DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of Nonlocal Anisotropic Damage Model for the Reinforced Concrete Structures

철근콘크리트 구조물에 대한 비국소 이방성 손상모델의 적용

  • 우상균 (한국전력연구원 녹색성장연구소) ;
  • 권용길 (충북대학교 건설기술연구소) ;
  • 한상훈 (충북대학교 토목공학과)
  • Received : 2009.08.20
  • Accepted : 2010.05.08
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

This paper proposed a nonlocal anisotropic damage model to simulate the behavior of plain and reinforced concrete structures that are predominantly tensile and compressive load. This model based on continuum damage mechanics, used a symmetric second-order tensor as the damage variable. For quasi-brittle materials, such as concrete, the damage patterns were different in tension and in compression. These two damage states were modeled by damage evolution laws ensuring a damage tensor rate proportional to the total strain tensor in terms of principal components. To investigate the effectiveness of proposed model, the double edge notched specimen experimented by nooru-mohamed and reinforced concrete bending beam were analyzed using the implementation of the proposed model. As the results for the simulation, the nonlocal anisotropic damage model with an adequate control of rupture correctly represented the crack propagation for mixed mode fracture. In the structural failure of reinforced concrete bending beam, the proposed model can be showed up to a very high damage level and yielding of the reinforcements.

이 논문에서는 인장과 압축하중에 놓은 무근 콘크리트와 철근콘크리트 구조물의 거동을 모사하기 위해 비국소화 이방성 손상모델을 제안하였다. 손상변수로써 대칭형의 이차 텐서을 사용한 연속체 손상모델에 기초한다. 콘크리트와 같은 준-취성재료에 있어 손상양상은 인장부와 압축부에서 다른 양상을 나타낸다. 이러한 두 개의 손상영역은 전체 변형률 텐서의 주변형률 성분을 손상텐서 속도에 비례하는 손상진전 법칙을 이용하여 모델링하였다. 제안된 모델의 유효성을 검토하기 위해 nooru-mohamed에 의해 실시된 이중 노치가 있는 시험체와 철근콘크리트 휨 시험체를 대상으로 해석을 수행하였다. 해석결과, 비국소화 이방성 모델은 혼합모드 파괴에 대한 균열진전을 적절히 모사할 수 있었으며 철근콘크리트 휨 시험체의 구조적 파괴에 있어서도 높은 수준의 콘크리트 손상 및 철근의 항복까지를 해석할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 박중열(2003) 탄소섬유 보강판으로 보강된 철근콘크리트 보의 거동 특성 및 보강설계, 박사학위논문, 충북대학교.
  2. 이기성, 송하원(1996) 콘크리트의 탄-소성 이방성-손상모델, 전산구조공학회논문집, 한국전산구조공학회, 제8권 제1호, pp. 65-76.
  3. Aifantis, E.C. (1984) On the microstructural origin of certain inelastic models. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Vol. 106, pp. 326-330. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3225725
  4. Ananiev, S. and Ozbolt, J. (2004) Plastic-damage model for concrete in principal directions, Li, V. et al. (eds.). FraMCoS-5 Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures.
  5. Bazant, Z.P. (1976) Instability, ductility and size effect in strainsoftening concrete. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 331-344.
  6. Bazant Z.P. and Oh B-H. (1983) Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. Mater Struct, Vol. 16, pp. 155-157.
  7. Carol, I. and Bazant, Z.P. (1997) Damage and plasticity in microplane theory. International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 34, pp. 3807-3835. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00238-7
  8. Carol, I., Rizzi, E., and Willam, K. (1994) A unified theory of elastic degradation and damage based on a loading surface. International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 31, No. 20, pp. 2835-2855. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(94)90072-8
  9. Carol, I., Rizzi, E., and Willam, K. (2001a) On the formulation of anisotropic elastic degradation. I. Theory based on a pseudo logarithmic damage tensor rate, International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vo,. 4, No. 38, pp. 491-518.
  10. Carol, I., Rizzi, E., and Willam, K. (2001b) On the formulation of anisotropic elastic degradation. II. Generalized pseudo-Rankine model for tensile damage, International Journal of Solids and Structures, No. 4, No. 38, pp. 519-546.
  11. Carol, I. and William, K. (996) Spurious energy dissipation/generation in modeling of stiffness recovery for elastic degradation and damage. International Journal of Solids and Structures. Vol. 33, No, 20-22, pp. 2939-2957. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(95)00254-5
  12. Cervera, M. and Chiumenti, M. (2006) Smeared crack approach: back to the original track Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. Vol. 30, pp. 1173-1199. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.518
  13. Di Prisco, M., Ferrara, L., Meftah, F., Pamin, J., de Borst, R., Mazars, J., et al. (2000) Mixed mode fracture in plain and reinforced concrete: some results on benchmark tests. International Journal of Fractures (103), pp. 127-148.
  14. Dragon, A., Halm, D., and Desoyer, T. (2000) Anisotropic damage in quasi-brittle solid: modelling, computational issues and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 183, pp. 331-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00225-X
  15. Feenstra, P. (1993) Computational aspects of biaxial stress in plain and reinforced concrete. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Delft, The Netherlands.
  16. Galvez, J.C., Elices, M., Guinea, G.V., and Planas, J. (1998) Mixed mode fracture of concrete under proportional and nonproportional loading. International Journal of Fractures, Vol. 94, pp. 267-284. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007578814070
  17. Grassl, P. and Jirasek, M. (2005) Plastic model with nonlocal damage applied to concrete, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 30, pp. 71-90.
  18. Han, D.J. and Chen, W.F. (1986) Strain-space plasticity formulation for hardening-softening materials with elasto-plastic coupling. International Journal of Solids and Structures. Vol. 22, pp. 935-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(86)90072-7
  19. Jirasek, M. and Bazant, Z.P. (2002) Inelastic Analysis of Structures, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
  20. Ju, J.W. (1989) On energy-based coupled elastoplastic damage theories: constitutive modeling and computational aspects. International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 803-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(89)90015-2
  21. Krajcinovic, D. and Fonseka, G. (1981) The continuous damage theory of brittle materials; part 1. General theory, Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 48, pp. 809-815. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3157739
  22. Krajcinovic, D. (1996) Damage mechanics, Vol. 41 of North-Holland Series In Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Elsevier.
  23. Lemaitre, J. (1991) A Course on Damage Mechanics. Springer.
  24. Mazars, J. and Lemaitre, J. (1984) Application of continuous damage mechanics to strain and fracture behavior of concrete. In: Shah, S.P.(Ed.), Application of Fracture Mechanics to Cementitious Composites, Evanston, IL, pp. 375-378.
  25. Mazars, J. and Pijaudier-Cabot, G. (1989) Continuum damage theory : Application to concrete. ASCE J. Engng. Mech. Vol. 115, pp. 345-365. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:2(345)
  26. Nooru-Mohamed, M.B. (1992) Mixed-mode fracture of concrete: an experimental approach. Ph.D thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
  27. Ozbolt, J. and Ananiev, S. (2003) Scalar damage model for concrete without explicit evolution law. In: Bicanic, N., et al (eds.). Proceedings of the EURO-C 2003 Conference on Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures. Swets & Zeitlinger B.V., Lisse.
  28. Pazak, B. and Jirasek, M. (2003) Adaptive simulation of quasi-brittle failure. In Computational Modelling of Concrete Structures, Proceedings of EURO-C 2003 Conference, Bicanic N, de Borst R, Mang H, Meschke G (eds). St. Johann im Pongau, Austria. A.A. Balkema Publishers: Rotterdam.
  29. Saouridis, C. and Mazars, J. (1992) Prediction of the failure and size effect in concrete via bi-scale damage approach. Engineering Computations (9), pp. 329-44.
  30. Simo, J.C. and Ju, J.W. (1987) Stress and strain based continuum damage models, Part I and II. International Journal of Solids and Structures. (23), pp. 375-400.
  31. Valanis, K.C. (1990) A theory of damage in brittle materials. Engng. Fract. Mech. (36), pp. 403-416.