The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the degree of conversion of light-cured resin cement in regard to porcelain laminate thickness, light source and curing time using FT-IR

도재 라미네이트 두께와 광원 및 광조사 시간에 따른 광중합형 레진 시멘트의 FT-IR을 이용한 중합도 비교

  • Yuh, Chi-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Jee-Hwan (Department of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Jai (Department of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Keun (Department of Dental Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Shim, June-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Yonsei University)
  • 유지성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김지환 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김선재 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이용근 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과생체재료공학교실) ;
  • 심준성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2009.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem: The degree of light attenuation at the time of cementation of the PLV restoration depends on characteristics such as thickness, opacity and shade of the restorations, which interfere with light transmittance and, as a result, may decrease the total energy reaching the luting cement. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of conversion of light-cured resin cements measuring by FT-IR in regard to different thickness, light devices and curing time. Material and methods: In the control group, a clear slide glass (1.0 mm) was positioned between the light cured resin cement and light source. The specimens of ceramics were made with IPS Empress Esthetic. The ceramics were fabricated with varying thicknesses-0.5, 1.0, 1.5 mm with shade ETC1. Rely $X^{TM}$ Veneer with shade A3, light-cured resin cement, was used. Light-activation was conducted through the ceramic using a quartz tungsten halogen curing unit, a light emitting diode curing unit and a plasma arc curing unit. The degree of conversion of the light-cured resin cement was evaluated using FT-IR and OMNIC. One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test were used for statistical analysis ($\alpha$< .05). Results: The degree of conversion (DC) of photopolymerization using QTH and LED was higher than results of using PAC in the control group. After polymerization using QTH and LED, the DC results from the different ceramic thickness- 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm- did not show a significant difference when compared with those of control group. However, the DC for polymerization using PAC in the 1.5mm ceramic group showed significantly lower DC than those of the control group and 0.5 mm ceramic group (P<.05). At 80s and 160s, the DC of light-cured resin cement beneath 1.0 mm ceramic using LED was significantly higher than at 20s (P<.05). Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, when adhering PLV to porcelain with a thickness between 0.5-1.5 mm, the use of PAC curing units were not considered however, light cured resin cements were effective when cured for over 40 seconds with QTH or LED curing units. Also, when curing the light cured resin cements with LED, the degree of polymerization was not proportional with the curing time. Curing exceeding a certain curing time, did not significantly affect the degree of polymerization.

연구목적: 이번 연구의 목적은 PLV 수복물의 접착 시 사용되는 광중합형 레진 시멘트의 중합도를 Fronrier transform infrared spectroscope로 측정하여 도재의 두께, 광원 및 광조사 시간에 따른 중합도의 차이를 비교하기 위함이다. 연구재료 및 방법: 대조군으로는 1.0 mm의 투명한 slide glass를 사용하였고, 도재 시편은 IPS Empress Esthetic shade ETC1을 선택하여 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 mm의 두께로 제작하였다. 레진 시멘트는 광중합형 레진 시멘트인 Rely $X^{TM}$ Veneer Shade A3를 사용하였다. 광원으로는 Quartz Tungsten Halogen (QTH), Light Emitting Diode (LED), Plasma arc curing (PAC) 광중합기를 사용하였다. 레진 시멘트의 중합도는 FT-IR과 OMNIC 프로그램을 이용하여 측정하였다. 통계분석은 one-way ANOVA와 Tukey HSD를 이용하였다 ($\alpha$=0.05). 결과: 대조군에서 QTH와 LED로 광중합을 시행하였을 때 PAC로 광조사를 시행한 경우보다 중합도가 높았다. QTH와 LED로 광조사를 시행한 경우, 대조군과 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm의 도재 두께에서 유의차를 보이지 않았다. 반면, PAC로 광조사를 시행한 결과, 도재의 두께가 1.5 mm인 실험군의 중합도가 대조군과 0.5 mm에서 보다 통계적으로 유의하게 낮은 결과를 보인다 (P<.05). 두께가 1.0 mm의 도재와 LED 광중합기로 광조사하여 중합도를 비교한 결과, 20초간 광조사를 시행하였을 때와 비교하여 80초와 160초간 광조사를 시행한 경우 통계적으로 유의하게 중합도의 평균값이 높았다 (P<.05). 결론: 이번 연구의 한계 내에서, 도재의 두께가 0.5-1.5 mm 이내의 PLV 접착 시, PAC 중합기의 사용은 고려되지 않으며, QTH나 LED로 40초 이상 중합한다면 광중합형 레진 시멘트를 사용할 수 있다. 또한, 광중합형 레진 시멘트를 LED로 중합시킬 경우, 광조사 시간의 증가가 중합도의 증가와 비례하지 않으며, 일정시간 이상의 광조사가 중합도에 큰 영향을 끼치지 않는다.

Keywords

References

  1. Fradeani M. Six-year follow-up with Empress veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:216-25
  2. Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation-a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:9-17
  3. el-Mowafy OM, Rubo MH, el-Badrawy WA. Hardening of new resin cements cured through a ceramic inlay. Oper Dent 1999;24:38-44
  4. Blackman R, Barghi N, Duke E. Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:295-300 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90199-M
  5. Strang R, Macdonald I, O’Hagan S, Murray J, Stephen KW. Variations in performance of curing light units by determination of composite resin setting time. Br Dent J 1987;162:63-5 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4806026
  6. Nathanson D. Etched porcelain restorations for improved esthetics, part II: Onlays. Compendium 1987;8:105-10
  7. Rasetto FH, Driscoll CF, Prestipino V, Masri R, von Fraunhofer JA. Light transmission through all-ceramic dental materials: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:441-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.019
  8. Uctasli S, Hasanreisoglu U, Wilson HJ. The attenuation of radiation by porcelain and its effect on polymerization of resin cements. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:565-75 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01171.x
  9. Myers ML, Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of restoration composition, shade, and thickness on the cure of a photoactivated resin cement. J Prosthodont 1994;3:149-57 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00146.x
  10. Nathanson D, Banasr F. Color stability of resin cements-an in vitro study. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2002;14:449-55
  11. Calamia JR, Calamia CS. Porcelain laminate veneers: reasons for 25 years of success. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:399-417 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.008
  12. Asmussen E. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scandinavian J Dent Res 1982;90:484-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1982.tb00766.x
  13. Pianelli C, Devaux J, Bebelman S, Leloup G. The micro-Raman spectroscopy, a useful tool to determine the degree of conversion of light- activated composite resins. J Biome Mater Res 1999;48:675-81 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:5<675::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-P
  14. Jung H, Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Haller A, Schmalz G. Curing efficiency of different polymerization methods through ceramic restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2001; 5:156-61 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840100118
  15. Koch A, Kroeger M, Hartung M, Manetsberger I, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Friedl KH. Influence of ceramic translucency on curing efficacy of different light-curing units. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:449-62
  16. Tango RN, Sinhoreti MA, Correr AB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Henriques GE. Effect of light-curing method and cement activation mode on resin cement knoop hardness. J Prosthodont 2007;16:480-4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00234.x
  17. Borges GA, Agarwal P, Miranzi BA, Platt JA, Valentino TA, dos Santos PH. Influence of different ceramics on resin cement Knoop Hardness Number. Oper Dent 2008;33:622-8 https://doi.org/10.2341/07-155
  18. Matsumoto H, Gres JE, Marker VA, Okabe T, Ferracane JL, Harvey GA. Depth of cure of visible light-cured resin: clinical simulation. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:574-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90034-X
  19. Rueggeberg FA, Craig RG. Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 932-7 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670060801
  20. DeWald JP, Ferracane JL. A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res 1987;66:727-30 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660030401
  21. Pazin MC, Moraes RR, Goncalves LS, Borges GA, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L. Effects of ceramic thickness and curing unit on light transmission through leucitereinforced material and polymerization of dual-cured luting agent. J Oral Sci 2008;50:131-6 https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.50.131
  22. Moraes RR, Brandt WC, Naves LZ, Correr-Sobrinho L, Piva E. Light- and time-dependent polymerization of dualcured resin luting agent beneath ceramic. Acta Odontol Scand 2008;66:257-61 https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350802241563
  23. Feng L, Carvalho R, Suh BI. Insufficient cure under the condition of high irradiance and short irradiation time. Dent Mater 2009;25:283-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.007
  24. Woo YS, Kim S. A study on the mode of polymerization of light-cured restorative materials cured with plasma arc light curing unit. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 2002;29:262-9
  25. Pascal Magne UB. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition. Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc. 2002, 242-7
  26. Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Asmussen E. Characterization of resin composites polymerized with plasma arc curing units. Dent Mater 2000;16:330-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00025-7
  27. Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 1995;103:322-6 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb00033.x
  28. Maffezzoli A, Della Pietra A, Rengo S, Nicolais L, Valletta G. Photopolymerization of dental composite matrices. Biomaterials 1994;15:1221-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(94)90273-9
  29. Asmussen E. Softening of BISGMA-based polymers by ethanol and by organic acids of plaque. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92:257-61 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00889.x
  30. Ruyter IE, Svendsen SA. Remaining methacrylate groups in composite restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1978;36:75-82 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357809027569
  31. Klaiber B, Schubert K, Hugo B, Hofmann N. Comparison between a plasma arc light source and conventional halogen curing units regarding flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of photoactivated resin composites. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:140-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840000063