Analysis of dental hygiene curriculum of dental hygiene programs in Korea

치위생 교육과정 분석

  • Received : 2009.10.19
  • Accepted : 2009.12.23
  • Published : 2009.12.30

Abstract

Objectives : This study was to suggest the basic data to develop the national exam contents for dental hygiene by comparing with those of other country. Methods : Several dental hygiene education course results were reviewed, and analyzed the culture subjects, basic major subjects, educational subjects, national exam contents in 3 or 4 years dental hygiene curriculum. Results : In Korea, grades of culture subjects in dental hygiene curriculum were different between 3 and 4 years education course, mean grades were 10.4, and 34.5 respectively. While there were few different between 3 and 4 years education course, mean grades were 36, and 36.5 respectively in foreign country. In Korea, grades of major subjects in dental hygiene curriculum were similar between 3 and 4 years education course as mean grades of 110, while there were different between 3 and 4 years education course, mean grades were 60 and 80 respectively in foreign country. In Korea, number of major subject was higher in 4 years(n=61) than 3 years(n=54). However, it was lower in 4 years(n=27) than in 3 years(n=33) in foreign country. Total grade number was 129 in 3 years, and 145 in 4 years in Korea, while it was 97 in 3 years, and 116 in 4 years in foreign country. By analyzing 3 years education course, culture subject was 9.5%, basic health was 11.2%, oral biology was 11.2%, clinical dentistry was 20.7%, public oral health was 10.4%, oral hygiene care was 35.9%, management of dental clinic was 9.4%, education was 2.8% in Korea. In USA, dental hygiene examination contains practice work as major part, while theory was thought of as most important things in korea. Conclusions : It is necessary to improve learning course of dental hygiene curriculum on the basis of other country's system, and then it could be possible to development of good quality's national examination contents, thus good quality of dental hygiene personnel would be turned out in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. 김종배, 김광수, 김영희 외 7인. 공중구강보건학개론. 서울:고문사;2004.
  2. 최호성. 교육과정 및 평가. 서울:교육과학사 2008.
  3. 대한치위생과교수협의회. 치위생과 교육과정 개발 워크샵. 2003.
  4. 한국보건의료인 국가시험원. 국가시험연보. 1998.
  5. Cronbach LJ. Evaluation for course improvement. Teachers College Record 1963;64:672-683.
  6. Scriven M. New frontiers of evaluation, Evaluation Practice, 1986;7(1):7-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-1633(86)80067-8
  7. 오세원, 정만태, 조민정. 전문대학 치위생과 교육과정 수정.보완에 관한 연구. 광주보건전문대학 논문집 1989;14:285-321.
  8. 이영옥, 원복연, 김인숙, 정순희. 전문대학 치위생과 교육연한 연장에 관한 연구. 치아사랑 1991;4:14-17.
  9. 황미영, 강부월. 치위생과의 전공교육과정에 관한 조사연구. 동남보건대학 논문집 1992;9:425-447.
  10. 권현숙. 현행 전문대학 치위생과 교육과정 분석. 경남대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, 1995.
  11. 김숙향. 치위생사 역할중심 치위생학과 교육과정 모형 개발 연구. 단국대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 1997.
  12. 황미영. 치과위생사 통합교육과정 모형개발을 위한 탐색. 성신여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 2002.
  13. 대전보건대학. 치위생과 국제표준교육과정 개발. 교육인적자원부. 2007.
  14. 대한치과위생사협회. 치위생과 교과과정(3년제)분석 및 전공심화과정 신설을 위한 표준 교육과정 개발 제안 보고서. 2003.
  15. 대한치과위생사협회.대한치위생(학)과교수협의회. 치위생학의 교육표준화 및 발전방향 연구결과보고서. 2005.
  16. 대한치과위생사협회. 치과위생가의 업무확자에 관한 조사연구. 2004.