Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters (한국미생물·생명공학회지)

The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology (한국미생물·생명공학회)
권호 표지

An Investigation on the Anitibiotic Resistant Condition and Label-Stated of Domestically Distributed Livestock-Environment Improving Agents

국내에서 유통 중인 축산환경개선제의 표기사항 및 항생제 내성 현황조사

  • Choi, Jung-Eun (Department of Environmental Engineering University of Suwon) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Young (Department of Environmental Engineering University of Suwon)
  • Published : 2009.09.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A study on livestock environment improving agents was conducted; top two brands (A and B) in the market, bottom two brands (E and F) based on market shares and two newly developed agents (C and D) were measured for viable count and tested for resistance towards antibiotics prohibited against livestock feeds. Test results revealed that the measured viable count of agents A and B matched those on the labels were identical; however agent E lacked information on viable counts nor the intended usage, while the measured viable count of agent F was less than the label-stated count. No correlation was found between the antibiotic-resistance test and market share, and most of the agents excluding B were found to display resistance case of Lincosimides such as Lincomycine and Clindmycin, resistant bacteria were found, with the except of agent B. Amoxicillin, Ampicillin and Penillin (type-Penecillins) and Erythromycin (type-Macrolide) were shown to contain resistant bacteria, with the except of agents Band E; the same for Norploxacin (type-Quinoline) and Neomycin antibiotics. Aminoglycosides such as Gentamycin and Streptomycin contained resistant bacteria, excluding agent B. Oxytetracyclin (type-Tetracycline), which is banned for use as resistant bacteria showed the highest sensitivity among the 12 antibiotics, revealed positive results in the test for resistant bacteria; again excluding of agents Band E. These results reveal that many agents contained resistant bacteria despite the fact that they were prohibited; this calls for a more accurate display of the facts and specifications, systematic distributions and strict verification processes of environment improving agents.

축산환경개선용 미생물 제품 중 시장점유율을 기준으로 상위제품 A, B,하위 제품 E, F와 현재 개발완료 되어진 C, D를 선정하여 생균수 측정과, 사료첨가용으로 사용이 금지된 항생제에 대한 내성 테스트를 실시하였다. 생균수 측정 결과 상위 점유율의 A, B사 제품은 표기상의 생균수와 일치하였으나, 하위 점유율을 차지하고 있는 E제품의 경우 함유균주나 효능에 대한 정보를 제공하고 않고 있을뿐더러 F사의 제품은 균수가 적게 측정되어 실제 표기사항과 일치하지 않았다. 항생제 내성실험결과 점유율에 따른 상관관계는 없었으나, B사를 제외한 제품의 대부분에서 내성균이 존재함을 확인하였다. Lincosimides 계열의 Lincomycicne과 Clindamycin의 경우 B사를 제외한 제품에서 내성균이 존재하였다. Penicillins 계열의 Amoxicillin, Ampicillin, Penicillin 및 Macrolide 계열의 Erythromycin 항생제는 B사와 E를 제외한 제품에서 내성균이 존재함을 확인하였다. Quinoline계열 Norploxacin 또한 B사와 E사를 제외한 제품에서 내성균을 보였으며 Neomycin의 항생제 또한 유사한 내성분포 결과를 나타내었다. Neomycin과 같은 Aminiglycosides계열의 Gentamycin, Streptomycin은 B사제품을 제외한 제품에서 내성을 나타내었다. 마지막으로 내성-균으로 사용 금지된 Tetracycline계열의 Oxytetracyclin은 12가지 항생제중 가장 높은 비율의 감수성을 나타내었으나 B, E사를 제외한 제품에서 내성균의 존재를 확인하였다. 실험결과 사용 금지된 항생제 품목임에도 불구하고 많은 제품에서 때 성균이 존재하였으며, 이에 따라 환경개선제 특성의 정확한 표기와 체계적인 유통 체계와 검증 과정이 필요하다고 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Animal biotechnology division. 2002. Statistics Data Base for Livestock Research. National Livestock Research Institute
  2. Coconnier, M. H., M. -F. Bernet, G. Chauviere and A. L. Servin. 1993a. Adhering heat-killed human Lactobacillus acidophillus strain LB, inhibits the process of pathogenicity of diarrhoeagenic bacteria in cultured human intestinal cells, J. Diarrhoeal Dis. Res. 11: 235-242
  3. Coconnier, M. H., M.-F. Bemet, S. Kerneis, G. Chauviere, J. Fournait and A. L. Servin. 1993b. Inhibition of adhesion of enteroinvasive pathogens to human intestinal Caco-2 cells by Lactobacillus acidophillus strain LB decreases bacterial invasion. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 110: 299-306 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb06339.x
  4. Hussain, Z., L. Stoakes, S. Garrow, S. Longo, V. Fitzgerald, and R. Lannigan. 2000. Rapid detection of mecA-positive and mecA-negative, coagulase-negative staphylococci by an anti-penicillin binding protein 2a slide latex agglutination test. J. Clin. Microbial. 38: 2051-2054
  5. Jang, H. D., H. J. Kim, J. H. Cho, Y. G. Chen, J. S. Yoo, and I. H. Kim. 2007. Effects of Dietary Probiotic Complex on Growth Performance, Blood Immunological Parameters and Fecal Malodor Gas Emission in Growing Pigs. Kor. J. Ani. Sci. & Technol. 49: 501-508 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2007.49.4.501
  6. Jung, S. C., National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service and Korea Food & Drug Administration. 2006. Establishment of control system of antibiotics for livestocks. 8-12
  7. Jung, Y. H., Korea Consumer Agency and Korea Food & Drug Administration. 2007. A study on antibiotic resistance and effect assessment in domestic livestock environment, 12-13
  8. Kangwon university and Rural Development Adiministration. 2009. Development of synbiotics and evaluation method for monogastric animals
  9. Kim, D. H. and C. S. Jung. 2003. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Fermented Microbial Complex (Eco-Farm) on Performance of Finishing Pigs and Air Quality in Finishing Building. J. Lives. Hous. & Env. 9: 27-34
  10. Kim, J. H., C. -H. Kim, and Y. D. Ko. 2001. Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Fermented Feed (Bio-$\alpha$) on Performance of Finishing Pigs and Fe. Kor. J. Ani. Sci. & Technol. 43: 193-197
  11. Kim, Y. H., Korea consumer affairs institue, Korea Food & Drug Administration. 2007. Survey of antimicrobial resistance, and public campaign
  12. Kwon, Y. I., T. W. Kim, H. Y. Kim, Y. H. Chang, H. S. Kwak, G. J. Woo, and Y. H. Chung. 2007. Monitoring of Antimicrobial Resistant Bacteria from Animal Farm Environments in Korea, Kor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35: 17-25
  13. Lee, E. Y. 2008. Problems and Verification System of Probiotics as Livestock-environment Improving Agent Produced and Circulated, Kor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 36: 87-95
  14. National Committee for clinical laboratory standards. 2001. perfomance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, 7th ed. approved standard MA7. National committee for clinical laboratory standards
  15. National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service. Vrrulence Chemistry department. 2009. The present situation of the violation of remaining material and of the shipping limit of stock farm products by the farmhouse
  16. Park, Y. H. 2007. Risk Management of Critically Important Veterinary Antibiotics, Seoul university and Korea Food & Drug Administration
  17. Reischl, U., H. J. Linde, M. Metz, B. Leppmeie, and N. Lehn. 2000. Rapid identification of methillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and simultaneous species confirmation using real-time fluorescence PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol 38: 2429-2433
  18. Sin, H. C. 2006. Veterinary drug residue monitoring, konkuk university and Korea Food & Drug Administration
  19. Wachholz, D. E. and C. J. Heidenriech. 1970. Effect of tylosine on swine growth in two environments. J. Anim. Sci. 31: 1014
  20. Witte, W. 2000. Selective pressure by antibiotic use in livestock. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 16: S19-S24