한국항만경제학회지 (Journal of Korea Port Economic Association)

  • 제25권4호
  • /
  • Pages.21-44
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1225-3855(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2714-1330(eISSN)
한국항만경제학회 (The Korea Port Economic Association)
권호 표지

한국 기업의 물류아웃소싱 활용요인에 관한 연구

An Approach to the Logistics Outsourcing Factors of the Korean Companies

  • 투고 : 2009.10.21
  • 심사 : 2009.11.16
  • 발행 : 2009.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 한국 기업의 계약 기간에 따른 물류아웃소싱의 패턴을 분석하여 물류기업의 경쟁력 향상에 기여하는데 목적이 있으며, 문헌연구와 실증분석을 병행하여 실시하였다. 설문조사는 2008년 4월부터 5월까지 2개월 간 진행하였다. 총 400개의 물류기업을 대상으로 설문을 배포한 결과 165부의 설문지를 회수하였으며 분석에 적합한 설문 155부를 대상으로 분석을 실시하였다. 요인분석과 요인별 중요도 분석결과 본 연구의 시사점은 크게 세 가지로 요약할 수 있다. 첫째, 한국기업은 물류아웃소싱 동기로서 기업의 전략과 관련된 요인을 중요시한다. 아웃소싱에 대한 결정은 최고경영자에 의해서 이루어지며, 기업은 해외진출 및 해외진출시 제품경쟁전략에 따라 물류아웃소싱을 검토하게 되고 최고경영자의 해외 진출 및 국제화에 대한 의지 정도, 해외에서 판매되는 자사 제품의 판매 전략에 따라 물류아웃소싱의 활용에 크게 영향을 준다. 둘째, 한국기업은 고객요구에 대한 대응정도, 경쟁의 정도에 따라 물류아웃소싱을 고려하며 기업의 특성, 물류비용, 제품의 물리적 특성 등을 감안하여 물류아웃소싱을 결정하게 된다. 셋째, 계약기간에 따른 물류아웃소싱에 대한 차이를 분석한 결과 시장진출요인은 계약기간에 따른 시사점이 도출되지 않았으나 기업전략, 기업특성, 환경 측면에서는 장기간의 계약관계가 중요하게 인식되었다. 상술한 연구결과를 토대로 아웃소싱의 동기, 결정요인과 계약기간을 고려하여 당사자의 입장 차이를 줄이기 위해 정확한 계약조건제시와 주기적인 의사소통을 토대로 물류아웃소싱의 효과를 높여야 할 것이다.

This study aims to understand the conditions for using logistics outsourcing of Korean enterprises, present existing problems, examine factors affecting utility, and analyze the pattern of logistics outsourcing based on contract term, and to ultimately contribute to enhancing competitiveness of logistics enterprises. Through the literature survey 8 factors were identified as three broad factors of corporate strategy, corporate characteristics, and environment. Factor analysis was conducted on the bases of 155 collected data among 400 distributions for 2 months from April to May in 2008. From the result of analysis, the implication and finding can be summarized into three aspects. Firstly, Korean companies value factors relative to corporate strategies as motivating factors for logistics outsourcing. Secondly, Korean companies consider logistics outsourcing depending on how to handle customers' demands and the severity of competition. Thirdly, it was found that product and organization characteristics are perceived as more important when contract term with logistics business is longer. The implications can be observed into two aspects. Firstly once the logistics outsourcing between manufacturers and logistics companies are determined, it was verified that mutual agreement, particular contracts and periodic communications can increase the outcome. Secondly the logistics outsourcing appeared to be different depending on the level of entering to foreign market and resulted in higher performance as well.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Africk, J. M. & C. S. Calkins, "Does Asset Ownership Mean Better Service?,"Transportation & Distribution, Vol.35, No.5, 1994.
  2. Berglund, Magnus, Peter van Laarhoven, Graham Sharman & Sten Wandel, "Third- Party Logistics: Is There a Futrure?," The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol.1, No.1, 1999.
  3. Datamonitor, Us Logistics, 2003.
  4. Korea International Trade Association, 2006 Corporate logistics cost research and corporate logistics cost estimation report, 2007.
  5. Korea International Trade Association, Study for understanding use of 3rd party logistics services of import/export companies, 2006.
  6. Korea Transportation Institute, Improvement plan for integrated logistics for strengthening competitiveness of Logistics industry, 2004, p. 73.
  7. Korea Transportation Institute, 2004 National Logistics Cost Estimation, 2006.
  8. La Londe, B. J. and R. F. Power, "Disintegration and Reintegration: Logistics of the 21st century," International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol.4, No.2, 1993.
  9. Lee Jae Hyeon, "An empirical study on the effect of e-logistics on the cooperative relation of global logistics", Journal of Korea Trade, Vol.18, No.2, 2003, pp. 117-143.
  10. Lee Jae Yul, Park Young Jae, Park Chan Ik, Lee Jae Won, "The Effects of Critical Success Factors on Customer Satisfaction in 3PL Business," Korea Logistics Review, Vol.17, No.4, 2007, pp. 29-49.
  11. Lim Suk Min, "A Perspective of the 3PL and the 4PL," Korea Logistics Review, Vol.16, No.1, 2006, pp. 89-112.
  12. Lynch, C. F., "Managing the Outsourcing Relationship," Supply Chain Management Review, Vol.4, No.4, 2000.
  13. Muller, E. J., "Selling the Process, not just the Product," Distribution, Vol.90, No.1, 1991.
  14. Ruygrok, C. M. & B. Knippenberg, Successful Strategies of Logistics Service Providers for Creating Competitive Advantage through using information technology: the Case of The Netherlands, the Netherlands, 1994.
  15. Song Gye Eui, "A Study on Success Factors of 3rd Party Logistics Firms in Korea," Korea Logistics Review, Vol.16, No.3, 2006, pp. 155-175.
  16. The Logistics Institute at Georgia Tech, Cap Gemini Ernst & Young US LLC and FedEx, Supply Chain Services, Third Party Logistics-Results and Findings of the 2003 Eight Annual Study, 2003.
  17. Transport Intelligence, Global Supply Chain Intelligence Portal, 2006.