Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain

  • 제34권3호
  • /
  • Pages.317-324
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2288-9272(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-8493(eISSN)
대한안면통증구강내과학회 (Korean Academy of Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine)
권호 표지

저작근통 환자에서 저작근 및 안면표정근의 경도와 탄성도 평가

Stiffness and Elasticity of the Masticatory and Facial Expression Muscles in Patients with the Masticatory Muscle Pain

  • 김연신 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 김기석 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실) ;
  • 김미은 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강내과학교실)
  • Kim, Yeon-Shin (Dept. of Oral Medicine, Dankook University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Suk (Dept. of Oral Medicine, Dankook University School of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Mee-Eun (Dept. of Oral Medicine, Dankook University School of Dentistry)
  • 발행 : 2009.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

저작근장애 환자의 근육 평가를 위해 촉진과 압력통각역치가 주로 이용되어 왔으나, 본 연구는 근육의 경도와 탄성도을 정량적으로 측정할 수 있는 촉각센서를 이용하여 저작근을 평가하고, 저작근장애가 안면표정근에 영향을 미칠 수 있는지 조사하고자 하였다. 연구 대상은 단국대학교 치과병원 구강내과를 내원한 환자 중 편측 교근에 통증과 압통이 있는 저작근장애 환자 27명으로서 평균연령 $36.4{\pm}13.8$세였다. 근통 외에 턱관절의 이상이나 다른 통증 질환을 함께 가진 환자는 제외하였다. 촉각센서는 Venustron(Axiom Co., JAPAN)을 사용하여 전측두근, 교근, 전두근, 하안륜근, 대관골근, 상하구륜근, 이근에 대한 경도와 탄성도를 측정하였다. 이환측과 비이환측의 근육 경도와 탄성도를 비교하였으며 진단에 따라 국소근동통군과 근막동통군으로 분류하여 비교하였고, 6개월을 기준으로 급성군과 만성군으로 나누어 비교하였다. 편측 저작근장애가 있는 환자의 이환측과 비이환측을 비교했을 때 이환측의 교근과 대관골근에서 근육 경도가 유의성 있게 증가하였고 탄성도는 유의성 있게 감소하였다(p<0.05). 급성군과 만성군, 국소근동통군과 근막동통군 사이에는 유의한 차이없이 이환측 교근과 대관골근에서 경도가 증가하고 탄성도는 감소하였다. 이상의 결과는 교근에 발생한 저작근통은 교근 뿐아니라 안면표정근인 대관골근의 탄성도과 경도에도 영향을 줄 수 있음을 보여준다.

This study aimed to assess stiffness and elasticity of the masticatory muscle in the patients with the masticatory muscle pain using a tactile sensor and to investigate whether the masticatory muscle pain affects the facial expression muscles. From those who visited Department of Oral Medicine in Dankook University Dental Hospital, 27 patients presenting with unilateral muscle pain and tenderness in the masseter muscle (Ms) were selected (mean age: $36.4{\pm}13.8$ years). Exclusion criterion was those who also had temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders or any neurological pain. Muscle stiffness and elasticity for the muscles of mastication and facial expression was investigated with the tactile sensor (Venustron, Axiom Co., JAPAN) and the muscles measured were the Ms, anterior temporal muscle (Ta), frontalis (Fr), inferior orbicularis oculi (Ooci), zygomaticus major (Zm), superior and inferior orbicularis oris (Oors, Oori) and mentalis (Mn). t-tests was used to compare side difference in muscle stiffness and elasticity. Side differences were also compared between diagnostic groups (local muscle soreness (LMS) vs myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) and between acute (< 6M) and chronic ($\geq$ 6M) groups. This study showed that Ms and Zm at affected side exhibited significantly increased stiffness and decreased elasticity as compared to the unaffected side.(p<0.05) There was no significant difference between local muscle soreness and myofascial pain syndrome groups and between acute and chronic groups. The results of this study suggests that masticatory muscle pain in Ms can affect muscle stiffness and elasticity not only for Ms but also for Zm, the facial expression muscle.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Okeson JP. Bell's orofacial pains $6^{th}$ed., Chicago, 2005, Quintessence, pp.287-311
  2. Selye H. Stress without distress. Philadelphia, 1974, Lippincott, pp.32
  3. Schiffman EL, Fricton JR, Haley D. The relationship of occlusion, parafunctional habits and recent life events to mandibular dysfunction in a non-patient population. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:201-223 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01095.x
  4. McCreary CP, Clark GT, Merril RL, Flack V, Oakley ME. Psychological distress and diagnostic subgroups of temporomandibular disorder patients. Pain 1991;44:29-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(91)90143-L
  5. Carlson CR, Okeson JP, Falace DA et al. Comparison of psychologic and physiologic functioning between patients with masticatory muscle pain and matched controls. J Orofac Pain 1993;7:15-22
  6. Molin C. Vertical isometric muscle forces of the mandible. A comparative study of subjects with and without manifest mandibular pain dysfunction syndrome. Acta Odontol Scand 1972;30:485-499 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357209002499
  7. Wolff HG. Headache and Other Head Pain, $2^{nd}$ ed, New York, 1963, Oxford University Press
  8. Nozomi T, Toshimichi I, Kazunori Y. Electromyographic activity of lower lip muscles when chewing with the lips in contact and apart. Angle Orthod 2004;74:31-36
  9. Wohlert AB. Goffman L. Human perioral muscle activation patterns. J Speech Hear Res 1994;37:1032-1040 https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3705.1032
  10. Schieppati M, Di Francesco G, Nardone A. patterns of activity of perioral facial muscles during mastication in man. Exp Brain Res 1989;77:103-112 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00250572
  11. Naeije M, Zorn H. Changes in the power spectrum of the surface electromyogram of the human masseter muscle due to local muscle fatigue. Archs oral Biol 1983;26:409-412 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(81)90038-8
  12. Palla S, Ash MM. Power spectral analysis of the surface electromyogram of human jaw muscles during fatigue. Archs oral Biol 1981;26:547-553 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(81)90016-9
  13. Lindstrom L. Hellsing G. Masseter muscle fatigue in man objectively quantified by analysis of myoelectric signals. Archs oral Biol 1983;28:197-301 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(83)90071-7
  14. Katayama H, Inada J. Evaluation of muscle fatigue in the masseter muscle using a tactile sensor. Journal of the Osaka Odontology Society 2000;63:23-32
  15. Plesh O, Sinisi SE, Crawford PB et al. Diagnoses based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders in a biracial population of young women. J Orofac Pain 2005;19:65-75
  16. www.axiom-j.co.jp
  17. Rohen JW, Yokochi C, Lutjen-Drecoll E et al. Color atlas of anatomy. 4th ed. Philadelphia, 1998, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
  18. Lapatki BG, Stegeman DF, Jonas IE. A surface EMG electrode for the simultaneous observation of multiple facial muscles. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2003;123:117-128 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00323-0
  19. Bentsianov B, Blitzer A. Facial anatomy. Clin Dermatol 2004;22:3-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2003.11.011
  20. Fridlund AJ, Cacioppo JT. Guidelines for human electromyographic research. Psychophysiology 1986;23: 567-589 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00676.x
  21. Oh YR, Kim ME, Kim KS. Reliability of muscle evaluation with a tactile sensor system. Korean J Oral Med 2005;30:337-344
  22. Inada J, Katayama H, Yoshida Y. Research pertaining to the hardness/soft of the facial muscles and the soft tissue of the inner oral cavity. Japanese Journal of Oral Biology 1998;40:160
  23. Kim SK, Kim ME, Kim KS. Effects of oral parafunction on the stiffness and elasticity in the muscles of the mastication and facial expression. Korean J Oral Med 2008;33:85-95