DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Survey on the Housewives' Purchasing Behavior and Needs for Food Safety Information

주부들의 식품안전 관련 구매행동 및 정보요구도 조사

  • Published : 2010.03.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate housewives' purchase behavior and needs for information on food safety. The data were collected from 275 housewives over the age of 20 living in Seoul and metropolitan areas from March 9 to April 3 in 2009. The result of this study showed that 'checking expiration date' topped with 4.59 in the purchase behavior for food safety followed by 'buying domestics' (4.08) and 'considering food safety' (3.66). The study also showed that only 18.5% of the respondents said that they have an experience of education for food safety, and 'environmental hormones' was the highest with 89.1% in the percentage of correct answer but 'mad cow disease' was the lowest with 25.8%. Also total degree of knowledge for food hazards was an average of 8.56 out of 13. The respondents' degree of information search for food safety was generally low at 2.61 and tv/radio topped the list of information sources with 4.04, followed by newspaper/magazine (3.80), internet (3.44), and family/relatives/friends (3.39). Finally, degree of information needs for food safety was generally high with 3.82. Therefore, government, producers, distributers and academic researchers must provide consumers collective and sufficient information about the food safety and hazards through the diverse information sources. Also they have to play their respective roles in developing and executing feasible education program for consumers.

본 연구는 주부들의 식품안전과 관련한 식품구매행동과 식품안전에 대한 정보요구도를 조사하기 위하여 수행되었다. 연구를 위한 자료는 서울 및 수도권 지역 거주 만 20세 이상의 주부를 대상으로 2009년 3월 9일부터 4월 3일까지 수집되었다. 결과를 요약하면 첫째, 식품안전 관련 구매행동에서 '유통기한을 확인'한다는 응답이 4.59로 가장 높았고, '국내산 구입'(4.08), '가격보다 안전을 고려'(3.66) 등이 다음으로 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 식품안전에 관한 교육 경험이 있다고 응답한 사람은 18.5%에 그쳤는데, 식품안전 위해요소에 관한 항목별 지식수준에 있어 '환경호르몬' 항목은 정답률이 89.1%로 가장 높았고 '광우병' 항목은 25.8%로 가장 낮았으며, 전체 지식수준은 총 13점 만점에 평균 8.56점으로 그다지 높지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 식품안전에 관한 정보탐색도는 2.61로 낮게 나타났는데, 식품안전에 관한 정보원천으로는 TV/라디오가 4.04로 가장 높았고 신문/잡지(3.80), 인터넷(3.44), 가족/친지/친구(3.39) 등이 다음으로 높게 나타났다. 넷째, 식품안전에 관한 정보요구도는 3.82로 높게 나타나 평소 식품안전에 관한 정보를 많이 필요로 하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 정부, 제조업자, 가공 및 유통업자 등은 식품안전 및 식품위해요소들에 관한 정확하고 충분한 정보를 다양한 정보원을 통해 제공해야 하며 또한 각종 교육프로그램을 개발 및 운영하여야 한다. 이를 통해, 보다 적극적인 소비자들의 정보탐색 활동을 유도하고 식품안전관련 지식수준을 향상시켜 나감으로써, 궁극적으로 소비자들의 안전을 고려한 올바른 식품구매행동을 유도해 나가야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang DK, Park HJ. 2006. Analysis for consumers food purchase behavior with respect to agrifood safety. Korean J Agric Manag & Pol 33: 563-582.
  2. Nam HJ, Kim YS. 2006. A Survey on perceived food safety in urban residents. Korean J Food & Nutr 19: 126-142.
  3. Bang BH, Kim JK, Yoon WH, Lee GR, Choe GY, Hwang SY, Hwang CH. 2009. Food hygiene. Jin Ro Publishing Co., Seoul, Korea. p 14-23.
  4. Roberts T, Smallwood D. 1991. Data needs to address economic issues in food safety. Am J Agric Econ 73: 933-942. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242857
  5. Yi JY. 2004. Die sicherheit des lebensmittes und die grenzen der regulierung von lebensmittes. Chung-ang Law Review 6: 33-57.
  6. Yi JY. 2005. Zur sicherheit des lebensmittes im erneuerten lebensmittelrecht. Chung-ang Law Review 7: 41-61.
  7. Lee WY. 1997. A study on consumers' behavior relative to food's safety. MS Thesis. Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.
  8. Lee GB. 1996. Women consumer perceptions and attitudes of food safety and the factors related to safety concern. MS Thesis. Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  9. Han YS. 1995. A study on the recognition of housewives about safety of food additives. MS Thesis. Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.
  10. Park HY, Kim SW. 2005. A study on consumers' information demand of genetically modified organisms (GMO). J Korean Home Econ 43: 175-189.
  11. Kim HC, Kim MR. 2002. Analysis of the consumers' awareness and information need for food safety: focused on irradiated foods and environmental hormones. Korean J Dietary Culture 17: 153-164.
  12. Choe JS, Chun HK, Hwang DY, Nam HJ. 2005. Consumer perceptions of food-related hazards and correlates of degree of concerns about food. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 34: 66-74. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2005.34.1.066
  13. Kim HC, Kim MR. 2003. Consumers' awareness and information needs towards food hygiene (I): focused on pesticide residues. J Korean Home Econ 41: 15-26.
  14. Kim HC, Kim MR. 2003. Consumers' awareness and information-seeking behaviors towards food hygiene (2): focused on foodborne illness. J Korean Home Econ 41: 117-128.
  15. Lee EH, Rhee KC. 1991. A study on consumers information needs and the related factors. J Korean Home Econ 29: 159-176.
  16. Park JY, Choi EH, Choi JH, Shim SK, Park HS, Park KH, Moon HK, Ryu K. 2009. Assessment of consumer's food safety perception and practices. J Fd Hyg Safety 24: 1-11.
  17. Lee SR. 1992. Safety assurance in dietary scheme. Proceedings of the Korean Home Economics Association Fall Meeting. p 21-39.
  18. Kim HS. 1998. Farmers' attitude and perception on the food safety. Suwon University Nonmunjib 16: 217-227.
  19. Kim HC, Kim MR. 2004. Consumers' information search behavior for food safety. Injenonchong 19: 1-8.
  20. Kim HC, Kim MR. 2009. consumers' awareness of the risk elements associated with foods and information search behavior regarding food safety. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 19: 116-129.

Cited by

  1. Development of Safe Food Handling Guidelines for Korean Consumers vol.78, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-506
  2. A Study on Risk Perception Characteristics for Food Risk Elements ofUniversity Students in Yeungnam Region vol.27, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2017.8.27.4.450
  3. Development of an Educational App for Safe Dietary Life based on Elementary School Parents' Perceptions on Pesticide Residue vol.29, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2013.29.2.161
  4. Consumers Perceptions on Sodium Saccharin in Social Media vol.30, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2015.30.4.329
  5. Establishment of quality criteria and estimate of shelf-life for yogurt beverage and stirred-type yogurt in Korea vol.22, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-013-0104-y
  6. Investigation of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior for Analyzing Food Safety Risk Factors in the Elderly vol.45, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2016.45.5.746
  7. Comparative Analysis on the Perceptions for Food Additives Between Elementary School Teachers and Nutrition Teachers vol.31, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2016.31.2.74
  8. Consumers Perceptions on Monosodium L-glutamate in Social Media vol.31, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2016.31.3.153
  9. Perception Gaps on Food Additives among Various Groups in Korea: Food Experts, Teachers, Nutrition Teachers, Nongovernmental Organization Members, and General Consumers vol.80, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-340
  10. Determination of Shelf Life for Butter and Cheese Products in Actual and Accelerated Conditions vol.34, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.2.245
  11. Analysis on the Factors Influencing Risk Perception and Risk Taking Behavior to Japanese Fishery Products: Focused on Affect Factor vol.31, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2016.31.3.167
  12. Study of University Students’ Perception of Food Safety and Food Purchasing Behavior vol.29, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2018.29.2.247
  13. Perception and importance for country-of-origin labeling at restaurants in college students in Jeju vol.51, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2018.51.2.177
  14. Awareness of Adulterated Food and Its Management Beliefs and Capabilities among Teenagers' Parents vol.24, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2018.24.2.004
  15. 식품안전 인지도와 식품안전 관련 구매행동 조사 vol.24, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2018.24.3.009
  16. Structural Equation Model of Dietary Style and Dietary Guidelines for Pregnant Women vol.29, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2019.2.29.1.1
  17. 전북지역 어머니의 지속가능 식생활유형에 따른 영유아 자녀의 간식관리 및 간식제품에 대한 요구도 조사 vol.53, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.1.39