘 프리폴리머 내 비닐그룹에 대한 가교제내 Si-H 그룹의 함량비 차이가 물성에 미치는 영향을 평가하였다. SiH/Vinyl 비가 1.6으로 가교제 함량이 낮은 $\underline{C6}$군(Cross-linker $\underline{6}$ parts 함유)은 인장강도가 실험군 중 가장 높았으나 경화속도가 너무 느렸고, SiH/Vinyl 비가 3.2인 C12군은 기계적 성질은 좋았으나 경화가 너무 빠르게 진행되어 조작이 용이하지 않은 단점을 보였다. 그러나 C14군은 가교제 함량이 더 낮은 실험군들에 비해 낮은 인장강도를 보였으며, C16군은 경화반응이 오히려 더 지연됨을 보여 과다한 가교제 첨가는 기계적 성질과 조작성에 불리한 영향을 미침을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. A. G. Andreopoulos, G. L. Polyzois, and P. P. Demetriou, 'Shrinkage mechanism of elastomeric impression materials', J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 7, 235 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01730181
  2. J. H. Lai, L. L. Wang, C. C. Ko, R. L. DeLong, and J. S. Hodges, 'New organosilicon maxillofacial prosthetic materials', Dent. Mater., 18, 281 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00050-1
  3. K. J. Anusavice, 'Skinner's science of dental materials', 11th ed., p. 205-231, Saunders Press, St. Louis, 2003
  4. R. G. Craig and J. M. Powers, 'Restorative dental material', 11th ed., p. 353-365, Mosby Inc. Press, St. Louis, 2002
  5. G. H. Johnson and R. G. Craig, 'Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models', J. Prosthet. Dent., 53, 484 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90630-4
  6. R. G. Craig, 'Evaluation of an automatic mixing system for an addition silicone impression material', J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 110, 213 (1985) https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1985.0248
  7. A. M. Lacy, H. Fukui, T. Bellman, and M. D. Jendresen, 'Timedependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part II:Polyether, polysulfides, and polyvinylsiloxane', J. Prosthet. Dent., 45, 329 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90400-5
  8. G. L. Yeh, J. M. Powers, and R. G. Craig, 'Properties of addition-type silicone impression materials', J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 101, 482 (1980) https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1980.0321
  9. J. F. McCabe and H. J. Wilson, 'Addition curing silicone rubber impression materials. An appraisal of their physical properties', Brit. Dent. J., 145, 17 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804105
  10. 김영철, '의료용 실리콘 고무의 응용', Rubber Technol., 2, 81 (2001)
  11. W. Finger and M. Ohsawa, 'Effect of mixing ratio on properties of elastomeric dental impression materials' Dent. Mater., 2, 183 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80033-1
  12. J. G. Stannard and R. G. Craig, 'Modifying the setting rate of an addition-type silicone impression material', J. Dent. Res., 58, 1377 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345790580041301
  13. H. Makoto, K. Naoyuki , K. Michio, I. Kazunori, and H. Hisao, 'The effect of filler content on properties of polyaddition-type silicone impression material', Dent. Mater. J., 9, 326 (1990)
  14. J. R. Williams and R. G. Craig, 'Physical properties of addition silicones as a function of composition', J. Oral. Rehabil., 15, 639 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1988.tb00202.x
  15. 오영일, 한경아, 정경호, 김경남, 조리라, '실리콘 고무인상재 개발을 위한 기초연구', Elastomer, 25, 19 (2000)
  16. 강승경, 정경호, '실리콘 고무인상재의 물성에 미치는 충전제의 영향', Elastomer, 41, 157 (2006)
  17. T. Aziz, W. Mark, and J. Robert, 'Development of a new poly(dimethylsiloxane) maxillofacial prosthetic material', J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. Appl. Biomater., 65B, 252 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.10559
  18. T. Aziz, M. Waters, and R. Jagger, 'Analysis of the properties of silicone rubber maxillofacial prosthetic materials', J. Dent., 31, 67 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00084-2
  19. L. A. Kroupa, U.S. Patent 4535141 (1984)
  20. P. Hittmair, W. Hechtl, E. Louis, and E. Wohlfarth, U.S. Patent 4035453 (1977)
  21. K. J. Wynne and J. M. Lambert, 'Encyclopedia of biomaterials and biomedical engineering; Silicones', p. 1348-1362, Marcel Dekker Press, New York, 2004
  22. J. M. Uilk, A. E. Mera, R. B. Fox, and K. J. Wynne, 'Hydrosilation-cured poly(dimethylsiloxane) networks: Intrinsic contact angles via dynamic contact angle analysis', Macromolecules, 36, 3689 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1021/ma021154x
  23. Council on Dental Materials and Devices, 'Revised American Dental Association specification No. 19 for non-aqueous, elastomeric dental impression materials', J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 94, 733 (1977) https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0334
  24. ASTM Committee. Standard test methods for vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic rubbers and thermoplastic elastomers- Tension [D412-98]. New York: American National Standards Institute, 1998
  25. R. G. Craig, N. J. Urquiola, and C. C. Liu, 'Comparison of commercial elastomeric impression materials', Operat. Dent., 15, 94 (1990)