A study on the O'Leary index and dental plague index of dental patients

치과내원 환자의 올리어리(O'Leary) 지수와 개별치아의 치면세균막 지수에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2009.07.13
  • Accepted : 2009.09.20
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of the general characteristics of dental patients to their total O'Leary index and individual plaque indexes in a bid to check the oral hygiene state of citizens and evaluate their plaque management ability. The subjects in this study were 288 patients at dental hospitals and clinics in Busan and South Gyeongsang Province. A survey was conducted from September to November 2008. The findings of the study were as follows: 1. Overall, the O'Leary index of the patients investigated stood at 72 percent. By age and gender, the O'Leary index was highest among those in their 30s(83%) and among the women(75%)(p<.05). As to the influence of toothbrushing frequency, the patients who did it twice or more a day had the highest O'Leary index(75%)(p<.001). By the use of oral hygiene supplies, the patients who used oral hygiene supplies had a higher O'Leary index(76%) than the others who didn't(p<.01). 2. As for plaque index for each tooth, 28 percent of their teeth were given zero point, and 52 percent were given one mark. 13 percent were given two marks, and 6.3 percent were given three marks. Thus, the teeth that were given one mark were largest in number(p<.001). 3. As for plaque index for labial posterior mandibular, 43 percent of their teeth were given one point, and 36 percent were given zero mark. 14 percent were given three mark, and 5 percent were given three marks(p<.01). 4. As for plaque index for buccal posterior maxilla, 57 percent of their teeth were given one point, and 20 percent were given zero mark. 16 percent were given two mark, and 6.3 percent were given three marks(p<.01). 5. As for plaque index for lingual posterior mandibular, 56 percent of their teeth were given one point, and 27.8 percent were given zero mark. 9 percent were given three mark and 6 percent were given three mark(p<.001).

Keywords

References

  1. 김종배, 최유진, 문혁수 외. 예방치학 4판. 서울:고문사;2004:3-6,43-47,282-7.
  2. Suomi JD, Doyle J. Oral hygieneand periodontal disease in an adult population in the United States. J Periodontal 1972;43(11):677-81.
  3. 장기완, 황윤숙, 김진범 외 8명. 구강보건교육학 4판. 서울:고문사;2007:262-264.
  4. 강용주 외. 구강보건통계 및 실제. 서울:나래출판사;2009:110-111.
  5. 이광희. 새로운 치면세균막 착색제 개발을 위한 식용색소의 생체적합성 연구. 대한소아치과학회지 1999;26(1):14-24.
  6. Tan AE, Wade AB. The role of visual feedback by a disclosing agent in plaque control. J Clin Periodontal 1980;7(2):140-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1980.tb01957.x
  7. 장기완, 황윤숙, 백대일 외. 구강보건교육학 3판. 서울:고문사;1999:57-74.
  8. Smith TA., Kroeger RF., Lyon HE., Mullins MR. Evaluating a behavioral method to manage dental fear: a 2-year study of dental practices. J Amer Dent Associate 1990;121(4):525-30.
  9. Sheiham A. Public health aspects of periodontal diseases in Europe. J Clin Periodontal 1991;18(6):362-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02302.x
  10. 김병옥, 김성조, 김종관 등. 치주과학 개정판. 서울:치주과학교수협회;1992:931-937.
  11. Grace E, Cohen L, Ward M. Public Knowledge/ perceptions about AIDS. $\backslash$ transmission. Commu-nity Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992;22:52-55.
  12. Axelsson P, Nystrom B, Lindhe J. the longterm effect of a plague control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal disease in adult. result after 30 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontal 2004;31(9):749-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00563.x
  13. Ramfijord SP: Maintenance care for treated periodontitis patients. J Clin Periodontal. 1987;14(8):433-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1987.tb02247.x
  14. Glavind L: Effect of manthly professional mechanical tooth cleaning on periodontal health in adult. J Clin Periodontal 1977;4(2).
  15. 서은주. 한국인의 구강위생용품 사용실태에 관한 조사연구. 단국대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 2001.
  16. 유정민. 치면세균막 검사법의 임상실험연구. 단국대학교 대학원 석사학위논문 2007.