Protein Patterns on a Corpus Luteum during Pregnancy in Korean Native Cows

  • Chung, Hak-Jae (Molecular Animal Reproduction Lab, Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • You, Dong-Min (Molecular Animal Reproduction Lab, Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Hyo-Ju (Molecular Animal Reproduction Lab, Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Hye-Young (Molecular Animal Reproduction Lab, Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Myeong-Suk (Molecular Animal Reproduction Lab, Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Bum (Molecular Animal Reproduction Lab, Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Suck-Dong (Molecular Animal Reproduction Lab, Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Park, Jung-Yong (Molecular Animal Reproduction Lab, Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Myeung-Sik (Molecular Animal Reproduction Lab, Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
  • Received : 2010.09.15
  • Accepted : 2010.09.20
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

Luteal cells produce progesterone that supports pregnancy. Steroidogenesis requires coordination of the anabolic and catabolic pathways of lipid metabolism. In the present study, the corpus luteum (CL) in early pregnancy established from luteal phase and pregnant phase was analyzed. The first study determined progesterone changes in the bovine CL at day 19 (early maternal recognition period) and day 90 in mid-pregnancy and compared them to the CL from day 12 of the estrous cycle. CL alternation was tested using two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). Comparing CL from luteal phase to those from pregnant phase counterparts, significant changes in expression level were found in 23 proteins. Of these proteins 17 were not expressed in pregnant phase CL but expressed in luteal phase counterpart, whereas, the expression of the other 6 proteins was limited only in pregnant phase CL. Among these proteins, vimentin is considered to be involved in regulation of post-implantation development. In particular, vimentin may be used as marker for CL development during pregnancy because the expression level changed considerably in pregnant phase CL tissue compared with its luteal phase counterpart. Data from 2-DE suggest that protein expression was disorientated in mid pregnancy from luteal phase, but these changes was regulated with progression of pregnancy. These findings demonstrate CL development during mid-pregnancy from luteal phase and suggest that alternations of specific CL protein expression may be involved in maintenance of pregnancy.

Keywords

References

  1. Axelson M, Schumacher G, Sjovall J, Gustafsson B, Lindell JO (1975): Identification and quantitative determination of steroids in bovine corpus luteum during oestrous cycle and pregnancy. Acta Endocr Copenh 80:149-164.
  2. Bersinger NA, Bikhauser MH, Yared M, Wunder DM (2009): Serum glycodelin pattern during the menstrual cycle in healthy young women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88:1215-1221. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016340903294264
  3. Bott RC, Ashley RL, Henkes LE, Antoniazzi AQ, Bruemmer JE, Niswender GD, Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Smirnova NP, Anthony RV, Hansen TR (2010): Uterine vein infusion of interferon tau (ITNF) extends luteal life span in ewe. Biol Reprod 82:725-735. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.079467
  4. Bradford MM (1976): A repad and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
  5. Campbell BK, Kendall NR, Baird DT (2009): Effect of direct infusion of bone morphogenetic protein 6(BMP6) on ovarian function in sheep. Biol Reprod 81: 1016-1023. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.076653
  6. Chagas e SJ, Lopes de CJ (2005): Luteotrophic influence of early bovine embryos and the relationship between plasma progesterone concentrations and embryo survival. Theriogenology 64:49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.10.019
  7. Channing CP, Schaerf FW, Anderson LD, Tsafriri A (1980): Ovarian follicular and luteal physiology. Int Rev Physiol 22:117-201.
  8. Chowdhury MW, Scaramuzzi RJ, Wheeler-Jones CP, Khalid M (2010): The expression of angiogenic growth factors and their receptors in ovarian follicles throughout the estrous cycle in the ewe. Theriogenology 73:856-872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.10.011
  9. Couet J, Martel C, Dupont E, Luu-The V, Sirard MA, Zhao H-E, Pelletier G, Labrie F (1990): Changes in 3$\beta$-hydroxysteroid dehydroxygenase/$\Delta^5$ - $\Delta^4$ isomerase mRNA, activity and protein levels during the estrous cycle in the bovine ovary. Endocrinology 127:2141-2148. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-127-5-2141
  10. Dickinson RE, Stewart AJ, Myers M, Millar RP, Duncan WC (2009): Differential expression and functional characterization of luteinzing hormone receptor splice variants in human luteal cells: implications for luteolysis. Endocrinology 150:2873-2881. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2008-1382
  11. Dohmen RJ (2004): SUMO protein modification. Biochem Biophys Acta 1695:113-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.09.021
  12. Erb RE, Estergreen VL, Gomes WR, Plotka ED, Frost OL (1968): Progestin levels in corpora lutea and progesterone in ovarian venous jugular vein blood plasma of the pregnant bovine. J Dairy Sci 51:401-410. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(68)86998-X
  13. Fenyves AM, Behrens J, Spanel-Borowski K (1993): Cultured microvascular endothelial cells (MVEC) differ in cytoskeleton expression of cadherins and fibronectin matrix: A study under influence of interferon-$\gamma$. J Cell Sci 106:879-890.
  14. Hirsch PJ, Fergusson IL, King RJ (1977): Protein composition of human endometrium and its secretion at different stages of the menstrual cycle. Ann N Acad Sci 11:286-248.
  15. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S (2002): RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419:135-141. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00991
  16. Ireland JJ, Muephee RL, Coulson PB (1980): Accuracy of predicting stages of bovine estrous cycle by gross appearance of the corpus luteum. J Dairy Sci 63:155-160. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82901-8
  17. KcCord JM, Fridovich I (1969): Superoxide dismutase: an enzymic function for erythrocuprein (Hemocuprein). J Biol Chem 244:6049-6055.
  18. Li X-M, Juorio AV, Murphy BD (1993): Prostaglandins alter the aboundance of messenger ribonucleic acid for steroidogenic enzymes in cultured porcine granulose cells. Biol Reprod 48:1360-1366. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod48.6.1360
  19. Melchior F (2000): SUMO-nonclassical ubiquitin. Annu Rev Cell Biol 16:591-626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.591
  20. Nacerddine K, Lehembre F, Bhaumik M, Artus J, Cohen-Tannoudji M, Babinet C, Pandolfi PP, Dejean A (2005): The SUMO pathway is essential for nuclear integrity and chromosome segregation in mice. Dev Cell 9:769-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.10.007
  21. Nelson PS, Han D, Rochon Y, Corthals GL, Lin B, Monson A, Nguyen V, Franza BR, Olymate SR, Aebersold R, Hood L (2000): Comprehensive analyses of prostate gene expression: convergence of expressed sequence tag database, transcript profiling and subsequent development. Electrophoresis 21:2235-2242. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2683(20000601)21:11<2235::AID-ELPS2235>3.0.CO;2-A
  22. Niswender GD, Nett TM (1994): Corpus luteum and its control in infraprimate species. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction. 2nd ed, New York: Raven Press pp 781-816.
  23. Niswender GD, Juengel IL, Silva PJ, Rollyson MK, McIntush EW (2000): Mechanisms controlling the function and lifespan of the corpus luteum. Physiol Rev 80:1-29.
  24. Osnes T, Sandstad O, Skar V, Osnes M, Kierulf P (1993): Total protein in common dust bile measured by acetonitrile precipitation and a micro bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 53:757-763. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365519309092582
  25. Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Sacher M, Hoege C, Jentsch S (2005): SUMO modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436:428-433.
  26. Rajan S, Plant LD, Rabin ML, Butler MH, Goldstein SA (2005): Sumoylation silences the plasma membrane leak $K^+$ channel K2P 1. Cell 121:37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.019
  27. Rodgers RJ, Waterman MR, Simpson ER (1986): Cytochrome P-450sec, $P-450_{17\alpha}$, adrenodoxin, and reduced in bovine follicles and corpora lutea. Changes in specific contents during the ovarian cycle. Endocrinology 118:1366-1374. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-118-4-1366
  28. Rodgers RJ, Waterman MR, Simpson ER (1987): Levels of messenger RNA encoding cholesterol sidechain cleavage cytochrome P-450, 17 $\alpha$-hydroxylase cytochrome P450, adrenodoxin and low density lipoprotein receptor in bovine follicles and corpora lutea throughout the ovarian cycle. Mol Endocrinol 1:274-279. https://doi.org/10.1210/mend-1-3-274
  29. Ross S, Best JL, Zon LI, Gill G (2002): SUMO-1 modification represses Sp3 transcriptional activation and modulates its subnuclear localization. Mol Cell 10:831-842. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00682-2
  30. Sapetschnig A, Rischitor G, Braun H, Doll A, Schergaut M, Melchior F, Suske G (2002): Transcription factor Sp3 is silenced through SUMO modification by PIAS 1. EMBO J 21:5206-5215. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdf510
  31. Schwartz DC, Hochstasser M (2003): A superfamily of protein tags: SUMO and related modifiers. Trends Biochem Sci 28:321-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00113-0
  32. Shiki Y, Meyrick BO, Brigham KL, Burr IM (1987):Endotoxin increase superoxide dismutase in cultured bovine pulmonary endothelial cells. Am J Physiol 252:C436-440.
  33. Souza PC, de Katz SG (2003): Coexpression of cytokeratin and vimentin in mice trophoblastic giant cells. Tissue & Cell 33:40-45.
  34. Stade K. Vogel F, Schwienhorst I, Meusser B, Volkwein C, Nentwig B, Dohmen RJ, Sommer T (2002): A lack of SUMO conjugation affects cNLS-dependent nuclear protein import in yeast. J Biol Chem 277:49554-49561. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M207991200
  35. Tian XC, Berndtson AK, Fortune JE (1994): Changes in levels of messenger ribonucleic acid for cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage and 3$\beta$ -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase during prostaglandin $F_2\alpha$-induced luteolysis in cattle. Biol Reprod 50:349-356. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod50.2.349
  36. Veenhuizen EL, Wagner JF, Tonkinson LV (1972) Corpus luteum response to 6-chloro $\Delta6$-17 acetoxyprogesterone and hCG in the cow. Biol Reprod 6:270-276.
  37. Vicovac L, Aplin JD (1996): Epithelial-mesenchymal transition during trophoblast differentiation. Acta Anat 156:202-216. https://doi.org/10.1159/000147847