Cleft lip and palate patient treatment using self-ligating bracket and distraction osteogenesis: A case report

자가결찰 브라켓과 골신장술을 이용한 구순구개열 환자의 치험례

  • 문철현 (가천의과대 길치과병원 교정과) ;
  • 박선규 (가지런한 S 교정치과)
  • Published : 2009.10.01

Abstract

It is difficult to perform orthodontic treatment for cleft lip and palate patient. Although there are many orthodontic appliances to expand narrowed maxillary arch, results are rarely successful and the possibility of relapse is increased due to severe scars. Self-ligating bracket, recently used in orthodontic treatment, suggests solution of crowding by expansion of dental arches. Light and continuous force could apply for orthodontic movement due to characteristic low friction of self ligating bracket, which gives expansion force until dentition reaches its new equilibrium position and it can be expressed as spontaneous lateral expansion with heavy labial tension. This kind of expansion force is thought to be a possibility of expanding the constricted maxillary arch of cleft lip and palate patient. Repositioning of the maxilla by Le Fort I osteotomy in case of severe maxillary deficiency, increases the possibility of relapse because of limitation in anterior movement and adaptation of soft tissue. In these cases, distraction osteogenesis(DO) can be applied for stable result. We report a case of cleft lip and palate patient with narrowed maxillary arch and maxillary deficiency using self ligating bracket and DO.

Keywords

References

  1. Vanderas AP. Incidence of cleft lip, left palate, and cleft lip and palate among races: a review. Cleft palate J. 1987;24(3):216-225
  2. 이세일, 구개열. 성형외과학. 대한성형외과학회, 서울: 여문각. 1994.
  3. 전국치과대학 교정학 교수 협의회. 치과 교정학. 서울: 지성출판사. 1998.
  4. Bardach J, Morris H, Olin W et al. Late results of multidisciplinary management of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Ann Plast Surg. 1984;2:235-242.
  5. Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: An overview of treatment and facial growth. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24:5-77.
  6. Rosenstein S, Kerrahan D, Dado D, Grasseschi M, Griffith BH. Orthognathic surgery in cleft patients treated by early bone grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:835-839. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199105000-00003
  7. Willmar K: On Le Fort I osteotomy. A follow-up study of 106 operated patients with maxillo-facial deformity. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;12(0):suppl 12:1-68.
  8. Erbe M, Stoelinga PJ, Leene RJ. Long-term results of segmental repositioning of the maxilla in cleft palate patients without previously grafted alveolopalate clefts. J Craniomaxilloface Surg. 1996;24:109-117.
  9. Posnick JC, Taylor M. Skeletal Stability and relapse pattern after Le Fort I osteotomy using miniplate fixation in patients with isolated cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94:51-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199407000-00004
  10. Welch TB. Stability in the correction of dentofacial deformities; A comprehensive review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;47:1142-1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(89)90003-7
  11. Harradine NWT. Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J orthod. 2003;30: 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/30.3.262
  12. Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:472-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70069-9
  13. Sims APT, Waters NE, Birnie DJ, Pethybridge RJ. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation. Eur J Orthod 1993; 15:377-385. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/15.5.377
  14. Berger JL. The influence of the SPEED bracket's self-ligating design on force levels in tooth movement: a comparative in vitro study. Am J Orthod dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:219-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80055-1
  15. 문철현. 스피드 교정 orthodontic paradigm shift. 서울: 지성출판사 2008.
  16. Nikolaos P, Argy P, Tehodore E. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: A prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:208-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.030
  17. Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Ko EW. Maxillary distraction of the management of cleft maxillary hypoplasia with a rigid external distraction system. Semin Orthod. 1999;5:46-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(99)80042-5
  18. Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Rigid external distraction: its application in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:1360-1372. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199810000-00007
  19. Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Friede H, Ko EW. Long term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillay deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1382-1392.
  20. Pruzansky S, Addus H. Arch form and the deciduous dentition in complete and lateral cleft. Cleft Palate J. 1964;30:411-418. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1993)030<0411:HPOCLA>2.3.CO;2
  21. Read-Ward GE, Jones SP, Davies EG. A comparison of self ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. Br J Orthod. 1997;24:309-317. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/24.4.309
  22. Berger J, Byloff FK, Waram T. Supercable and the SPEED system. J Clin Orthod. 1998;32(4): 246-253.
  23. David B. The Damon passive self-ligating appliance system. Semin Orthod. 2008;14:19-35. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2007.12.003
  24. Ross RB. The clinical implications of facial growth in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1970;7:37-47.
  25. Mars Mouston WJB. A preliminary study of facial growth and morphology in unoperated male unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects over 13 years of age. Cleft Palate J. 1990;27:7-10. https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1990)027<0007:APSOFG>2.3.CO;2
  26. Ross RB. Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24:5-77.
  27. Ranta R. Forward traction of the maxilla with cleft lip and palate in mixed and permanent dentitions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1989;17:20-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(89)80033-2
  28. Eskenazi LB, Schendel SA. An analysis of Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patients. Palst Reconstr Surg. 1992;90:779-786. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199211000-00007
  29. Saelen R, Tornes K, Halse A. Stability after Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft lip and palate patients. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998;13:317-323.
  30. Erbe M, Stoelinga PJ, Leenen RJ. Long term results of segmental repositioning of the maxilla in cleft palate patients without previously grafted alveolo-palatal clefts. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1996;2(2):109-117.
  31. Obwegeser HL. Surgical correction of small or retro-displaced maxillae-the dish face deformity. Plas Reconstr Surg. 1969;43(4):351-365. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196904000-00003
  32. Stoelinga PJW. The prevention of relapse after maxillary osteotomies in cleft palate patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1987;15:326-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(87)80078-1
  33. Behrman SJ, Behrman DA. Oral surgeon's considerations in surgical orthodontic treatment. Dent Clin North Am. 1988;32:481-507.
  34. Posnick JC, Exing MP. Skeletal stability after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:706-710. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199005000-00009
  35. Figueroa AA, Polley JW. Management of severe cleft maxillary deficiency with distraction osteogenesis: Procedure and results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70310-0
  36. Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device. J Craniofac Surg. 1997;8:181-185. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199705000-00008
  37. Harada K, Baba Y, Ohyma K, Enomoto S. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate children using an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device: a report of 2 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59(12):1492-1496. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.28292
  38. Miki M. An experimental research on the directional of the nasomaxillary complex by means of the external force-two dimensional analysis on the sagittal plane of the craniofacial skeleton. J Tokyo Dent Coll. 1979;79:1563-1597.
  39. Hirato R. An experimental study on the center of resistance of nasomaxillary complex-two dimensional analysis on the coronal plane of the dry skull. J Tokyo Dent Coll. 1984:84:1225-1262.
  40. Nanda R. Biomechanical and clinical considerations of a modified protraction headgear. Am J Orthod. 1980;76:125-139.
  41. Ahn JG, Figueroa AA, Braun S, Polley JW. Biomechanical considerations on distraction of the osteotomized dentomaxillary complex. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:264-270 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70236-2
  42. Teuscher UM. A growth-related concept for skeletal Class II treatment. Am J Orthod. 1978;74:258-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(78)90202-6
  43. Braun S, Lee KG, Legan HL. A reexamination of various extraoral appliances in light of recent research findings. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:81-84.
  44. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop. 1989;239:263-285.
  45. Swennen G, Schliephake H, Dempf R et al. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Part1. Clinical studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30:89-103. https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2000.0033