The actual condition of operating dental hygiene curriculum between Korea and America

한국과 미국의 치위생학과 교육과정 운영실태

  • Received : 2010.11.08
  • Accepted : 2010.12.18
  • Published : 2010.12.30

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of this study is to train talents with high quality in dental hygienists by suggesting problems and proposing basic data available for applying to development in dental hygiene curriculum, through analyzing contents of dental hygiene curriculum. Methods : To analyze curriculum of educational institutions for dental hygienists between America and Korea, it utilized materials that were notified on each university homepage, analyzed documents, analyzed curricular content analysis, comparatively analyzed America's ASDHEP field, and comparatively analyzed Biomedical Science field, dentistry field, prevention and public field, clinical dental hygiene field, integrated curriculum, and teaching course between domestic university and American university. Results : 1. The basic field of ASDHEP was indicated the average credit in 28.6 for 4-year university with establishment and the average credit in 26.9 for 3-year university with establishment. The curricular subject field of ASDHEP except the basic field was indicated the average credit in 29.45 for 4-year university with establishment and the average credit in 30.68 for 3-year university with establishment. The prevention and public field by university was indicated the totally average credit in 27.5 for 4-year university and in 26.2 for 3-year university. The clinical dental hygiene field by university was indicated the totally average credit in 27.5 for 4-year university and in 35.0 for 3-year university. The integrated curriculum was indicated to be established dental hygiene practice(3 universities), dental clinics practice for Dept. of clinical dental hygiene(2 universities), and comprehensive dental hygiene practice(1 university) for 4-year university, and to be established clinical dental hygiene(2 universities), comprehensive dental hygiene practice, dental hygiene practice, and dental clinics practice(1 university, respectively) for 3-year university. Comparing the teaching courses by university, they were established diversely from 8 credits to 2 credits. Conclusions : Seeing the above findings, a plan for dental hygiene curriculum needs to be continuously developed so that dental hygienists can enter upon a professional career. Development in the international standard curriculum proper for global era is considered to be desperately needed.

Keywords

References

  1. 김응권, 김영진, 김창희 외 7인. 치위생학의 교육표준화 및 발전방향. 대한치과위생사협회, 대한치위생과 교수협의회. 2005.
  2. 강경희, 권홍민, 김동열 외 36인. 치면세마론. 서울 : 청구문화사; 2010:18.
  3. Commission on Dental Accreditation. Accreditation standards for Dental Hygiene Education Programs. 2009;17-21.
  4. 황미영, 김영남, 김영선 외 7인. 치위생교육 인정평가 기준 연구. 대한치과위생사협, 대한치위생(학)과 교수협의회. 2007.
  5. 권현숙. 현행전문대학 치위생과 교육과정의 분석[석사학위논문]. 창원: 경남대학교 대학원; 1995.
  6. Harden. The integration ladder. Medical Education. 2000;551-557.
  7. Jacobs, Interdisciplinary Curriculum Design and Implementation. ASED:1989.
  8. Drake. Planning Integrated Curriculum. Va. ASCD:1993.
  9. 정원균, 김응권, 최은미 외 6인. 우리나라 치위생학 학문체계의 발전 방향에 관한 연구. 대한치과위생사협회, 대한치위생(학)과 교수협의회. 2009.
  10. ADEA(American Dental Education Association). Compendium of Curriculum Guidelines. Allied Dental Education programs. 2005;10-20.
  11. 김숙향, 오정숙, 정순희 외 9인. 임상치위생학. 서울: 대한나래출판사; 2007:3-14.
  12. 황미영, 이춘선. 치과위생사 통합교육과정 모형 접근에 관한 연구. 한국치위생교육학회지 2007;7(4):595-605.
  13. 김인숙, 원복연, 이영옥 외 4인. 치위생과 국제표준 교육과정 개발. 서울: 교육인적자원부; 2007.
  14. 이영옥, 원복연, 김인숙, 정순희. 전문대학 치위생과 교육연한 연장에 관한 연구. 대전보건대학 논문집; 1991.