Photodynamic Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Using Various Photosensitizer

  • Kwon, Pil-Seung (Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Wonkwang Health Science College) ;
  • Jo, Yoon-Kyung (Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Dongnam Health College)
  • ;
  • 조윤경 (동남보건대학 임상병리과)
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the photodynamic effect of various photosensitizing agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). MRSA was exposed to light from a 632 urn diode laser (15 J/$cm^2$) in the presence of various photosensitizer, such as photofrin, photogem, radachlorine and ALA. In vivo study was performed using ICR mice. Twenty eight mice had a standard wound ($100\;mm^2$) created on the dorsum, and MRSA was inoculated into the wound region. The four groups were classified as follows: (1) the untreated control group (bacteria alone), (2) the bacteria plus light group (15 J/$cm^2$), (3) the bacteria plus photofrin group (kept in the dark), and (4) the photodynamic therapy (PDT) group (bacteria, photofrin, and light). After photofrin (dose 1 mg/kg) injection, the experimental group was irradiated with 632 urn diode laser (15 J/$cm^2$) for 30 minutes after In vitro results of PDT showed the complete killing of MRSA at the photofrin, radachlorine, and photogem However, ALA-PDT was ineffective on MRSA viability. In vivo results showed that photofrin has therapeutic effect on the wound infection. These results demonstrate that selective lethal photosensitization of MRSA can be achieved using phofrin, photogem and radachlorin. Thus, PDT can inactivate MRSA survival.

Keywords

References

  1. Barr H, Tralau CJ, Macrobert AJ, Krasner N, Boulos PB, Clark CG, Bown SG. Photodynamic therapy in the normal rat colon with phthalocyanine sensitisation. Br J Cancer 1987. 56: 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1987.166
  2. Bedwell J, Holton J, Varia D, Macrobert AJ, Bownn SG. In vitro killing of helicobacter pylori with photodynamic therapy. Lancet 1990. 335: 1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(90)91361-D
  3. Chambers HF. Methicillin resistance in Staphylococci: Molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev ET. 1997. 10: 781-791.
  4. Chang S, Sievert DM, Hageman JC, Boulton ML, Tenover FC, Downes FP, Shah S, Rudrik JT, Pupp GR, Brown WJ, Cardo D, Fridkin SK. Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene. N Engl J Med. 2003. 348: 1342-1347. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa025025
  5. Dougherty T, Kaufman J, Goldfarb A, Weishaupt K, Boyle D. Photoradiation therapy for the treatment of malignant tumors. Cancer Res. 1978. 38: 143-151.
  6. Foote CS. Type I and Type II mechanism of photodynamic action, in heitz JR and Dow-num KR (eds), Light-activates Pesticides. American Chemical Society, Washinton DC. 2. 1987. 2-38.
  7. Georgopapadakou NH, Smith SA, Bonner DP. Penicillin binding proteins in a Staphylococcus aureus strains resistant to specific beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999. 43: 15-22.
  8. Golding PS, King TA, Maddocks L, Drucker DB, Blinkhorn AS. Photosensitization of Staphylococcus aureus with malachite green isothiocyanate: inactivation efficiency and spectroscopic analysis. J Photochem Photobial B. 1998. 47: 202-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1011-1344(98)00224-3
  9. Gorbach SL. Bismuth therapy in gastrointestinal disease. Gastroenterology 1990. 99: 863-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(90)90983-8
  10. Hamblin MR, Hasan T. Photodynamic theraphy: a new antimicrobial approach to infectious disease-. J Photochem Photobial B. 2004. 3: 436-450. https://doi.org/10.1039/b311900a
  11. Hong SG, Lee JW, Yong DE, Kim EC, Jeong SH, Park YJ, Kim MN, Au Y, Shin JH, Lee JU, Ahn JY, Lee SH, Kim JS, Shin HB. Antimicrobial resistance of clinically important bacteria isolated from 12 hospitals in Korea. Korean J Clin Microbiol. 2004. 7: 171-177.
  12. Jori G. Tumour photosensitizer: approaches to enhance the selectivity and efficienty of photodynamic therapy. J Photochem Photobial B. 1996. 36: 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1011-1344(96)07352-6
  13. Kennedy JC, Pottier RH. Endogenous protoporphyrin X, a clinical usefull photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1992. 14: 275-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(92)85108-7
  14. Kessel D, Thompson P, Saaito K, Namturri KD. Tumof localization and photosensitization by sulfonated dervatives of tetraphenylporphine. Photochem Photobial. 1987. 45: 787-790. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1987.tb07883.x
  15. Kim JS, Kim HS, Song WK, Cho HC, Lee KM, Kim EC. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolated in 13 Korean hospitals. Korean J Lab Med. 2004. 24: 223-229.
  16. Kubin A, Wierrani F, Jindra RH, Loew HG, Grünberger W, Ebermann R, Alth G. Antagonistic effects of combination photosensitization by hypericin, meso-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) and photofrin II on Staphylococcus aureus. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1999. 25: 13-21.
  17. Kwak SY, Bae SM, Lee AJ, Kim JK, Park CH, Han SJ. Uptake and photodynamic therapy effects of radachlorin in vitro and in vivo. J Kor Photodynamic Association. 2005. 2: 123-130.
  18. Lee HM, Yong DE, Lee KW, Hong SG, Kim EC, Jeong SH, Park YJ, Choi TY, Au Y, Shin JH, Lee YG, Lee JU, Ahn JY, Lee SH, U GJ. Antimicrobial resistance of clinically important bacteria isolated from 12 hospitals in Korea in 2004. Korean J Clin Microbiol. 2005. 8: 66-73.
  19. Maisch T. Anti-microbial photodynamic therapy: useful in the future. Laser Med Sci. 2007. 22: 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-006-0409-7
  20. Neugen M, Pettyjohn R, Sahm DF. Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (NARSA). http://www.narsa.net/ (Updated on Jul 2008).
  21. Ochsner M. New trends in photo biology of photophysical and photobiological processes in the photodynamic therapy of tumors. Photochem Photobiol. 1997. 39: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1984.tb03395.x
  22. Oleinick NL, Evans HH. The photo biology of photodynamic therapy: cellular targets and mechanism. Rad Res. 1998. 150: 146-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/3579816
  23. Rimington C. Photophyrin and haem biosynthesis and its control. Acta Med Scand. 1996. 445 (suppl): 11s-24s.
  24. Tolstykh PI, Stranadko EF, Koraboev UM, Urinov AIa, Tolstykh MP, Terekhova RP, Volkova NN, Duvanskiĭ VA. Experimental study of photodynamic effect on bacterial wound microflora. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol. 2001. 2: 85-87.
  25. Tomio L, Redi G, Joli PL, Zorat GB. Hematoporphyrin as a sensitizer in tumor photo therapy: effect of medium polarity on the photo sensitizing efficiency and role of the adminstration pathway on the distribution in normal and tumor bearing rats, in R. Pratesi and CA sacchi (eds), Lasers in photoedicine and photobiology, pringer-Verlag, Berlin. 1980. 76-82.
  26. Wainwright M, Phoenix DA, Laycock SL, Wareing DR, Wright PA. Photobactericidal activity of phenothiazinium dyes against methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998. 15: 177-181.