Health Policy and Management (보건행정학회지)

Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management (한국보건행정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Related to Fundus Examination in Diabetes Mellitus Patients

당뇨병환자 안저검사 수검 요인

  • Published : 2010.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze the proportion of fundus examination of DM patients for preventing microvascular complication and to examine the factors related to fundus examination in DM patients. Methods: This study used 2005 Korean national health and nutrition survey data. We selected all 1,129 diabetes mellitus patients from the data. And we choose 8 factors related to diabetes mellitus patients. These are sex, age group, type of residential area(rural or urban), education level, income level, comorbidity with hypertension, current insulin use, and duration of suffering from DM. We have analysed these factors by whether he had been examined fundus or no through Chi-square and logistic regression analysis. Results: Female DM patients have tendency to get more fundus examination than Male DM patients. And Young patients, patients who live in urban area, well educated patients, high income patients, comorbidity with hypertension, patients have got the insulin injection, patients have long duration of suffering from DM are to get more fundus examination. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, sex and education level, income level, and duration of suffering from DM, comorbidity with hypertension, patients have got the insulin injection are significant factors on fundus examination for prevent microvascular diabetes mellitus complications. Conclusions and Discussion: We have concluded that physicians and policy makers should consider to fundus examination especially of man and DM patients who have more shorter disease period and low educated patients and low incomed patients and patients who have taken insulin therapy.

Keywords

References

  1. 김경식, 최춘호, 이도영. 한국 농촌에 사는 당뇨병 환자의 역학적 연구. 대한 당뇨병학회지 1972 ; 1 : 17-24
  2. 김병준, 우정택, 김성운, 양인명, 김진우, 김영설, 최영길. 당뇨병 환자에서의 사망원인에 대한 고찰. 경희의학 1997 ; 13(4) : 358-365
  3. 김응진. 당뇨병학. 서울 일조각 1976 ; 127-137 : S4-36
  4. 김현창. 국민건강조사자료의 특성과 활용 전략. 대한예방의학회 동계심포지엄 연제집. 서울 ; 대한예방의학회 ; 2007
  5. 신병권, 김광수. 안과를 처음 방문한 당뇨환자의 안저소견에 대한 고찰. 대한안과학회지 2002 ; 43 : 2158-2165
  6. 심삼도 김시열 30세이후 진단된 당뇨병 환자에서 첫 안저검사와 당뇨 망막증의 정도. 대한 안과학회지 1999 ; 2 : 198-204
  7. 이재흥, 정인희, 장광. 당뇨병성 망막증의 임상분석. 대한안과학회지 1981 ; 22(3) : 707-714
  8. 이지은, 박현아. 한국인 성인의 당뇨병 어떻게 관리되고 있을까?-미국당뇨병학회의 권고 목표치를 기준으로. 대한가정의학회지 2008 ; 29 : 658-667
  9. 임승정, 권오웅, 김홍복. 당뇨병 병형에 따른 당뇨병성 망막증의 임상분석. 대한안과학회지 1986 ; 27(6) : 1045-1051
  10. 진경현 외 역(Jack J. Kanski). 임상안과학(Clinical ophthalmology). 정담출판사 ; 2005, 455쪽
  11. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005 ; 28 : S4-36 https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.suppl_1.S4
  12. Bek T, Lund-Andersen H, Hansen AB, Johnsen KB, Sandbaek A, Lauritzen T. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in patients with screen-detected type 2 diabetes in Denmark : the ADDITION study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep 12 [Epub ahead of print]
  13. Dornan T Mann Ji, Turner R. Factor protective against retinopathy in insulin-dependent diabetes free of retinopathy for 30 years. Br Med J 1982 ; 285 : 1073-1077 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.285.6348.1073
  14. Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, et al. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetes retinopathy.III. Prevalence and risk of diabetes retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Opthalmol. 1984 ; 102 : 527-532 https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030405011
  15. Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE. A population-based study of diabetic retinopathy in insulin-using patients diagnosed before 30 years of age, Diabetes care 1985;8(supple):71-76 https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.8.1.S71
  16. Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE, Gangnon R, Klein BE. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy : XXII the twenty-five-year progression of retinopathy in persons with type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology 2008 ; 115(11) : 1857-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.023
  17. OECD. OECD Health Data 2009-Frequently Requested Data. Available from：URL： http://www.oecd.org/document/16/0,2340,en_2825_495642_2085200_1_1_1_1,00.html
  18. Orchard TJ, Forrest K, Ellis D, Baker DJ. Cumulative glycemic exposure and microvascular complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 1997 ; 157 : 1851-1856 https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.157.16.1851
  19. Palmberg PF. Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes 1997 ; 26 : 703-709
  20. Weiner JP, Parente ST, Garnick DW, Fowles J, Lawthers AG Palmer RH. Variation in office-based quality. A claims-baed profile of care provided to medicare patients with diabetes. JAMA 1995 ; 273(19) ; 1503-1508 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.273.19.1503
  21. Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Shaw J. Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature 2001 ; 414 : 782-787 https://doi.org/10.1038/414782a

Cited by

  1. The Associated Factors with Utilization of Tests for Diabetes Complication and Hemoglobin A1c among Some Diabetes Patients vol.26, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2016.26.2.207
  2. Regional disparity of medical resources and its effect on age-standardized mortality rates in Korea pp.1432-0592, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-019-00897-z