Asia pacific journal of information systems

The Korea Society of Management Information Systems (한국경영정보학회)
권호 표지

An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Supply Chain Management Systems Success from Vendor's Perspective

참여자관점에서 공급사슬관리 시스템의 성공에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 실증연구

  • Kang, Sung-Bae (College of Business Administration, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Moon, Tae-Soo (Department of Information Management, Kongguk University) ;
  • Chung, Yoon (College of Business Administration, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • Published : 2010.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The supply chain management (SCM) systems have emerged as strong managerial tools for manufacturing firms in enhancing competitive strength. Despite of large investments in the SCM systems, many companies are not fully realizing the promised benefits from the systems. A review of literature on adoption, implementation and success factor of IOS (inter-organization systems), EDI (electronic data interchange) systems, shows that this issue has been examined from multiple theoretic perspectives. And many researchers have attempted to identify the factors which influence the success of system implementation. However, the existing studies have two drawbacks in revealing the determinants of systems implementation success. First, previous researches raise questions as to the appropriateness of research subjects selected. Most SCM systems are operating in the form of private industrial networks, where the participants of the systems consist of two distinct groups: focus companies and vendors. The focus companies are the primary actors in developing and operating the systems, while vendors are passive participants which are connected to the system in order to supply raw materials and parts to the focus companies. Under the circumstance, there are three ways in selecting the research subjects; focus companies only, vendors only, or two parties grouped together. It is hard to find researches that use the focus companies exclusively as the subjects probably due to the insufficient sample size for statistic analysis. Most researches have been conducted using the data collected from both groups. We argue that the SCM success factors cannot be correctly indentified in this case. The focus companies and the vendors are in different positions in many areas regarding the system implementation: firm size, managerial resources, bargaining power, organizational maturity, and etc. There are no obvious reasons to believe that the success factors of the two groups are identical. Grouping the two groups also raises questions on measuring the system success. The benefits from utilizing the systems may not be commonly distributed to the two groups. One group's benefits might be realized at the expenses of the other group considering the situation where vendors participating in SCM systems are under continuous pressures from the focus companies with respect to prices, quality, and delivery time. Therefore, by combining the system outcomes of both groups we cannot measure the system benefits obtained by each group correctly. Second, the measures of system success adopted in the previous researches have shortcoming in measuring the SCM success. User satisfaction, system utilization, and user attitudes toward the systems are most commonly used success measures in the existing studies. These measures have been developed as proxy variables in the studies of decision support systems (DSS) where the contribution of the systems to the organization performance is very difficult to measure. Unlike the DSS, the SCM systems have more specific goals, such as cost saving, inventory reduction, quality improvement, rapid time, and higher customer service. We maintain that more specific measures can be developed instead of proxy variables in order to measure the system benefits correctly. The purpose of this study is to find the determinants of SCM systems success in the perspective of vendor companies. In developing the research model, we have focused on selecting the success factors appropriate for the vendors through reviewing past researches and on developing more accurate success measures. The variables can be classified into following: technological, organizational, and environmental factors on the basis of TOE (Technology-Organization-Environment) framework. The model consists of three independent variables (competition intensity, top management support, and information system maturity), one mediating variable (collaboration), one moderating variable (government support), and a dependent variable (system success). The systems success measures have been developed to reflect the operational benefits of the SCM systems; improvement in planning and analysis capabilities, faster throughput, cost reduction, task integration, and improved product and customer service. The model has been validated using the survey data collected from 122 vendors participating in the SCM systems in Korea. To test for mediation, one should estimate the hierarchical regression analysis on the collaboration. And moderating effect analysis should estimate the moderated multiple regression, examines the effect of the government support. The result shows that information system maturity and top management support are the most important determinants of SCM system success. Supply chain technologies that standardize data formats and enhance information sharing may be adopted by supply chain leader organization because of the influence of focal company in the private industrial networks in order to streamline transactions and improve inter-organization communication. Specially, the need to develop and sustain an information system maturity will provide the focus and purpose to successfully overcome information system obstacles and resistance to innovation diffusion within the supply chain network organization. The support of top management will help focus efforts toward the realization of inter-organizational benefits and lend credibility to functional managers responsible for its implementation. The active involvement, vision, and direction of high level executives provide the impetus needed to sustain the implementation of SCM. The quality of collaboration relationships also is positively related to outcome variable. Collaboration variable is found to have a mediation effect between on influencing factors and implementation success. Higher levels of inter-organizational collaboration behaviors such as shared planning and flexibility in coordinating activities were found to be strongly linked to the vendors trust in the supply chain network. Government support moderates the effect of the IS maturity, competitive intensity, top management support on collaboration and implementation success of SCM. In general, the vendor companies face substantially greater risks in SCM implementation than the larger companies do because of severe constraints on financial and human resources and limited education on SCM systems. Besides resources, Vendors generally lack computer experience and do not have sufficient internal SCM expertise. For these reasons, government supports may establish requirements for firms doing business with the government or provide incentives to adopt, implementation SCM or practices. Government support provides significant improvements in implementation success of SCM when IS maturity, competitive intensity, top management support and collaboration are low. The environmental characteristic of competition intensity has no direct effect on vendor perspective of SCM system success. But, vendors facing above average competition intensity will have a greater need for changing technology. This suggests that companies trying to implement SCM systems should set up compatible supply chain networks and a high-quality collaboration relationship for implementation and performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Aiken, L.S. and West, S.G., "Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions," Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1991.
  2. Angel, M.S. and Manuela, P.P., "EDI and the Moderator Effect of Inter-organizational Cooperation in the Supply Chain," Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2005. pp. 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327744joce1502_1
  3. Baron R.M. and Kenny, D.A., "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 6, 1986, pp. 1173-1182.
  4. Benjamin, R., Rockart, J. and Morton, S., "Information Technology: A Strategic Opportunity," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 3, Spring 1984, pp. 3-10.
  5. Bensaou, M., "Interorganizational Cooperation: The Role of Information Technology, An Empirical Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Supplier Relations," Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, June 1997, pp. 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.2.107
  6. Carte, T.A. and Russell, C.J., "In Pursuit of Moderation: Nine Common Errors and Their Solutions," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2003, pp. 479-501.
  7. Chandra, C. and Kumar, S., "Supply Chain Management in Theory and Practice: a Passing Fad or a Fundamental Change?," Industrial Management and Data System, Vol. 100, No. 3/4, 2000, pp. 100-113.
  8. Chang, S.I. and Tsia, Y.F., "Critical Factors of E-SCM Adoption on Small and Medium sized Enterprises Performance: an Empirical Study," International Journal of Electronic Business Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2006, pp. 159-172.
  9. Chau, P.Y.K and Hui, K.L., "Determinants of Small Business EDI Adoption: An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2001, pp. 229-252. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327744JOCE1104_02
  10. Chau, P.Y.K and Tam, K.Y., "Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open System: An Exploratory Study," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1997, pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/249740
  11. Chen, M.C, Yang, T., and Li, H.C., "Evaluating the Supply Chain Performance of IT-based Inter-enterprise Collaboration," Information and Management, Vol. 44, No. 6, 2007, pp. 524-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.02.005
  12. Chen, I.J. and Paulraj, A., "Towards a Theory of Supply Chain Management: the Constructs and Measurements," Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2004, pp. 119-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.007
  13. Chwelos, P., Benbasat, I., and Dexter, AS., "Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model," Information Systems Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2001, pp. 107-124.
  14. Cooper, M.C. and Ellram, L.M., "Characteristics of Supply Chain Management and the Implications for Purchasing and Logistics Strategy," International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1993, pp. 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574099310804957
  15. Cooper, R.B. and Zmud, R.W., "Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach," Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 2, 1990, pp. 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123
  16. Crook, C.W. and Kumar, R.L., "Electronic Data Interchange: a Multi-industry Investigation using Grounded Theory," Information and Management, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1998, pp. 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00040-8
  17. Elmuti, D., "The Perceived Impact of Supply Chain Management on Organizational 162 Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems Effectiveness," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2002, pp. 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00135.x
  18. Fawcett, S.E., Magnan, G.M., and McCarter, M.W., "A Three-Stage Implementation Model for Supply Chain Collaboration," Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 29. No. 1, 2008, pp. 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00070.x
  19. Frohlich, M.T. and Westbrook, R, "Demand Chain Management in Manufacturing and Services: Web-based Integration, Drivers and Performance," Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 20, No. 8, 2002, pp. 729-745.
  20. Galbraith, J.R., "Organization Design: An Information Processing View," Interfaces, Vol. 4, No. 3, 1974, pp. 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.4.3.28
  21. Grover, V. and Goslar, M.D., "The Initiation, Adoption, and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U.S. Organization," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1993, pp. 141-163.
  22. Grover, S. and Saeed, K.A., "The Impact of Product, Market, and Relationship Characteristics on Inter-organizational System Integration in Manufacturer-Supplier Dyads," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2007, pp. 185-216. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230409
  23. Gunasekaran, A. and Ngai, .E.W.T., "Information Systems in Supply Chain Integration and Management," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 159. No. 2, 2004, pp. 269-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.016
  24. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., and Tatham, R.L., Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2006.
  25. Hsu, C.C., Karman, V.R., Tan, K.C. and Leong, G.K., "Information Sharing, Buyer-supplier Relationships, and Finn Performance," International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2008, pp. 296-310. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810875391
  26. Hsu, P.F., Kraemer, K.L., and Dunkle, D., "Determinants of E-Business Use in U.S. Firms," International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2006, pp. 9-45. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415100401
  27. Iacovou, C.l., Benbasat, I., and Dexter, A.S., "Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organization: Adoption and Impact of Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 4, 1995, pp. 465-485. https://doi.org/10.2307/249629
  28. Johnston, DA, McCutcheon, D.M., Stuart, F.I., and Kerwood, H., "Effect of Supplier Trust on Performance of Cooperative Supplier Relationships," Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2004, pp. 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.001
  29. Kim, B. and Chung, Y., "The Relationship between Managerial Characteristics and Organizational Characteristics in EDI Systems Implementation," The Journal of MIS Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2003, pp. 171-197.
  30. Kim, C. and Seo, C., "The Mediation Effect of Collaboration on Supply Chain Performance: Mobile Networks Industry in Korea," The Journal of MIS Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2006, pp. 1-27.
  31. Kim, K.K., Umanath, N.S. and Kim, B.H., "An Assessment of Electronic Information Transfer in B2B Supply-Channel Relationships," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2005-6, pp. 293-320.
  32. King, W.R. and Teo, T.S.H., "Facilitators and Inhibitors for the Strategic use of Information Technology," Information and Management, Vol. 27, No. 2, August 1994, pp. 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(94)90008-6
  33. Kotzab, H., Grant, D.B. and Friis, A., "Supply Chain Management Implementation and Priority Strategies in Danish Organizations," Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 27. No. 2, 2006, pp. 273-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2006.tb00226.x
  34. Kuan, K.K.Y. and Chau, P.Y.K., "A Perception-based Model for EDI Adoption in Small Businesses using a Technology-Organization-Environment Framework," Information and Management, Vol. 38, No. 8, 2001, pp. 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00073-8
  35. Lambert, D.M., Cooper, M.C., and Pagh, J. D., "Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities," International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9, No. 2. 1998, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574099810805807
  36. Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V., and Whang, S., "The Bullwhip Effect in a Supply Chain," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, 1997, pp. 93-102.
  37. Lee, H.L. and Whang, S., "E-Business and Supply Chain Integration," Standford Global Supply Chain Management Forum, W2, 2001, pp. 1-20.
  38. Lee, S., "A Study on the Effects of Collaborative Supply Management on Buyer and Supplier Performance: From a View of Capabilities Transfer Throughout the Supply Chain," Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 85-104.
  39. Li, S. and Lin, B., "Accessing Information Sharing and Information Quality in Supply Chain Management," Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2006, pp. 1641-1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.02.011
  40. Massetti, B. and Zmud, R.W., "Measuring the Extent of EDI Usage in Complex Organizations: Strategies and Illustrative Examples," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 3, September 1996, pp. 331-345. https://doi.org/10.2307/249659
  41. Matopoulos, A, Vlachopoulou, M., Manthou, V. and Manos, B., "A Conceptual Framework for Supply Chain Collaboration: Empirical Evidence from the Agri-food Industry," Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2007, pp. 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540710742491
  42. Mentzer, J.T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J.S., Min, S., Nix, N.W., Smith, C.D., and Zacharia, Z.G., "Defining Supply Chain Management," Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2001, pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x
  43. Olsen, R.F. and Ellram, L.M., "A Portfolio Approach to Supplier Relationships," Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 26, No. 2. 1997, pp. 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(96)00089-2
  44. Patterson, K.A, Grimm, C.M, and Corsi, T. M., "Adopting New Technologies for Supply Chain Management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2003, pp. 95-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(02)00041-8
  45. Premkumar, G. and King, W.R., "An Empirical Assessment of Information Systems Planning and the Role of Information Systems in Organizations," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 9, No. 2, Fall 1992, pp. 99-125.
  46. Premkumar, G. and Ramamurthy, K., "The Role of Inter-Organizational and Organizational Factors on the Decision Mode for Adoption of Inter-Organizational System," Decision Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1995, pp. 303-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01431.x
  47. Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., and Saunders, C.S., "Information Processing View of Organizations: An Exploratory Examination of Fit in the Context of Interorganizational Relationships," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2005, pp. 257-294.
  48. Premkumar, G. and Roberts, M., "Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses," Omega, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1999, pp. 467-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00071-1
  49. Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., and Seth, N., "Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2006, pp. 225-246.
  50. Ragu-Nathan, B.S., Apigian, C.H., RaguNathan, T.S., and Tu, Q., "A Path Analytic Study of the Effect of Top Management Support for Information Systems Performance," The International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2004, pp. 459-471.
  51. Ramamurthy, K., Premkumar G., and Crum, M.R., "Organizational and Interorganizational Determinants of EDI Diffusion and Organizational Performance: A Causal Model," Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1999, pp. 253-1185. https://doi.org/10.1207/S153277440904_2
  52. Russell, D.M. and Hoag, A.M., "People and Information Technology in the Supply Chain: Social and Organizational Influences on Adoption," International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2004, pp. 102-122. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030410526914
  53. Ryu, I. and So,S., "The Factors Influencing Executive Decisions about Adoption of SCM in Small and Medium-sized Enterprise," The Journal of MIS Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 145-167.
  54. Shin, H., Collier, D.A. and Wilson, D.D., "Supply Management Orientation and Supplier/buyer Performance," Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 18. No. 3, 2000, pp. 317-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00031-5
  55. Simatupang T.M. and Sridharan, R., "The Collaborative Supply Chain," The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2002, pp. 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090210806333
  56. Soliman, K.S. and Janz, B.D., "An Exploratory Sudy to Identify the Critical Factors Affecting the Decision to Establish Internet-based Inter-organizational Information Systems," Information and Management, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2004, pp. 697-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.06.001
  57. Subramani, M., "How do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology use in Supply Chain Relationships?," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2004, pp. 45-73.
  58. Tan, K.C., Karman, V.R., Handfield, R.B. and Ghosh, S., "Supply Chain Management and Empirical Study of its Impact on Performance," International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 19, No. 10, 1999, pp. 1034-1052. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910287064
  59. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen A., "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, 1997, pp. 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  60. Teo, T.S.H. and Too, B.l., "Information Systems Orientation and Business Use of the Internet: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Electronic commerce, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2000, pp. 105-130.
  61. Thong, J.Y.L., "An Integrated Model of Information Systems Adoption in Small Businesses," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1999, pp. 187-214.
  62. Wu, F., Yeniyurt, S., Kim, D., and Cavusgil, S.T., "The Impact of Information Technology on Supply Chain Capabilities and Firm Performance: A Resource-Based View," Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2006, pp. 493-504.
  63. Wu, L., "Applicability of the Resource-based and Dynamic Capability Views under Environmental Volatility," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2010, pp. 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.007
  64. Yao, Y., Palmer, J., and Dresner, M., "An Inter-organizational Perspective on the use of Electronically-enabled Supply Chains," Decision Support Systems, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2007, pp. 884-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.01.002
  65. Zailani, S. and Rajagopal, P., "Supply Chain Integration and Performance: US versus East Asian Companies," Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2005, pp. 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540510624205
  66. Zhu, K., Kraemer, K.L. and Xu, S., "Electronic Business Adoption by European Firms: A Cross country Assessment of the Facilitators and Inhibitors," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2003, pp. 251-268. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000475
  67. Zhu, K., Kraemer, K.L., and Xu, S., "The Process of Innovation Assimilation by Firms in Different Countries: A Technology Diffusion Perspective on E-Business," Management Science, Vol. 52, No. 10, 2006, pp. 1557-1576. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0487