DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Agariemycetes Supplementation on Egg Quality and Fecal Noxious Gas Concentration in Laying Hens

사료내 Agariemycetes 첨가 급여가 산란계의 계란 품질 및 분내 유해 가스 농도에 미치는 영향

  • 정지홍 (단국대학교 동물자원학과) ;
  • 김효진 (단국대학교 동물자원학과) ;
  • 왕건평 (단국대학교 동물자원학과) ;
  • 김채현 ((주)고려비엔피 기술연구소) ;
  • 정청환 ((주)고려비엔피 기술연구소) ;
  • 김인호 (단국대학교 동물자원학과)
  • Received : 2010.04.22
  • Accepted : 2010.05.31
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate effects of dietary Agariemycetes on egg quality and fecal noxious gas concentration in laying hens. A total of two hundred forty laying hens were randomly allocated to four treatments with five replicates of twelve chicks per pen. The experiment lasted 42 days with a 7-day adjustment period. Dietary treatments were as follows: 1) CON (basal diet), 2) A1 (basal diet + Agariemycetes 0.1%), 3) A3 (basal diet + Agariemycetes 0.3%) and 4) A5 (basal diet + Agariemycetes 0.5%). There was no significant difference in egg production and egg weight between CON and Agariemycetes treatments. During the second week of the experiment, eggshell breaking strength was higher in A3 and A5 treatments than that in CON treatment (P<0.05). Besides, eggshell breaking strength in P5 treatment was higher when compared with that in CON treatment (P<0.05) in the sixth week. During the second week of the experiment, eggshell thickness was higher in Agariemycetes treatments than CON treatment (P<0.05). Also, A5 treatment was higher than other treatments in the fourth week of the experiment (P<0.05). At the end of the second week, yolk color unit in A5 treatment was lower compared with CON treatment (P<0.05). During the fourth week of the experiment, CON treatment was higher than A3 treatment (P<0.05). During the second week of the experiment, Haugh unit in A3 treatment was greater than that in CON treatment (P<0.05). At the end of six weeks, Haugh unit in CON treatment was lower than other treatments (P<0.05). Fecal ammonia and hydrogen sulfide were increased in Agariemycetes treatments when compared with CON treatment (P<0.05). Compared with CON and A5 treatments, fecal mercaptans was higher than in other treatments in first of the experiment (P<0.05). In conclusion, this study indicated that the addition of Agariemycetes in the diet improved the egg quality and decreased the feacal noxious gas concentration in laying hens.

본 연구는 산란계에 Agariemycetes 첨가 급여에 따른 계란 품질 및 분내 유해 가스 농도에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위하여 시험을 실시하였다. 사양 시험은 55주령 ISA Brown 240수를 공시하였으며, 사료에 대한 7일간의 적응 기간 후 6주간 사양 시험을 실시하였다. 시험 설계는 1) CON(basal diet), 2) A1(basal diet + Agariemycetes 0.1%), 3) A3(basal diet + Agariemycetes 0.3%) 및 4) A5(basal diet + Agariemycetes 0.5%)로 4개 처리를 하여 처리당 5반복, 반복당 12수씩 완전 임의 배치하였다. 산란율과 난중은 시험 기간 동안 처리구간 유의적인 차이를 나타나지 않았다. 난각 강도에 있어서는 2주차에 A3와 A5 처리구가 CON구와 비교하여 유의적으로 높게 나타났고(P<0.05), 6주차에 A5 처리구가 CON구보다 유의적으로 높게 나타났다(P<0.05). 난각 두께에 있어서는 2주차에는 생균제 첨가 처리구가 CON구와 비교하여 유의적으로 높게 나타났으며(P<0.05), 4주차에는 A5 처리구가 다른 처리구들과 비교하여 유의적으로 높게 나타났다(P<0.05). 난황색은 2주차에 A5처리구가 CON 구와 비교하여 유의적으로 높았으며(P<0.05), 4주차에는 A3 처리구가 CON 구와 비교하여 유의적으로 낮았다(P<0.05). Haugh unit에 있어서는 2주차에 A3 처리구가 CON 구와 비교하여 유의적으로 높았으며(P<0.05), 6주차에는 모든 Agariemycetes 처리구가 CON구에 비해 유의적으로 높게 나타났다(P<0.05). Ammonia 함량에 있어서는 Agariemycetes 첨가구가 다른 처리구들과 비교하여 유의적으로 낮게 나타났다(P<0.05). $H_2S$ 함량은 Agariemycetes 첨가구가 CON구과 비교하여 유의적으로 낮게 나타났다(P<0.05). Mercaptans 함량에서는 CON구와 A5 처리구가 A3 처리구보다 유의적으로높게 나타났다(P<0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Abdulrahim SM, Haddadin MSY, Hashlamoun EAR, Robinson RK 1996 The influence of Lactobacillus acidophilus and bacitracin on layer performance of chickens and cholesterol content of plasma and egg yolk. Br Poult Sci 37:341-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669608417865
  2. Coates ME, Fuller R 1977 The gnotobiotics animals in the study of gut microbiology. In: Clarke RTJ and BauchopT (Eds.). Microbial Ecology of the Gut. Academic Press, London, pp 311-346.
  3. Conway PL, Kjelleberg S 1989 Protein mediated adhesion of Lactobacillus fermentum strain 737 to mouse stomach squamous epithelium. J Gen Microbiol 135:1175-1186.
  4. Duncan DB 1955 Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  5. Fuller R 1989 Probiotics in man and animals. J Appl Bacteriol 66:365-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb05105.x
  6. Fuller R, Cole CB 1989 The scientific basis of probiotics concept. In probiotics: Theory and applications, BA Stark and JM Wilkinson (Eds.). Proceedings of conference held at the AFRC Institute of Grass Land and Animal Production, Hurley, U.K. 29 November, 1988. p 14.
  7. Goodling AC, Cerniglia GJ, Hebert JA 1987 Production performance of White Leghorn layers fed Lactobacillus fermentation products. Poultry Sci 66:480-486. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0660480
  8. Haddadin M, Abdulrahim SM, Hashlamoun EAR, Robinson RK 1996 The effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the production and chemical composition of hen's eggs. Poultry Sci 75:491-494. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750491
  9. Headson DR, Walsh G 1994 Biological Control of Pollutants Principle of Pig Science. In: Cole, DJA, Wiseman, J and Varley MA(Eds.). Nottingham University Press. pp 375-384.
  10. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Ali MA, Jalaudin S 1998 Effects of adherent Lactobacillus cultures on growth, weight of organs and intestinal microflora and volatile fatty acids in broilers. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 70:197-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00080-1
  11. Lin HC, Visea WJ 1991 Colon mucosal cell damage by ammonia in rats. J Nutr 121:887-893. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/121.6.887
  12. Martin RG, Lyons TP, Jacques KA 1995 Probiotic feeding effect on performance and intestinal microflora of broiler chicks. In biotechnology in the Feed Industry, Proc. 11th Annual Symp Alltech Publ KY U.S.A. p 371.
  13. Mohan B, Kadirvel R, Bhaskaran M, Natarajan A 1995 Effect of probiotic supplementation on serum/yolk cholesterol and on egg shell thickness in layers. Br Poult Sci 36:799-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669508417824
  14. Nahashon SN, Nakaue HS, Mirosh LW 1992 Effect of direct-fed microbials on nutrient retention and productive parameters of laying pullets. Poultry Sci 71 (Suppl.):111 (Abstr.).
  15. Nahashon SN, Nakaue HS, Mirosh LW 1993 Effect of direct- fed microbials on nutrient retention and productive parameters of Single Comb Leghorn pullets. Poultry Sci 72 (Suppl.): 87 (Abstr.).
  16. Nahashon SN, Nakaue HS, Mirosh LW 1994 Phytase activity, phosphorus and calcium retention, and performance of Single Comb White Leghorn layers fed diets containing two levels of available phosphorus and supplemeted with direct-fed microbials. Poult Sci 73:1552-1562. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0731552
  17. Nahashon SN, Nakaue HS, Mirosh LW 1996a Nutrient retention and production parameters of Single White Leghorn layers fed directs with varying crude protein levels and supplemeted with direct-fed microbials. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 61:17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(96)00956-X
  18. Nahashon SN, Nakaue HS, Mirosh LW 1996b Performance of Comb White Leghorn layers fed a diet with a live microbial during the growth and egg laying phases. J Anim Feed Sci Technol 57:25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00852-7
  19. NRC 1998 Nutrient Requirements of Swine. National Research Council, Academy press.
  20. Panda AK, Reddy MR, Rama Rao SV, Praharaj NK 2003 Production performance, serum/yolk cholesterol and immune competence of white Leghorn layer as influenced by dietary supplementation. J Trop Anim Health Prod 35:85-94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022036023325
  21. Rovinson RK 1997 Yogurt and health. Br Nutr Foundation Bull 21:191-194.
  22. Santoso U, Ohtani S, Tanaka K, Sakaida M 1999 Dried Bacillus subtilis culture ammonia gas release in poultry house. Asian- Aus J Anim Sci 12:806. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1999.806
  23. SAS 1996 SAS User’s Guide: Statisics, SAS Inst, Inc., Cary, NC.
  24. Watkins BA, Kratzer FA 1984 Drinking water treatment with commercial preparation of a concentrated Lactobacillus culture for broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 63:1671-1673. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0631671
  25. Wrong OM 1981 Nitrogen compounds In: Wrong OM. Edmonds CJ and Chadwick VS (Eds.) The Large Intestine: Its Role in Mammalian Nitrogen and Homeostasis. John Wiley and Sons. New Yolk. p 133.
  26. 김재황 김영민 김삼철 하홍민 고영두 김창현 2001 복합 생균제의 사료내 첨가가 육계의 생산성 및 계사내 유해 가스 감소에 미치는 영향. 한국동물자원과학회지 43:349-360.
  27. 김찬호 신광석 우경천 백인기 2009 Oligosaccharides 계열 생균제가 산란계의 생산성, 장내 미생물 및 혈청 면역 글로불린 함량에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 36:125-131. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2009.36.2.125
  28. 류경선 박홍석 류명선 박수영 김상호 김상호 송희종 1999 생균제의 급여가 산란계의 생산성과 장내 미생물의 변화에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 26:253-259.
  29. 윤지연 김재영 김지숙 이보근 안병기 황용배 강성기 김동건 강창원 2008 생균제 및 Colistin 복합 첨가제의 급여가 산란계의 생산성과 계란의 품질에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 35:153-162. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2008.35.2.153
  30. 홍종욱 김인호 권오석 한영근 이상환 2002 산란계에 있어 생균제의 첨가가 계란 품질 및 배설물내 유해 가스 함량에 미치는 영향. 한국동물자원과학회지 44:213-220.
  31. 東江幸信 1998 アガリエ菌が地球を救ら. ビヅネス社. 東京, 日本.

Cited by

  1. Effects of Dietary Effective Microorganism (EM) on Growth Performance, Microflora Population and Noxious Gas Emission in Broiler vol.41, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2014.41.4.227
  2. Effects of Bacillus subtilis on Growth Performance and Resistance to Salmonella Infection in Broiler Chickens vol.40, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2013.40.3.277