Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain

  • 제34권3호
  • /
  • Pages.303-316
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2288-9272(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-8493(eISSN)
대한안면통증구강내과학회 (Korean Academy of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine)
권호 표지

성별에 따른 측두하악장애 환자의 긴장성 두통 양상

Evaluation of Temporomandibular Disorders with Tension-Type Headache by Gender

  • 고석호 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 강수경 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 어규식 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 홍정표 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 전양현 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강내과학교실)
  • Ko, Seok-Ho (Dept. of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kang, Soo-Kyung (Dept. of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Auh, Q-Schick (Dept. of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Hong, Jung-Pyo (Dept. of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Chun, Yang-Hyun (Dept. of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • 발행 : 2009.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 긴장성 두통이 있는 측두하악장애 환자의 성별에 따른 양상을 평가하기 위하여 시행되었다. 경희대학교 치과대학 병원 구강내과에 내원한 환자 중 긴장성 두통을 동반하거나 동반하지 않은 측두하악장애 환자를 대상으로 연구가 시행되었다. 긴장성 두통을 동반한 측두하악장애 환자 60명을 실험군, 긴장성 두통을 동반하지 않는 측두하악장애 환자 111명을 대조군으로 하여 통증의 질과 강도, 양측성 유무 그리고 일상생활에서의 증감 유무 등을 관찰하고 통계 처리하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 긴장성 두통이 없는 측두하악장애 환자에서 통증의 질은 성별 차이가 있었지만(p=0.04), 긴장성 두통이 있는 측두하악장애 환자에서는 성별 차이가 없었다. 2. 긴장성 두통이 없는 측두하악장애 환자에서 통증의 강도는 성별 차이가 없었고, 긴장성 두통이 있는 측두하악장애 환자에서도 성별 차이가 없었다. 3. 긴장성 두통이 없는 측두하악장애 환자에서 통증의 양측성 유무는 성별 차이가 없었고, 긴장성 두통이 있는 측두하악장애 환자에서도 성별 차이는 없었다. 4. 긴장성 두통이 없는 측두하악장애 환자에서 일상생활에 따른 통증의 증가 유무는 성별 차이가 없었고, 긴장성 두통이 있는 측두하악장애 환자에서도 성별 차이가 없었다. 따라서, 긴장성 두통이 없는 측두하악장애 환자의 통증의 질에서는 성별 차이가 있었지만 긴장성 두통이 있는 경우에는 성별 차이가 없었기 때문에 긴장성 두통이 있는 환자를 진료할 때는 남성과 여성이 비슷한 통증의 질을 가지고 있음을 고려해야 한다.

This study was designed to evaluate the Temporomandibular Disorders(TMD) with Tension-Type Headache(TTH) by gender. Patients with TMD and/or TTH visited the Department of Oral Medicine, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital were recruited to this study. Experimental group(n=60) is composed of TMD with TTH and control group(n=111) is composed of TMD without TTH. Evaluation list was pain quality, pain intensity, pain laterality, pain increase by routine physical activity and then it was analyzed statistically. The results were as follows ; 1. In the control group, pain quality was significantly different by gender(p=0.04). But, in the experimental group, pain quality was not significantly different by gender. 2. In the control group, pain intensity was not significantly different by gender. And, in the experimental group, pain intensity was not significantly different by gender. 3. In the control group, pain laterality was not significantly different by gender. And, in the experimental group, pain laterality was not significantly different by gender. 4. In the control group, pain increase by routine physical activity was not significantly different by gender. And, in the experimental group, pain increase by routine physical activity was not significantly different by gender. Therefore, it is considered that not temporomandibular disorder patients with tension-type headache but temporomandibular disorder patients without tension-type headache was influenced by gender in the pain quality.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ad hoc Committee on Classification of Headache. Classification of headache. JAMA 1962;179:717-723 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1962.03050090045008
  2. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgia and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988;8(suppl 7):1-96 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1988.0801001.x
  3. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders. Cephalalgia 2004;24(suppl 1):1-152
  4. Rassmussen BK. Migraine and tension-type headache in a general population : psychosocial factors. Int J Epidemiol 1992;21:1138-1143 https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/21.6.1138
  5. Rassmussen BK, Jensen R, Olesen J. A populationbased analysis of the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society. Cephalagia 1991;11: 129-134 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1991.1103129.x
  6. Philips C. Headache and personality. J Psychosom Res 1976;20:535-542 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(76)90054-4
  7. Olesen J, Tfelt-Hansen P, Welch KMA. The headache. 1st ed. New York, 1993, Raven Press Ltd., pp 479-482
  8. Chun YH, Hong JP. Dental Approach of tension-type headaches. The Journal of Korean Dental Association 2003;41:604-609
  9. Lee HG, Hong JP, Chun YH. Orofacial Evaluation of Tension-type Headache in Dentistry. Kor J Oral Med 2004;29(4):395-406
  10. Auh QS, Hong JP, Chun YH. Clinical Symptom of Tension-type Headache and Temporomandibular Disorders in Pain. Kor J Oral Med 2004;29(4):353-365
  11. Huh KH, Kim JS, Hong JP, Chun YH. Interrelationship of Tension-type Headache and Oral Parafunction. Kor J Oral Med 2005;30(1):79-85
  12. Kim JS, Auh QS, Lee JY, Hong JP, Chun YH. The Effect of the Pain on the TMJ and Masticatory Muscles to Tension-type Headache. Kor J Oral Med 2006;31(4):326-335
  13. Oh BS, Auh QS, Hong JP, Chun YH. Pattern of Pain on Temporomandibular Joint-Muscle Area in Tension-type Headache Patients. Kor J Oral Med 2007;32(1):113-120
  14. Roh JK, Kim JS, Ahn YO. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of migraine and tension-type headache in Korea, Headache 1998;38:356-365 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3805356.x
  15. Okeson JP. Orofacial pain : Guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management. 3rd ed., Chicago, 1996, Quintessence., pp.127-189
  16. Gallai V, Sarchielli P, Carboni F et al. Applicability of the 1988 IHS criteria to headache patients under theage of 18 years attending 21 Italian headache clinics. Headache 1995;35:146-153
  17. Inan LE, Tulunay FC, Guvener A, Tokgoz G, Inan N. Characteristics of headache in migraine without aura and episodic tension-type headache in the Turkish population according to the IHS classification. Cephalalgia 1994;14:171-173 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1402171.x
  18. Chun WX. An approach to the nature of tension headache. Headache 1985;25:188-189 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.1985.hed2504188.x
  19. Gobel H, Petersen-Braun M, Soyka D. The epidemiology of headache in Germany : A nationwide survey of a representative sample on the basis of the headache classification of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 1994;14:97-106 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1402097.x
  20. Lavados P, Tenhamm E. Epidemiology of tension-type headache in Santiago, Chile. Cephalalgia 1998;18: 552-558 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1998.1808552.x