A Survey on Americans' Area Perceptions for Korean Commercial Kimchi

미국인의 김치에 대한 지역별 인식 조사

  • Received : 2009.08.10
  • Accepted : 2009.10.14
  • Published : 2009.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was conducted to investigate the perception of Korean kimchi among Americans' living in different areas in the United States. A questionnaire was given to males 126 (40.4%) and females 186 (59.6%) residing in Illinois and California. The results were as follows: 86.0% of the participants answered that kimchi was Korean in origin, and 84.1% reported that they had eaten kimchi. Additionally, 56.8% and 52.3% of the respondents in Illinois and California had purchased commercial kimchi at home-made. Among the kimchi they had experienced, out of the total respondents, 92.4% had eaten baechu kimchi, 45.5% had eaten mu kimchi and 42.4% had eaten oi kimchi (When the responses from the residents of Illinois were evaluated: 100.0% of the respondents had eaten baechu kimchi, while 47.7% had eaten mu kimchi, and 40.9% had eaten bak kimchi. Evaluation of the responses of residents from California revealed that: 88.6% had eaten baechu kimchi, 45.5% had eaten oi kimchi, and 44.3% had eaten mu kimchi respectively). For evaluation of the their kimchi preference of the overall population revealed that, 71.0% preferred baechu kimchi, 9.2% oi kimchi, and 8.4% mu kimchi (Of the respondents in Illinois: 69.8% preferred baechu kimchi, 14.0% mu kimchi and 7.0% bak kimchi, while for Californians: 71.6% preferred baechu kimchi, 11.4% oi kimchi and 8.0% bak kimchi, respectively). Regarding the primary reason they purchased commercial kimchi, 64.9% responded 'its taste' (67.4% in Illinois and 63.6% in California), additionally, 40.0% stated of the package they purchased was 200g (51.2% in Illinois and 34.5% in California). After having eaten kimchi, 45.5% answer reported that it tasted good, and the their primary reason for liking kimchi was its, 'spicy and hot taste' (51.3%), The main reasons for not liking kimchi were the odor (garlic, ginger, anchovy juice, etc) and it being too spicy, respectively. Regarding improvements for its expanded consumption, 25.0% answered 'not to improve', 22.7% answered 'reduce the strength of the strong seasoning', and 20.5% answered 'to allow over-ripening'.

Keywords

References

  1. Cheigh HS, Park KY (1994) Biochemical, microbiological and nutritional aspects of kimchi(Korean fermented vegetable products). Crit Rev in Food Sci Nutr 342: 175-203.
  2. Choi SM, Jeon YS, Rhee SH, Park KY (2002) Red pepper powder and kimchi reduce body weight and blood and tissue lipids in rats fed a high fat diet. Nutraceu Food 7: 162-167. https://doi.org/10.3746/jfn.2002.7.2.162
  3. Correa P (1995) The role of antioxidants in gastric carcinogenesis. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 35: 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408399509527687
  4. Han JS, Choi YH, Kim YJ (1999) A survey of Japanese perception and preference of kimchi. Korean J Soc Food Sci 15: 42-49.
  5. Han JS, Han GP, Han GJ, Kim YJ (2005b) A survey on Chinese in Beijing and Shanghai perception and preference for Korean kimchi. Korean J Food Culture 20: 744-753.
  6. Han JS, Han GP, Han GJ, Kim YJ (2007b) A survey on Singapore university students' perceptions and preference for Korean kimchi. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 17: 780-788.
  7. Han JS, Han GP, Lee JS, Kim YJ (2005a) A survey on Chinese university students' in Beijing perception for Korean kimchi. Korean J Food Culture 20: 754-760.
  8. Han JS, Han GP, Lee JS, Kim YJ (2007a) A survey on Singapore university students' perceptions of Korean commercial kimchi. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 17: 490-498.
  9. Han JS, Han GP, Minamide Takahisa, Lee SE, Kim YJ (2004) A survey on Chinese university students' in Shanghai perception for Korean kimchi. Korean J Food Culture 19: 701-709.
  10. Han JS, Hong JH, Suh BS (2001) Chinese college students perception and preference for Korean kimchi. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 11: 44-55.
  11. Han JS, Kim JS, Kim SY, Kim MS (1998) A survey of Japanese perception and preference of Korean Foods. Korean J Soc Food Sci 14: 188-194.
  12. Han JS, Kim SY (2000) A study on American university students' perception and preference for Korean kimchi. J Human Ecology 38: 167-177.
  13. Kim HT, Park JY, Lee GG, Kim JH (2003) Isolation of bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus plantarum strain from kimchi. Food Sci Biotechnol 12: 166-170.
  14. Kim MH, Shin MS, Jhon DY, Hong YH, Lim HS (1987) Quality characteristics of kimchies with different ingredients(in Korean). J Korean Soc Food Nutr 16: 268-277.
  15. Kim SY, Han JS, Suh BS (2000) A study on America university students' perception and preference for Korean kimchi. J of the Korean Home Economics Association 38: 167-177.
  16. Kim YM, Kim YJ, Jeong MK (2004) Preference and eating activities of Chinese for traditional Korean kimchi. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutri 33: 1641-1645. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2004.33.10.1641
  17. Lee JH, Cho Y, Hwang IK (1998) Fermentative characteristics of kimchi prepared by addition of different kinds of minor ingredients. Korean J Soc Food Sci 14: 1-8.
  18. Machlin LJ (1995) Critical assessment of the depidemiological data concerning the impact of antioxidant nutrients on cancer and cardiovascular disease. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 35: 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408399509527684
  19. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2004).
  20. Oh MS (1998) Comparative criteria for the quality characteristics of kimchi between Korean focus and American focus group. Korean J Soc Food Sci 14: 388-393.
  21. Park KY, Cheigh HS (2004) Kimchi (Chapter 12) Handbook of vegetable preservation and processing. Marcel Dekker. Inc New York. p 189-222.
  22. Park KY, Rhee SH (2001) Funtional properities and anticancer effect of kimchi. WO1-2, 11th World Congress of Food Science and Technology, Abstract book April 22-27, Seoul, Korea: 44.
  23. Ryu BM (2000) Effect of kimchi on inhibition of skin aging of hairless mouse. Ph D Dissertation Pusan National University, Busan.
  24. Slaga TJ(1995) Inhibition of skin tumor initiation, promotion and progression by antioxidants and related compounds. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 35: 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408399509527686