DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is the Arch Index Meaningful

  • Lung, Chi-Wen (Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Science) ;
  • Yang, Sai-Wei (Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University) ;
  • Hsieh, Lin-Fen (Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su memorial hospital)
  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

The foot type is classified into normal, high or low arch according to either foot print or medial longitudinal arch (MLA) height. Plantar fasciitis, heel pain, Achilles tendinitis, stress fracture, metatarsalgia, knee pain, shin splint pain, and etc are common foot disorders and associate to the foot type. The purpose of this study was to evaluate several suggested bony inclination used to classified the abnormal foot and if the arch index (AI) was correlated with foot morphology. Lateral view and dorso-plantar view of radiographic images and flatbed scanner measurements obtained from 57 college students were analyzed. Results showed that AI measured in this study was higher than Caucasian Americans and European, but similar with African. The ethnic origin could influent the AI distribution. The AI provided a simple quantitative means of assessing the structure of lateral and medial longitudinal arches. The correlation coefficients of true bone height with AI could be further improved by normalized foot width rather than foot length. AI also demonstrated as a good indicator of inclination between calcaneus-fifth metatarsal (CalM5) and calcaneus-first metatarsal (CalX), it is a good means to classify the foot type.

Keywords

References

  1. Arangio, G. A., & Salathe,E.P.(2001). Medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy reduces the excess forces in the medial longitudinal arch of the flat foot. Clinical Biomechanics, 16 (6), 535-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00011-0
  2. Aronson, J., Nunley, J., & Frankovitch, K.(1983). Lateral talocalcaneal angle in assessment of subtalar valgus: follow-up of seventy Grice-Green arthrodeses. Foot & Ankle International, 4 (2), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078300400202
  3. Braun, S., Basquin, L., & Mery, C.(1980). Some remarks on the contour of the normal foot. A statistical study. Rev. Rheum. Mal. Osteoartic, 47 (2), 127-133.
  4. Bryant, A., Tinley, P., & Singer, K.(2000). Radiographic measurements and plantar pressure distribution in normal, hallux valgus and hallux limitus feet. Foot, 10 (1), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.1054/foot.2000.0581
  5. Burns, J., & Crosbie, J.(2005). Weight bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in idiopathic pes cavus compared to normal and pes planus feet. The Foot, 15 (2), 91-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2005.03.003
  6. Cavanagh, P. R., & Rodgers, M. M.(1987). The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. Journal of Biomechanics, 20 (5), 547-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(87)90255-7
  7. Chen, C H., Huang, M. H., Chen, T. W., Weng, M. C., Lee, C. L., & Wang, G. J.(2006). The correlation between selected measurements from footprint and radiograph of flatfoot. Archives Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 87 (2), 235-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.014
  8. Daentzer, D., Wulker, N., & Zimmermann, U.(1997). Observations concerning the transverse metatarsal arch. Foot & Ankle Surgery, 3 (1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9584.1997.00039.x
  9. Gould, N.(1983). Evaluation of hyperpronation and pes planus in adults. Clinical Orthopaedics Related Research, (181), 37-45.
  10. Greisberg, J., Hansen, S. T., Jr., & Sangeorzan, B.(2003). Deformity and degeneration in the hindfoot and midfoot joints of the adult acquired flatfoot. Foot & Ankle International, 24 (7), 530-534.
  11. Hawes, M. R., Nachbauer, W., Sovak, D., & Nigg, B. M.(1992). Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height. Foot & Ankle International, 13 (1), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079201300104
  12. Hawes, M. R., Sovak, D., Miyashita, M., Kang, S. J., Yoshihuku, Y., & Tanaka, S.(1994). Ethnic differences in forefoot shape and the determination of shoe comfort. Ergonomics, 37 (1), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963637
  13. Igbigbi, P. S., & Msamati, B. C.(2002). The footprint ratio as a predictor of pes planus: a study of indigenous Malawians. Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery, 41 (6), 394-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1067-2516(02)80086-2
  14. Jahes, M. H., Kummer, F., & Michelson, J. D.(1992). Investigations into the fat pads of the sole of the foot: heel pressure studies. Foot & Ankle International, 13 (5), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079201300501
  15. Kalen, V., & Brecher, A.(1988). Relationship between adolescent bunions and flatfeet. Foot & Ankle International, 8 (6), 331-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110078800800609
  16. Kapandji, A. I. & Honore, L. H.(1970). The physiology of the joints : annotated diagrams of the mechanics of the human joints. Vol.2, Lower limb. E. & S. Livingstone, Edinburgh.
  17. Komeda, T., Tanaka, Y., Takakura, Y., Fujii, T., Samoto, N., & Tamai, S.(2001). Evaluation of the longitudinal arch of the foot with hallux valgus using a newly developed two-dimensional coordinate system. Journal of Orthopaedic. Science, 6 (2), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007760100056
  18. McCrory, J. L., Young, M. J., Boulton, A. J. M., & Cavanagh, P. R.(1997). Arch index as a predictor of arch height. The Foot, 7(2), 79-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-2592(97)90052-3
  19. McPoil, T. G., & Cornwall, M. W.(2006). Use of plantar contact area to predict medial longitudinal arch height during walking. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 96(6), 489-494. https://doi.org/10.7547/0960489
  20. Menz, H. B., & Munteanu, S. E.(2005). Validity of 3 clinical techniques for the measurement of static foot posture in older people. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 35(8), 479-486. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2005.35.8.479
  21. Menz, H. B.(2004). Two feet, or one person? Problems associated with statistical analysis of paired data in foot and ankle medicine. The Foot, 14, 2-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-2592(03)00047-6
  22. Moller, T. B.(2000). Normal findings in radiography. Thieme, New York.
  23. Queen, R. M., Mall, N. A., Hardaker, W. M., & Nunley, J. A.(2007). Describing the medial longitudinal arch using footprint indices and a clinical grading system. Foot & Ankle International, 28(4), 456-462. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0456
  24. Saltzman, C. L., Nawoczenski, D. A., & Talbot, K. D.(1995). Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Archives Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 76(1), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80041-7
  25. Simkin, A., & Leichter, I.(1990). Role of the calcaneal inclination in the energy storage capacity of the human foot--a biomechanical model. Medical & Biological Engineering & computing, 28(2), 149-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441770
  26. Tareco, J. M., Miller, N. H., MacWilliams, B. A., & Michelson, J. D.(1999). Defining flatfoot. Foot & Ankle International, 20(7), 456-460. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079902000711
  27. Thompson, G. H., Richardson, A. B., & Westin, G. W.(1982). Surgical management of resistant congenital talipes equinovarus deformities. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 64(5), 652-665.
  28. Van Schie, C. H. M., & Boulton, A. J. M.(2000). The Effect of Arch Height and Body Mass on Plantar Pressure. Wounds, 12(4), 88-95.
  29. Wearing, S. C., Hills, A. P., Byrne, N. M., Hennig, E. M., & McDonald, M.(2004). The arch index: a measure of flat or fat feet. Foot & Ankle International, 25(8), 575-581.
  30. Younger, A. S., Sawatzky, B., & Dryden, P.(2005). Radiographic assessment of adult flatfoot. Foot & Ankle International, 26(10), 820-825.

Cited by

  1. Normal values of foot arch parameters in adult Hausa population of Nigeria vol.15, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4103/1596-2393.200917
  2. The Influence of Percentage Weight-Bearing on Foot Radiographs pp.1938-7636, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640018810412