Group Idea Generation and Simulation

그룹 아이디어 제너레이션을 위한 시뮬레이션 알고리즘의 개발

  • 정종호 (대구가톨릭대학교 경영정보학과)
  • Published : 2009.07.31

Abstract

Electronic brainstorming (EBS) to improve the process and outcomes of group decision making is an artifact of Information Systems legacy. Despite three decades of research with EBS in an effort to become a key resource of organizational performance, its performance when compared to that of nominal is inconclusive because of the recent debate over its usefulness in terms of productivity. Subsequent researchers have directed our attention to the re-examination of cognitive stimulation, which is considered the major benefit in computer-based idea generation, to explain the performance singularity in computer-based groups. While both cognitive and motivational factors that moderate and mediate the group-interaction process remain unexplored, individual differences that are tightly linked to creative behavior have been largely ignored to account for the discrepancy in performance. Since simulations have been widely used in situations where an outcome does not meet the assumptions, the notion of a group simulator and detailed simulation mechanisms are introduced to examine the potential effects of individual differences on the performance of computer-based idea generation groups. In addition, two prior studies that empirically explored cognitive mechanisms with the group simulator are showcased along with six propositions to initiate future research.

Keywords

References

  1. Barki, H. and A. Pinsonneault, 'Small group brainstorming and idea quality : Is electronic brainstorming the most effective approach?' Small Group Research, Vol.32, No.2(2001), pp.158-205 https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200203
  2. Basadur, M., 'Managing creativity: a Japanese Model,' Academy of Management Executive, Vol.6, No.2(1992), pp.29-42
  3. Briggs, R.O., J.F. Nunamaker, and R.H. Sprague, '1001 unanswered research questions in GSS,' Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.14, No.3(1997), pp.3-21 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1997.11518161
  4. Brown, R.T., 'Creativity: What are we to Measure?' In Handbook of Creativity, J.A. Glover, R.R. Ronning, and C.R. Reynolds(eds.). Plenum Press, New York, 1989, pp. 3-32
  5. Brown, B. and P.B. Paulus, 'A simple dynamic model of social factors in group brainstorming,' Small Group Research, Vol.27, No.1(1996), pp.91-114 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496496271005
  6. Brown, B., M. Tumeo, T.S. Larey, and P.B. Paulus, 'Modeling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming,' Small Group Research, Vol.29, No.4(1998), pp.495-526 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496498294005
  7. Cacioppo, J.T. and R.E. Petty, 'The Need for Cognition,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.42, No.1 (1982), pp.116-131 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
  8. Camacho, L.M. and P.B. Paulus, 'The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 68, No.6(1995), pp.1071-1080 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1071
  9. Chung, S., G. Tack, B. Lee, G. Eom, S. Lee, and J. Sohn, 'The effect of 30% oxygen on visuospatial performance and brain activation : An fMRI study,' Brain and Cognition, Vol.56(2004), pp.279-285 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.07.005
  10. CNN.com, 'Surfing the Web with nothing but brainwaves,' Retrieved January Vol.11 (2008), from money.cnn.com/2006/07/21/technology/googlebrain0721.biz2/index.htm
  11. Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal, 'Absorptive capacity : a new perspective on learning and innovation,' Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, No.1 (1990), pp.128-152 https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  12. Connolly, T., L.M. Jessup, and J.S. Valacich, 'Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups,' Management Science, Vol.36, No.6(1990), pp.689-703 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.689
  13. Connolly, T., R.L. Routhieaux, and S.K. Schneider, 'On the effectiveness of group brainstorming test of one underlying cognitive mechanism,' Small Group Research, Vol. 24, No.4(1993), pp.490-503 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496493244004
  14. Corcoran, D.W.T., 'Noise and loss of sleep,' Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol.14, No.3(1962), pp.178-182 https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216208416533
  15. Dalkey, N., The Delphi Method : An Experimental Study of Group Opinion, Rand Corporation, California, 1969
  16. Denning, P., 'Electronic Junk,' Communications of the ACM, Vol.25, No.3(1982), pp.163-165 https://doi.org/10.1145/358453.358454
  17. Dennis, A.R. and J.S. Valacich, 'Computer brainstorms : More heads are better than one,' Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78, No.4(1993), pp.531-537 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.531
  18. Dennis, A.R. and J.S. Valacich, 'Electronic brainstorming : Illusions and patterns of productivity,' Information Systems Re search, Vol.10, No.4(1999), pp.375-377 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.4.375
  19. Dennis, A.R., J.S. Valacich, T. Connolly, and B.E. Wynne, 'Process Structuring in Electronic Brainstorming,' Information Systems Research, Vol.7, No.2 (1996), pp.268-277 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.2.268
  20. Dennis, A.R., J.S. Valacich, T.A. Carte, M.J. Garfield, B.J. Haley, and J.E. Aronson, 'The effectiveness of multiple dialogues in electronic brainstorming,' Information Systems Research, Vol.8, No.2(1997), pp.203-211 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.2.203
  21. Dennis, A.R. and M.L. Williams, 'Electronic brainstorming : Theory, research and future directions,' In Group creativity : Innovation through collaboration, P.B. Paulus and B.A Nijstad (eds.). Oxford University Press, England, 2003, pp.160-178
  22. Devine, D.J. and J.L. Philips, 'Do smarter teams do better: A meta-analysis of cognitive ability and team performance,' Small Group Research, Vol.32, No.5(2001), pp.507-532 https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200501
  23. Dewing, K. and G. Battye, 'Attention deployment and nonverbal fluency,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 17, No.2(1971), pp.214-218 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030307
  24. Diehl, M. and W. Stroebe, 'Productivity loss in brainstorming groups : Toward the solution of riddle,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.53, No.3(1987), pp.497-509 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497
  25. Dugosh, K.L., P.B. Paulus, E.J. Roland, and H. Yang, 'Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.79, No.5(2000), pp.722-735 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.722
  26. Dykes, M. and A. McGhie, 'A comparative study of attentional strategies of schizophrenic and highly creative normal subjects,' British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 128(1976), pp.50-56 https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.128.1.50
  27. Easterbrook, J.A., 'The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior,' Psychological Review, Vol.66, No. 3(1959), pp.183-201 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047707
  28. Elliot, C.D., 'Personality factors and scholastic attainment,' British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.42, No.1 (1972), pp.23-32 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1972.tb00691.x
  29. Engle, R.W., 'Working memory capacity as executive attention,' Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 11 , No.1 (2002), pp.19-23 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160
  30. Evans, J.R. and D.L. Olson, Introduction to Simulation and Risk Analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1998
  31. Eysenck, H.J., The Biological Basis of Personality, Charles C Thomas, IIlinois, 1967
  32. Eysenck, H.J., Personality, Genetics, and Behavior, Praeger Publishers, New York, 1982
  33. Eysenck, M.W., Attention and Arousal, Springer, New York, 1982
  34. Eysenck, H.J., 'The place of individual differences in a scientific psychology,' Annals of Theoretical Psychology, Vol.1 (1984), pp.17-114
  35. Eysenck, H.J. and D. Cookson, 'Personality in primary school children : ability and achievement,' British Journal of Educational Psychology, VoI.39(1969), pp.109-121 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1969.tb02054.x
  36. Gallupe, R.B., L.M. Bastianutti, and W.H. Cooper, 'Unblocking brainstorms,' Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.76, No.1(1991), pp.137-142 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.137
  37. Gallupe, B.R., W.H. Cooper, M. Grise, and L.M. Bastianutti, 'Blocking electronic brainstorms,' Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.79, No.1 (1994), pp.77-86 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.1.77
  38. Gallupe, R.B., A.R. Dennis, W.H. Cooper, J,S. Valacich, L.M. Bastianutti, and J,F. Nunamaker, 'Electronic brainstorming and group size,' Academy of Management Journal, Vol.35, No.2(1992), pp.350-369 https://doi.org/10.2307/256377
  39. Garfield, M.J., N.J, Taylor, A.R. Dennis, and J,W. Satzinger, 'Research report: Modifying paradigms-individual differences, creativity, techniques, and exposure to ideas in group idea generation,' Information Systems Research, Vol.12, No.3(2001), pp.322-333 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.3.322.9710
  40. Gordon, M.E., L.A. Slade, and N. Schmitt, 'The 'science of sophomore' revisited : From conjecture to empiricism,' Academy of Management Review, Vol.11 , No.1(1986), pp.191-207 https://doi.org/10.2307/258340
  41. Grise, M. and R.B. Gallupe, 'Information Overload: Addressing the Productivity Paradox in Face-to-Face Electronic Meetings,' Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.16, No.3(1999), pp.157-185 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518260
  42. Gullestad, M., 'Fighting for a sustainable self-image : The role of descent in individualized identification,' Focal-European Journal of Anthropology, Vol.42(2003), pp.51-62
  43. Gupta, B.S., 'Extraversion and reinforcement in verbal operant conditioning,' British Journal of Psychology, Vol.69(1976), pp.203-206
  44. Hackman, J,R. and C.G. Morris, 'Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness : A review and proposed integration,' Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.8(1975), pp. 45-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60248-8
  45. Hartmann, S., 'The world as a process : Simulations in the natural and social sciences,' In Modelling and simulation in the social sciences from a philosophy of science point of view, R. Hegselmann, U. Mueller, and K.G. Troitzsch (eds.). Springer, New York, 1996, pp.77-100
  46. Hender, J,M., D.L. Dean, T.L. Rodgers, and J,F. Nunamaker, 'An examination of the impact of stimuli type and GSS structure on creativity : Brainstorming versus non-brainstorming techniques in a GSS environment,' Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.18, No.4(2002), pp.59-85 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045705
  47. Heninger, W.G., A.R. Dennis, and K.M. Hilmer, 'Individual cognition and dual-task interference in group support systems,' Information Systems Research, Vol.17, No. 4(2006), pp.415-424 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0102
  48. Henry, R.A., 'The effects of choice and incentives on the overestimation of future performance,' Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.57, No. 2(1994), pp.210-225 https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1012
  49. Henshell, R.L., 'The purposes of laboratory experimentation and the virtues of deliberate artificiality,' Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.16(1980), pp.466-478 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90052-9
  50. Herschel, R.T., T.R. Cooper, L.F. Smith, and L. Arrington, 'Exploring numerical proportions in a unique context : The group support systems meeting environment,' Sex Roles, Vol.31, No.1-2(1994), pp.99-123 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560279
  51. Hilmer, K.M. and A.R. Dennis, 'Stimulating thinking : Cultivating better decisions with groupware through categorization,' Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.17, No.3(2001), pp.93-114
  52. Hiltz, S.R. and M. Turoff, 'Structuring Computer-Mediated Communication Systems to avoid Information Overload,' Communications of the ACM, Vol.28, No.7(1985), pp.680 - 689 https://doi.org/10.1145/3894.3895
  53. Hoffer, J.A and J.S. Valacich, 'Group memory in group support systems : A foundation for design,' In Group Support Systems : New Perspectives, L.M. Jessup and J.S. Valacich (eds.). Macmillan Publishing, New York, 1993, pp.214-229
  54. Howarth, E., 'Some laboratory measures of extraversion-introversion,' Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol.17(1963), pp.55-60 https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1963.17.1.55
  55. Howarth, E. and H.J. Eysenck, 'Extraversion, arousal and paired-associates recall,' Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, VoI.3(1968), pp.114-116
  56. Huber, G.P., 'Cognitive style as a basis for MIS and DSS designs : Much ado about nothing?' Management Science, Vol.29, No.5(1983), pp.567-579 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.5.567
  57. Kane, M.J., K. Bleckley, A.R.A. Conway, and R.W. Engle, 'A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity,' Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, Vol.130, No.2(2001), pp.169-183 https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169
  58. Kasof, J., 'Creativity and breadth of attention,' Creativity Research Journal, Vol.10, No.4(1997), pp.303-315 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1004_2
  59. Kerr, N.L., 'Motivation losses in small groups : a Social dilemma analysis,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.45, No.4(1983), pp.819-828 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.819
  60. Klein, E.E. and D.G. Dologite, 'The role of computer support tools and gender composition in innovative information system idea generation by small groups,' Computers in Human Belnvior, Vol.16, No.2 (2000), pp.111-139 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00013-3
  61. Kleinsmith, L.J. and S. Kaplan, 'Paired associate learning as a function of arousal and interpolated interval,' Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol.65(1963), pp.190-193 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040288
  62. Kramer, T.J., G.P. Fleming, and S.M. Mannis, 'Improving face-to-face brainstorming through modeling and facilitation,' Small Group Research, Vol.32, No.5 (2001), pp.533-557 https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200502
  63. Latane, B., K. Williams, and S. Harkins, 'Many hands make light the work : The causes and consequences of social loafing,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.37, No.6(1979), pp.823-832 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822
  64. Laughlin, P.R. and L.G. Branch, 'Individual versus tetradic performance on a unidimensional complementary task as a function of initial ability level,' Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 8(1972), pp.201-216 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(72)90046-3
  65. Laughlin, P.R, L.G. Branch, and H.H. Johnson, 'Individual versus triadic performance on a unidimensional complementary task as a function of initial ability level,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.12(1969), pp.144-150 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027572
  66. Laughlin, P.R. and H.H. Johnson, 'Group and individual performance on a complementary task as a function of initial ability level,' Journal of Eyperimental Social Psychology, VoI.2(1966), pp.407-414 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(66)90032-1
  67. Lieberman, M.D., 'Introversion and working memory : central executive differences,' Personality and Individual Differences, Vol.28, No.3(2000), pp479-486 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00113-0
  68. Matlin, M.W., Cognition, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, 2003
  69. McGrath, J.E., Judgment Calls in Research, Sage, California, 1982
  70. McGrath, J.E., Groups: Interaction and Performance, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1984
  71. McGrath, J.E., 'Time, interaction, and performance (TIP) : A theory of groups,' Small Group Research, Vol.22, No.2(1991), pp.147-174 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496491222001
  72. Mendelsohn, G., 'Associative and attentional processes in creative performance,' Journal of Personality, Vol.44, No.2(1976), pp.341-369 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00127.x
  73. Mullen, B., 'Operationalizing the Effect of the Group on the Individual: A Self-Attention Perspective,' Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.19, No.4(1983), pp.295-322 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90025-2
  74. Mullen, B., C. Johnson, and E. Salas, 'Productivity loss in brainstorming groups : A meta-analytic integration,' Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Vol.12, No.1(1991), pp.3-23 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1201_1
  75. Nagasundaram, M. and A.R. Dennis, 'When a group is not a group : The cognitive foundation of group idea generation,' Small Group Research, Vol.24, No.4(1993), pp.463-489 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496493244003
  76. Nature, 'Editorial comment: Is this the bionic man?' Vol.442(2006), p.109
  77. Nideffer, R.M., 'Test of attentional and interpersonal style,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.34(1976), pp.394-404 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.394
  78. Nonaka, I., 'The knowledge-creating company,' Harvard Business Review, No.(November-Decemebr 1991), pp.96-104
  79. Nunamaker, J.F., A.R. Dennis, J.S. Valacich, D.R. Vogel, and J.F. George, 'Electronic meeting systems to support group work,' Communications of the ACM, Vol.34, No. 7(1991), pp.40-61 https://doi.org/10.1145/105783.105793
  80. Oka, S., Y. Takefuji, and W. Huang, 'The third eye approach to innovate designs and applications into the 21st century: human recognition system by nonlinear oscillations,' Artificial Intelligence, Vol.13, No.5(2000), pp.543-548 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-1976(00)00034-8
  81. Osborn, AF., Applied Imagination, Scribner, New York, 1957
  82. Osborne, J.W., 'Short-and long-tenn memory as a function of individual differences in arousal,' Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol.34(1972), pp.587-593 https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1972.34.2.587
  83. Parks, C.D. and L.J Sanna, Group Performance and Interaction, Westview Press, Colorado, 1999
  84. Paulus, P.B. and M.T. Dzindolet, 'Social influence processes in group brainstorming,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.64, No.4(1993), pp.575-586 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.575
  85. Paulus, P.B., M.T. Dzindolet, G. Poletes, and L.M. Camacho, 'Perception of performance in group brainstorming : The illusion of group productivity,' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol.19, No.1 (1993), pp.78-89 https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293191009
  86. Paulus, P.B., T.S. Larey, and M.T. Dzindolet, 'Creativity in groups and teams,' In Groups at work : Theory and research, M. Turner (ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, 2001, pp.319-338. 2001
  87. Paulus, P.B., T.S. Larey, V.L. Putman, K.L. Leggett, and E.J. Roland, 'Social influence process in computer brainstorming,' Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Vol.18, No.1(1996), pp.3-14 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1801_2
  88. Paulus, P.B., T.S. Larey, and A.H. Ortega, 'Performance and perceptions of brainstormers in an organizational setting,' Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Vol.17, No.1-2(1995), pp.249-265 https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.1995.9646143
  89. Petty, R.E. and J.T. Cacioppo, Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986
  90. Pinsonneault, A., H. Barki, R.B. Gallupe, and N. Hoppen, 'Electronic brainstorming : The illusion of productivity,' Information Systems Research, Vol.10, No.2(1999), pp. 110-133 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.2.110
  91. Pinsonneault, A., H. Barki, R.B. Gallupe, and N. Hoppen, 'The illusion of electronic brainstorming productivity : Theoretical and empirical issues,' Information Systems Research, Vol.10, No.4(1999), pp.378-380 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.4.378
  92. Putman, V.L., 'Effects of additional rules and dominance on brainstorming and decision making,' Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Arlington, 2001
  93. Rammsayer, T. and J. Stahl, 'Extraversion-related differences in response organization : evidence from lateralized readiness potentials,' Biological Psychology, Vol.66, No.1 (2004), pp.35-49 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2003.08.003
  94. Riding, R.J. and L. Anstey, 'Verbal-imagery learning style and reading attainment in eight-year-old children,' Journal of Research in Reading, Vol.5, No.1(1982), pp. 57-66 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1982.tb00129.x
  95. Riding, R.J. and D.G. McQuaid, 'Characteristics of failing readers at 16+,' British Educational Research Journal, Vol.13, No. 1(1987), pp.51-58 https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192870130105
  96. Robbins, S.P., The Truth About Managing People, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 2003
  97. Rosen, V.M. and R.W. Engle, 'The role of working memory capacity in retrieval,' Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, Vol.126, No.3(1997), pp.211-227 https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.3.211
  98. Roy, M.C., S. Gauvin, and M. Limayem, 'Electronic group brainstorming the role of feedback on productivity,' Small Group Research, Vol.27, No.2(1996), pp.215-247 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496496272002
  99. Satzinger, J.W., M.J. Garfield, and M. Nagasundaram, 'The creative process : The effects of group memory on individual idea generation,' Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.15, No.4(1999), pp.143-160 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518225
  100. Savage R.D. and J.F. Savage, 'A longitudinal investigation of personality characteristics and scholastic attainment in junior school children,' Durham Research Review, Vol.30(1973), pp.742-747
  101. Schneider, C., J.S. Valacich, and J.H. Jung, 'Osborne Revisited: Is There no Such Thing as a Bad Idea? The Effects of Electronic Junk on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation Performance,' European Conference on Information Systems, 2008
  102. Schultz, R.L. and E.M. Sullivan, 'Developments in Simulation in Social and Administrative Science,' In Simulation in Social and Administrative Science : Overviews and Case-Examples, H. Guetzkow, P. Kotler, and R.L. Schultz (eds.). Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1972, pp.3-47
  103. Shaw, M.E., Group Dynamics : The Psychology of Small Group Behavior, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981
  104. Slater, P.E., 'Contrasting Correlates of Group Size,' Sociometry, Vol.21(1958), pp. 129-139 https://doi.org/10.2307/2785897
  105. Smith, B.D. and H.J. Vetter, Theoretical Approaches to Personality, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1982
  106. Sosik, J.J., B.J. Avolio, and S.S. Kahai, 'Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment,' Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.82, No.1(1997), pp.89-103 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.89
  107. Speier, C., J.S. Valacich, and I. Vessey, 'The influence of task interruption on individual decision making : An information overload perspective,' Decision Sciences, Vol.30, No.2(1999). pp.337-360 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01613.x
  108. Sternberg, R.J., The Nature of Cognition, MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1999
  109. Straus, S.G., 'Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups,' Small Group Research, Vol. 27, No.1 (1996), pp.115-142 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496496271006
  110. Stroebe, W. and M. Diehl, 'Why groups are less effective than their members : On productivity losses in idea-generating groups,' In European review of social psychology, W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (eds.). Wiley, London, 1994, pp.271-303
  111. Suppes, P., B. Han, and Z. Lu, 'Brain-wave recognition of sentences,' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A., Vol.95(1998), pp.15861-15866 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.26.15861
  112. Szymanski, K. and S.G. Harkins, 'Social loafing and self-evaluation with a social standard,' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.53, No.5(1987), pp.891-897 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.5.891
  113. Todd, J.J. and R. Marois, 'Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex,' Nature, Vol.428 (2004), pp.751-754 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02466
  114. Topi, H., J.S. Valacich, and M.T. Rao, 'The effects of personality and media differences on the performance of dyads addressing a cognitive conflict task,' Small Group Research, Vol.33, No.6(2002), pp.667-701 https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496402238620
  115. Tziner, A. and D. Eden, 'Effects of crew composition on crew performance : Does the whole equal the sum of its parts?' Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.70, No.1 (1985), pp.85-93 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.85
  116. Valacich, J.S., AR Dennis, and T. Connolly, 'Idea generation in computer-based groups : A new ending to an old story,' Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.57(1994), pp.448-467 https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1024
  117. Valacich, J.S., J.H. Jung., and C.A. Looney, 'The effects of individual cognitive ability and idea stimulation on individual idea generation performance,' Group Dynamics : Theory, Research, and Practice, Vol.10, No. 1(2006), pp.1-15 https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.10.1.1
  118. Van de Ven, A. and A.L. Delbecq, 'Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision-making effectiveness,' Academy of Management Journal, Vol.14(1971), pp.203-212 https://doi.org/10.2307/255307
  119. Van de Ven, A. and A.L. Delbecq, 'The effectiveness of nominal, Delphi, and interacting group decision making processes,' Academy of Management Journal, Vol.17(1974), pp.605-621 https://doi.org/10.2307/255641
  120. VanGundy, A.B., Idea Power: Techniques and Resources to Unleash the Creativity in Your Organization, AMACOM, New York, 1992
  121. Vogel, E.K. and M.G. Machizawa, 'Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity,' Nature, Vol.428(2004) pp.748-751 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02447
  122. Walker, E.L. and R. Tarte, 'Memory storage as a function of arousal and time with homogeneous and heterogeneous lists,' Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol.2(1963), pp.113-119 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80075-4
  123. Woodman, R.W., J.E. Sawyer, and R.W. Griffin, 'Toward a theory of organizational creativity,' Academy of Management Review, Vol.18(1993), pp.293-321