Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

A retrospective study of the dental implants placed in the controlled diabetes mellitus patients

조절되는 당뇨환자에게 식립된 치과 임플란트의 생존율에 대한 후향적 연구

  • Kim, Young-Hee (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Um, Yoo-Jung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cho, Kyu-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 김영희 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 엄유정 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 정의원 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 김창성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 조규성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 최성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to analyze 7-year cumulative survival rate (CSR, %) of dental implants in the controlled diabetic patients and to evaluate the influence of the position, diameter and length of fixture, bone quality, age, gender and the method of maxillary sinus elevation on the survival rate. Methods: The data of 342 placed implants in the 104 diabetic patients collected between 1995 and 2007 at the Department of Periodontology in Yonsei University Hospital were analyzed. Results: Seven-year CSR of the 342 dental implants in the 104 controlled diabetic patients was 96.5%. The survival rates of the placed implants according the position have no statistically significant difference. The survival rates according to the length or diameter of the fixtures have no statistically significant difference. The survival rates according to the bone quality were 100% (Type I), 97.1% (Type II), 97.7% (Type III) and 85.7%(Type IV). The difference between the survival rate of Type I, II and III and that of Type IV was statistically significant. The survival rates according to patient gender were 96.8% (male), 95.5% (female). The survival rates according to patient age were 100% (${\leq}59$), 93.8% (${\geq}60$). The survival rates according to the method of sinus elevation in the maxillary posterior area were 96.8% (without sinus elevation), 92.9% (lateral approach) and 89.8% (crestal approach). Conclusions: Dental implants can be used successfully in the controlled diabetic patients. In case of upper posterior region which has poor bone density and older patients, the implant treatment should be more properly planed, executed, and followed-up.

Keywords

References

  1. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Shaw J. Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature 2001;414:782787
  2. Mealey BL, Ocampo GL. Diabetes mellitus and periodontal disease. Periodontology 2000 2007;44:127-153 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00193.x
  3. Mealey BL, Oates TW. Diabetes mellitus and periodontal diseases. J Periodontol 2006;77:1289-1303 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050459
  4. Taylor GW. Bidirectional interrelationships between diabetes and periodontal diseases: An epidemiologic perspective. Ann periodontol 2001;6:99-112 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2001.6.1.99
  5. Olson JW, Shernoff AF, Tarlow JL et al. Dental endosseous implant assessments in a type 2 diabetic population:A prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 2000;15:811-818
  6. Peled M, Ardekian L, Tagger-Green N, Gutmacher Z, Machtei EE. Dental implants in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A clinical study. Implant Dent 2003;12:116-122 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ID.0000058307.79029.B1
  7. Fiorellini JP, Chen PK, Nevins M, Nevins ML A retrospective study of dental implants in diabetic patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:366-373
  8. Farzad P, Andersson L, Nyberg J. Dental implant treatment in diabetic patients. Implant Dent 2002;11:262-267 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200207000-00011
  9. Blanchaert RH. Implants in the medically challenged patient. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:35-45
  10. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ. Dental implants in the diabetic patient: a retrospective study. Implant Dent 1999;8:355-359 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199904000-00005
  11. Morris HF, Ochi S, Winkler S. Implant survival in patients with type 2 diabetes: placement to 36 months. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:157-165 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.157
  12. Dent CD, Olson JW, Farish SE et al. The influence of preoperative antibiotics on success of endosseous implants up to and including stage II surgery: a study of 2,641 implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:19-24
  13. Sbordone L, Barone A, Ramaglia L, Ciaglia RN, Iacono VJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility of periodontopathic bacteria associated with failing implants. J Periodontol 1995;66:69-74 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1995.66.1.69
  14. Lekholm U, Zarb GA, Branemark PI. Tissue integrated prostheses Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago. Quintenssence 1985;199-209
  15. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP et al. Long-term evaluation of prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  16. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Burugenakte C et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and etched (SLA) surface : early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-153 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  17. Smith RA, Berger R, Dodson TB. Risk factors associated with dental implants in healthy and medically compromised patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:367-372
  18. Friberg B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U, Branemark PI. Longterm follow-up of severly atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Branemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res 2000;2:184-189 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00116.x
  19. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P et al. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: A 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639-645
  20. Bryant SR. The effects of age, jaw site, and bone condition on oral implant outcomes. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:470-490
  21. Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five-year follow-up report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:142-147 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050304.x
  22. Misch CE. Translation of Contemporary Implant Dentistry, 2nd editon. Seoul: Narae Publishing Inc; 1999:205-215
  23. Langer B, Langer L, Herrmann I, Jorneus L. The wide fixture: A solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:400-408
  24. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Johansson C, Rangert B, Lekholm U. Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants: An experimental study in rabbits. Int. J Oral Maillofac Surg 1997;26:141-148
  25. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:173-180
  26. Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Weaver AL, Lohse CM. Early experience with Wide-Platform Mk II implants. Part I: Implant survival. Part II: Evaluation of risk factors involving implant survival. Int Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:208-216
  27. Deporter D, Pilliar RM, Todescan R, Watson P, Pharoah M. Managing the posterior mandible of partially edentulous patients with short, porous-surfaced dental implants: Early data from a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:653-658
  28. Brocard D, Barthet P, Baysse E, et al. A multicenter report on 1,022 consecutively placed ITI implants: a 7-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:691-700
  29. Lazzara R, Siddiqui AA, Binon P et al. Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3i endosseous dental implants placed over a five-year period. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:73-83 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070109.x
  30. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  31. Meijer HJ, Batenburg RH, Raghoebar GM. Influence of patient age on the success rate of dental implants supporting an overdenture in an edentulous mandible: a 3-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:522-526
  32. Bryant SR, Zarb GA. Osseointegration of oral implants in older and younger adults. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:492-499
  33. Engfors I, Ortorp A, Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in elderly patients: A 5-year retrospective study of 133 edentulous patients older than 79 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:190-198 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00035.x
  34. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systemic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003;8:328-343 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328
  35. Yon JY, Chae GJ, Jung UW et al. Long-term evaluation of implant placed in sites grafed by lateral window approach on maxillary sinus; a 10-year retrospective study. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2007;37:691-704
  36. Kim SH, Kim BO, Han KY. A clinical study on the periodontal status of the patient with diabetes mellitus. J Korean Acad Periodontol 1993;23:27-36
  37. Kim MJ, Ryu SH, Park JW, Suh JY, Lee JM. The gingival tissue levels of bone resorptive mediators in human chronic periodontitis with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2007;37:743-753 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2007.37.4.743