보건행정학회지 (Health Policy and Management)

  • 제19권3호
  • /
  • Pages.45-70
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1225-4266(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0149(eISSN)
한국보건행정학회 (Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

건강 위험 인식 연구 : 보건학 연구를 위한 함의

The Study of Health-Risk Perception: Implications for Health Services Research

  • 발행 : 2009.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Outbreaks of health risks such as the Influenza A virus (H1N1) are continuing, which highlights the immediacy of risk control strategies to reduce public's fear and protect the safety of the society. Evidence suggests that success for risk management is basically dependent on the public's willingness to adopt health behaviors recommended by experts, and the behavioral intention relies on their risk perception. Understanding of how individuals think of and feel about health risks is thereby important. This article aims to provide insights for future study on health-risk perception. The main streams and recent developments of theorizing and research on health risk perception are reviewed. The issues, such as (1) health risk perception is an important component for shaping relevant health policies as it reflects public trust of the institutions managing health risks, (2) despite this significance, however, few attempts have been made to address the meaning of 'perceiving health risks' in health services research, are shed light on. On the basis on the critical discussion of the contributions and the limitations of the literature, this article finishes with a few of research agendas by three levels of analysis in risk perception research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김영욱. 위험, 위기 그리고 커뮤니케이션. 서울:이화여자대학교 출판부;2008. 쪽 5-13
  2. 김원제. 한국사회 위험(Risk)의 특성과 치유. 사회연구 2003;1:169-196
  3. 박희제. 위험 인식의 다면성과 위험갈등-위험인식에 대한 사회과학적 이해가 위험정보소통 체계에 주는 함의. 한국환경사회학회 2004;6:8-40
  4. 서문기. 한국사회의 리스크추구성향에 대한 분석. 행정정책 연구 2007;16(3):157-185
  5. 송해룡. 위험보도와 매스커뮤니케이션. 서울:커뮤니케이션북스;2005
  6. 송해룡, 김원제. 위험커뮤니케이션과 위험 수용. 서울:커뮤니케이션북스;2005
  7. 임형준, 권호장, 하미나, 이상규, 황승식, 하은희 등. 황사에 대한 수도권 거주 성인의 위해도 인식 조사. 예방의학회지 2006;39(3):205-212
  8. 조병희. 섹슈얼리티와 위험 연구. 서울:나남;2008
  9. Angeles PA. The harper collins dictionary of philosophy. 2nd ed. New York:HarperCollins Publishers;1992
  10. Aronson E. The rationalizing animal. In : Staw BM,editor. Psychological Dimensions of organizational behavior. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice Hall;1995
  11. Arrow KJ. Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System. J Bus 1986;59(4):385-399 https://doi.org/10.1086/296376
  12. Bauer RA. Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking. In : Cox DF, editor. Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior. Boston:Harvard University; 1967. pp. 389-398
  13. Beecher N, Harrison E, Goldstein N, McDaniel M, Field P, Susskind L. Risk perception, Risk communication, and Stakeholder Involvement for Biosolids Management and Research. J Environ Qual 2005;34:122-128
  14. Bloom JR, Stewart SL, Chang S, You M. Effects of a telephone counseling intervention on sisters of young women with breast cancer. Prev Med 2006;43:379-384 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.07.002
  15. Bomlitz LJ, Brezis M. Misrepresentation of health risks by mass media. J Public Health 2008;30(2):202-204 https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdn009
  16. Bradbury JA. The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of Risk. Sci, Technol Hum Val 1989;14(4):380-399 https://doi.org/10.1177/016224398901400404
  17. Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, McCaul KD, Weinstein ND. Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination. Health Psychol 2007;26(2):136-145 https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136
  18. Brun W. Risk perception: Main issues, approached and findings. In : Wright G, Ayton P,editors. Subjective probability. Chichester:John Wiley and Sons;1994. pp. 395-420
  19. Burns WJ, Slovic P. The diffusion of fear: Modeling community response to a terrorist strike. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation 2007;4(4):1-20
  20. Clarke L, Short Jr. Social organization and risk: some current controversies. Annu Rev Sociol 1993;19:375-399 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.19.080193.002111
  21. Dake K. Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. J Cross Cult Psychol 1991;22:61 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022191221006
  22. Dake K. A cognitive portrayal of risk perception in Turkey: some cross-national comparisons. Risk Management 1993;5(4):25-35 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240162
  23. DeJoy DM. The optimism bias and traffic accident risk perception. Accid Anal Prev 1989;21(4):333-340 https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(89)90024-9
  24. Douglas M. Natural symbols: explorations in cosmology. New York:Pantheon Books;1970
  25. Douglas M. Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. New York:Routledge;1992
  26. Douglas M, Wildavsky AB. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley:University of California Press;1982. 김귀남, 김명곤(옮김). 환경위험과 문화. 서울:명보문화사;1993
  27. Dowling GR, Staelin R. A model of perceived-risk and risk-handling activity. J Consum Res 1994;21:119-134 https://doi.org/10.1086/209386
  28. Dietz T, Stern PC, Guagnano G. Social structural and social-psychological determinants of environmental concern. Environ Behav 1998;30:450-471 https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000402
  29. Dionne G, Fluet C, Desjardins D. Predicted risk perception and risk-taking behavior: The case of impaired driving. J Risk Uncertain 2007;35:237-264 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-007-9023-8
  30. Dixon M, Oyebode F, Uncertainty and risk assessment, Adv Psychiatr Treat 2007;13:70-78 https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.105.002022
  31. Earle, TC. Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society. Westport:Praeger;1995
  32. Facione NC. Perceived risk of breast cancer: influence of heuristic thinking. Cancer Pract 2002;16(2):103-118
  33. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci 1978;8:127-152 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739
  34. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S. Lay foibles and expert fables in judgments about risk. Am Statistician 1981;36:240-255 https://doi.org/10.2307/2683835
  35. Fischhoff B, Bruine de Bruin W. Fifty/fifty=50%? J Behav Decis Making 1999;12:149-163 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2<149::AID-BDM314>3.0.CO;2-J
  36. Fuglenes D, Oian P, Kristiansen IS. Obstetricians' choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200(1):48.e1-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.021
  37. Ganzach Y, Ellis S, Pazy A, Ricci-Siag T. On the perception and operationalization of risk perception. Judgm Decis Mak 2008;3:317-324
  38. Giddens A. Risk and responsibility. Modern Law Review 2003;62(1):1-10 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00188
  39. Green CH, Tunstall SM, Fordham MH. The risks from flooding: which risks and whose perception? Disasters 2007;15(3):227-236 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1991.tb00456.x
  40. Greening L, Dollinger SJ, Pitz G. Adolescents' perceived risk and personal experience with natural disasters: an evaluation of cognitive heuristics. Acta Psychol 2007;91(1):27-38 https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(94)00040-9
  41. Grobe, D, Douthitt R. Consumer acceptance of recombinant bovine growth hormone: Interplay between beliefs and perceived risks. J Consum Aff 1995;29:128-143 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1995.tb00042.x
  42. Guillemin JH, Holmstrom HG. Mixed blessings : intensive care for newborns. New York:Oxford University Press;1986
  43. Guyer P. The cambridge companion to Kant. New York:Cambridge University Press;1992
  44. Heimer CA. Social structure, psychology and the estimation of risk. Annu Rev Sociol 1988;14:491-519 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.002423
  45. Heine SJ, Lehman DR. Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more vulnerable than the East? J Pers Soc Psychol 1995;68(4):595-607 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.595
  46. Hinman GW, Eugene AR, Randall RK, Thomas CL, Perceptions of nuclear and other risks in Japan and the United States. Risk Anal 1993;13(4):449-455 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00745.x
  47. Holton GA, Perspectives: Defining risk. Financial Analysts Journal 2004;60(6):19-25 https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v60.n6.2669
  48. Hopwood P. Breast cancer risk perception: what do we know and understand? Breast Cancer Res 2000;2(6):387-391 https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr83
  49. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: A decade later. Health Educ Quart 1984;11(1):1-47 https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818401100101
  50. Johnson JG, Cohen P, Kotler L, Kasen S, Brook JS. Psychiatric disorders associated with risk for the development of eating disorders during adolescence and early adulthood. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002;70(5):1119-1128 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.70.5.1119
  51. Katapodi MC, Lee KA, Facione NC, Dodd MJ. Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: A meta-analytic review. Prev Med 2004;38:388-402 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.012
  52. Knight FH. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Chicago:University of Chicago Press;1921.pp.26
  53. Kogan N, Wallach MA. Risk taking: A study in cognition and personality. New York:Holt, Rinehard and Winston;1964
  54. Krimsky S, Golding D. Social theories of risk. Westport:Praeger;1992
  55. Mayo DG, Hollander RD. Acceptable evidence: science and values in risk management. New York:Oxford University Press;1994
  56. Lacey A. Dictionary of Philosophy. London:Routledge;1999
  57. Lee TR. The public's perception of risk and the question of irrationality. Proc R Soc Lond 1981:5-16
  58. Leppin A, Aro AR. Risk perceptions related to SARS and Avian Influenza: Theoretical foundations of current empirical research. Int J Behav Med 2009;16:7-29 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-008-9002-8
  59. Lin Y, Raghubir P. Gender Differences in unrealistic optimism about marriage and divorce: are men more optimistic and women more realistic? Pers Soc Psychol B 2005;31(2):198-207 https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271325
  60. Lupton D. Risk. New York:Routledge;1999
  61. Martin W, Lobchuk M. Breast cancer risk perception and surveillance: an integrative review. Online J Knowl Synth Nurs 2003;28(10):2
  62. Masuda JR, Garvin T. Place, culture, and the social amplification of risk. Risk Anal 2006;26(2);437-454 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00749.x
  63. Mayo DG, Hollander RD. Acceptable evidence: science and values in risk management. New York:Oxford University Press;1994
  64. McKenna FP. It won't happen to me: unrealistic optimism or illusion of control? British J Psychol 1993;84:39-50 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1993.tb02461.x
  65. Mills B, Reyna VF, Estrada S. Explaining contradictory relations between risk perception and risk taking. Psychol Sci 2008;19(5):429-433 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02104.x
  66. Nelkin D. Communicating technological risk: The social construction of risk perception. Annu Rev Publ Health 1989;10:95-113 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.10.050189.000523
  67. Palmer CGS, Sainfort F. Toward a new conceptualization and operationalization of risk perception within the genetic counseling domain. J Genet Couns 2005;2(4):275-294 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00961576
  68. Pidgeon NF, Kasperson RE, Slovic P. The social amplification of risk. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press;2003
  69. Plough A, Krimsky S. The emergence of risk communication studies: social and political context. Sci, Technol Hum Val 1987;12(3/4):4-10
  70. Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF. Trust in risk regulation: cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? Risk Anal 2005;25(1):197-207 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00579.x
  71. Prohaska TR, Albrecht G, Levy JA, Sugrue N, Kim JH. Determinants of self-perceived risk for AIDS. J Health Soc Behav 1995;31(4):384-394 https://doi.org/10.2307/2136821
  72. Rayner S. Management of radiation hazards in hospitals: plural rationalities in a single institution. Soc Stud Sci 1986;16(4):573-591 https://doi.org/10.1177/030631286016004002
  73. Reid SG. Perception and communication of risk, and the importance of dependability. Struct Saf 1999;21(4):373-384 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(99)00031-4
  74. Renn O. Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges. J Risk Res 1998;1(1):49-71 https://doi.org/10.1080/136698798377321
  75. Renn O. Risk perception and communication: lessons for the food and food packaging industry. Food Addit Contam 2005;22(10):1061-1071 https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030500227792
  76. Renn O, Rohrmann B. Cross-cultural risk perception research. Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic;2000
  77. Reynolds WW, Nelson RM. Risk perception and decision processes underlying informed consent to research participation. Soc Sci Med 2007;65(10):2105-2115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.021
  78. Rippl S. Cultural theory and risk perception: a proposal for a better measurement. J Risk Res 2002;5(2):147-156 https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870110042598
  79. Schapira MM, Davids SL, McAuliffe TL, Nattinger AB. Agreement between scales in the measurement of breast cancer risk perceptions. Risk Anal 2004;24(3):665-673 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00466.x
  80. Scheufele DA, Corley EA, Dunwoody S, Shih TJ, Hillback E, Guston DH. Scientists worry about some risks more than the public. Nat Nanotechnol 2007;2(12):732-734 https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2007.392
  81. Skjong R. Etymology of risk: classical greek origin. Available from : URL : http://research.dnv.com/skj/Papers/ETYMOLOGY-OF-RISK.pdf
  82. Sjoberg L. Factors in risk perception. Risk Anal 2000;20(1):1-11 https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00001
  83. Sjoberg L. The Methodology of Risk Perception Research. Qual Quant 2000;34(4):407-418 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004838806793
  84. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987;236:280–285 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
  85. Slovic P. The Perception of risk. London:Earthscan Publications;2000
  86. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Perceived risk: psychological factors and social implications. In : Warner F, Slater DH,editors. The assessment and perception of risk. London:The Royal Society;1981
  87. Slovic P, Flynn JH, Layman M. Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science 1991;254:1603-1607 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.254.5038.1603
  88. Sofsky W. Das Prinzip Sicherheit. Fischer : 2005. 이한우(옮김). 안전의 원칙: 위험사회, 자유냐 안전이냐. 경기:푸른숲;2007
  89. Starr C. Social benefit versus technological risk. Science 1969;165:1232-1238 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.165.3899.1232
  90. Steele J, Gardner J. Risks and legal theory. Oxford:Hart Publishing;2004
  91. Tansey J, O'riordin T. Cultural theory and risk: a review. Health Risk Soc 1999;1(1): 71-90 https://doi.org/10.1080/13698579908407008
  92. Tellegen E, Wolsink M. Society and its environment : an introduction. London:Routledge;1998
  93. Thomson ME, Onkal D, Guvenc G. A cognitive portrayal of risk perception in Turkey: some cross-national comparisons. Risk Management 2003;5(4):25-35 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240162
  94. Tolman, EC. Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York:Century;1932
  95. Trumbo CM. Heuristic-systematic information processing and risk judgment. Risk Anal 1999;19:391-400 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00415.x
  96. Trumbo CW, McComas KA, Besley JC. Individual- and community-level effects on risk perception in cancer cluster investigations. Risk Anal 2008;28(1):161-78 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01007.x
  97. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974;85:1124-1131 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
  98. Van Nuffelen D. The social construction of the risk. Scientific Bulletin Federal Agency for Nuclear Control;2004. Available from : URL : http://afcn.fgov.be/CWS/GED/pop_View.aspx?LG=1&ID=950
  99. Vernon SW. Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999;25:101-119
  100. Viscusi K. Age variations in risk perceptions and smoking decisions. Rev Econ Stat 1991;73(4):577-88 https://doi.org/10.2307/2109396
  101. Walker EA, Caban A, Schechter CB, Basch CE, Blanco E, DeWitt T, et al. Measuring comparative risk perceptions in an urban minority population: the risk perception survey for diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2007;33:103-110 https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721706298198
  102. Weber EU, Hsee CK. Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Manage Sci 1998;44(9):1205-1217 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205
  103. Weber EU, Hsee CK. Models and mosaics: investing cross-cultural differences in risk perception and risk preference. Psychon Bull Rev 1999;6(4):611-617 https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212969
  104. Webster P, Austoker J. Women's knowledge about breast cancer risk and their views of the purpose and implications of breast screening-a questionnaire survey. J Public Health 2006;28(3):197-202 https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdl030
  105. Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980;39:806-820 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806
  106. Weinstein ND. Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science 1989;246:1232-1233 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2686031
  107. Weinstein ND, Kwitel A, McCaul KD, Magnan RE, Gerrard M, Gibbons FX. Risk perceptions: assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination. Health Psychol 2007;26(2):146-151 https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.146
  108. You M. Determinants of risk perception of breast cancer [dissertation]. Berkeley:University of California, Berkeley;2008
  109. Zinn JO. Literature review: sociology and risk. Canterbury, Social Contexts and Responses to Risk Network (SCARR). Available at: http://www.kent.ac.uk/scarr/papers/Sociology%20Literature%20Review%20 WP1.04%20Zinn.pdf
  110. Zinn JO. Recent developments in sociology of risk and uncertainty. Historical Social Research 2006;31(2):275-286

피인용 문헌

  1. Public health concerns and risk perceptions in Korea: Focusing on the residents of the metropolitan cities vol.57, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2014.57.3.259
  2. Perceptions of Healthcare Workers of Health Risks of Electromagnetic Fields vol.15, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15384/kjhp.2015.15.2.39