DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Physicochemical Characteristics and Acceptability of Commercial Low-Priced French Wines

시판 저가 프랑스 와인의 이화학적 특성 및 기호도

  • Kim, Eun-Kyung (Dept. of Culinary Science and Food Service Management, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, In-Yong (Dept. of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University) ;
  • Ko, Jae-Youn (Dept. of Culinary Science and Food Service Management, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Yim, Seoung-Been (SloswFarm Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Jeong, Yoon-Hwa (Dept. of Food Science and Nutrition, Dankook University)
  • 김은경 (경희대학교 조리외식경영학과) ;
  • 김인용 (단국대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 고재윤 (경희대학교 조리외식경영학과) ;
  • 임성빈 ((주)슬로우팜) ;
  • 정윤화 (단국대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2010.11.08
  • Accepted : 2010.11.12
  • Published : 2010.11.30

Abstract

The physicochemical characteristics and acceptability of various commercial low-priced French wines were determined. A~E wines were manufactured from France and F wine was bottled in Germany using French Cabernet Sauvignon grape species. Sample wines were analyzed for pH, total soluble content, acidity, color, total sugar, total polyphenol and sulfur dioxide. The pH of the wines were ranged from 3.3 to 2.6. The total soluble contents were the highest in wine A (10.25 Brix%), followed by wine C (9.72 Brix%), wine D (9.67 Brix%) and wine B (9.61 Brix%) and were the lowest in wines E and F (9.42 Brix%). In the color analysis, wine F showed the highest L (lightness) and a (redness) value (28.11 and 23.86, respectively). The b (yellowness) value for all the samples studied ranged from 52.17 to 61.05. Wine C (62.24 g/L) and F (69.91 g/L) showed higher total sugar contents, and the total sugar contents of wines D, E, B and A were 48.58, 42.74, 37.74 and 36.99 g/L, respectively. Total polyphenol contents were the highest in wine C (2.59 g/L) and the lowest in wines A and B (1.90 g/L). The contents of sulfite in wine D (68.78 mg/L) were the highest and was the lowest in wine B (58.18 mg/L). The sensory characteristics and preference analysis (sourness, bitterness, sweetness, astringent taste, aroma, color and overall acceptability) of the red wines used in this study were determined by 15 panelists using the 7-point hedonic scale. Sourness of wines ranged between 3.8~4.9 and sweetness of wines D and F (3.0) were the highest amongst the red wines used in this study. Wines D, E and F had the higher scores in overall acceptability of sensory properties and wine E was the highest amongst the wines used in this study.

본 연구에서는 국내에 시판되고 있는 프랑스 Cabernet Sauvignon 품종의 저가 와인 6종을 선별하여 pH, 총고형량, 산도, 색도, 총당 함량, 폴리페놀 함량, 이산화황 함량 등의 이화학적 품질특성과 신맛, 쓴맛, 단맛, 향, 색 등의 기호도를 조사하였다. pH는 C 와인이 3.32로 가장 낮았고, A 와인이 3.65로 가장 높았으며, 3.3~3.6의 범위였다. 총고형량은 A 와인이 가장 높았고(10.25 Brix%), E, F 와인이 가장 낮았다(9.42 Brix%). 산도는 A 와인이 0.96%로 가장 높았고 F 와인이 0.56%로 가장 낮았다. 백색도(L)는 F 와인이 가장 높았고, 22~28의 범위이었다. 적색도(a)는 A 와인이 가장 낮았고, 6~23의 범위이었다. 황색도(b)는 F 와인이 가장 높았고, 52~61의 범위이었다. 총당 함량은 C, F 와인이 각각 62.24g/L와 69.91 g/L로 높은 값을 나타내었고 A, B 와인은 각각 36.99 g/L와 37.74 g/L이었다. 총 폴리페놀의 함량은 C 와인이 2.59 g/L로 가장 높았고 A, B 와인이 1.90 g/L로 가장 낮았다. 이산화황 함량은 D 와인이 68.78 mg/L로 가장 높았고, B 와인이 58.18 mg/L로 가장 낮았다. 7점 척도법으로 수행한 관능검사(신맛, 쓴맛, 단맛, 떪은 맛, 향, 색, 전체적인 기호도)에서는 신맛은 3.7~4.9, 쓴맛은 3.7~5.1, 단맛은 2.2~3.0, 떫은맛은 4.1~5.6, 향은 3.4~4.5, 색은 2.8~5.7, 전체적인 기호도는 2.8~4.6의 범위이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang EH, Jeong ST, Park KS, Yun HK, Roh JH, Jang HI, Choi JU. 2008. Characteristics of domestic and imported red wines. Korean J Food Preserv 15: 203-208.
  2. Kim HA, Cho MH, Lee KH. 2009. Studies on the sensory characteristics of Korean wine and imported wine. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 19: 593-602.
  3. Cho YJ, An BJ, Choi C. 1993. Isolation and enzyme inhibition of tannins from Korean green tea. Korean Biochem J 26: 216-223.
  4. Choi IS, Lee KH, Lee SS, Oh SH. 1997. Effects of tannin on lipid metabolism in 6 college women. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 26: 920-926.
  5. Kim JK, Cha WS, Park JH, Oh SL. 1997. Inhibition effect against tyrosinase of condensed tannins from Korean green tea. Korean J Food Sci Technol 29: 173-177.
  6. Cho SM, Kim JH, Lee MW. 2001. Inhibitory effects of tannins on tyrosinase activity. Kor J Pharmacogn 32: 68-71.
  7. Kim SS. 2009. Health function of wine and french paradox. Food Industry and Nutrition 41: 54-56.
  8. AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA. p 942.
  9. Dubois M, Gillers KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugar and related substance. Anal Chem 28: 350-352. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
  10. Swain T, Hillis WE. 1959. The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica. 1-The quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. J Sci Food Agric 10: 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740100110
  11. Kim CM, Song BJ, Na HS. 2000. Determination of sulfite contents in medicinal herbs. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 29: 375-379.
  12. Stone H, Sidel JL. 1985. Sensory evaluation practices. 2nd ed. Academic press Inc., New York, USA. p 45.
  13. Lee SJ, Lee JE, Kim SS. 2004. Development of Korean red wines using various grape varieties and preference measurement. Korean J Food Sci Technol 36: 911-918.
  14. Park WM, Park HG, Rhee SJ, Lee CH, Yoon KE. 2002. Suitability of domestic grape, cultivar campbell's early, for production of red wine. Korean J Food Sci Technol 34: 590-596.
  15. Kim TH, Yi DH, Kim HJ. 2009. Effect of resveratrol on wine sensory evaluation preference analysis. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 38: 1740-1745. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2009.38.12.1740
  16. Dourtogloub VG, Makris DP, Bois Dounas F, Zonas C. 1999. Trans-resveratrol concentration in wines produced in Greece. J Food Compost Anal 12: 227-233. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfca.1999.0821
  17. Roh HL, Chung EH, Jeong KW. 2008. Characteristics of formation and wine quality. Korean J Food Preserv 15: 317-324.
  18. Lee SH, Kim MH. 2009. Comparison of physicochemical and organoleptic characteristics of Omija wine made by different methods. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 38: 182-187. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2009.38.2.182
  19. Bae SM. 2002. Wine Making Principle. Bae Sang Myun Brewery Institute, Seoul, Korea. p 21-22.
  20. Park MH, Lee JO, Kim EJ, Kim JW, Lee HH, Kim HH, Lee SI, Kim YH, Ryu CH. 2008. Establishment of tannin enhancement conditions for development of high quality wild grape wine. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 37: 921-926. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.7.921
  21. Ribereau-Gayon P, Glories Y, Maujean A, Dubourdieu D. 2000. Phenolic compounds: The chemistry of wine stabilization and treatments. In Handbook of enology. Ribereau-Gayon P, ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, England. Vol 2, p 129-157.
  22. Pietta PG. 2000. Flavonoids as antioxidants. J Nat Prod 63: 1035-1042. https://doi.org/10.1021/np9904509
  23. Kim HJ, Jun BS, Kim SK, Cha JY. 2000. Polyphenolic compound content and antioxidative activities by extracts from seed, sprout and flower of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 29: 1127-1132.
  24. KFDA. 1999. Korean Food Code. Munyoungsa, Seoul, Korea. p 252.

Cited by

  1. Characteristics of Alcohol Fermentation in Oriental Melon by Different Yeast vol.18, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2011.18.5.779
  2. The antioxidant capacities of imported red wines (Cabernet Sauvignon) from US and Chile vol.20, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2013.20.5.608
  3. Physicochemical characteristics and volatile flavor compounds of produced mixture wine with kiwi and permission fruits using wild yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y28 vol.52, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7845/kjm.2016.5072
  4. Characteristics of Alcohol Fermentation in Citrus Hydrolysates through Narirutin Addition vol.19, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2012.19.1.153
  5. Comparison of Quality Characteristics of ‘Cheonghyang’ Wine fermented with Different Commercial Yeasts vol.26, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2016.12.26.6.543
  6. Application of indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae to improve the black raspberry (Rubus coreanus Miquel) vinegar fermentation process and its microbiological and physicochemical analysis pp.2092-6456, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0489-8
  7. Acetaldehyde contents and quality characteristics of commercial alcoholic beverages pp.2092-6456, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-019-00564-1
  8. Quality Characteristics of Grape Varieties for Making Wine vol.30, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2020.2.30.1.51