The Effects of Myofascial Relaxation on Blood Flow Velocity of the Cranial Artery and Pain Level in Cervicogenic Headache Patients

근막이완술이 경추성 두통환자의 뇌혈류와 통증수준에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Joon-Hee (Department of Physical Therapy, School of Public Health, Daebul University) ;
  • Kang, Da-Haeng (Department of Physical Therapy, School of Public Health, Daebul University) ;
  • Kang, Jeong-Il (Department of Physical Therapy, School of Public Health, Daebul University)
  • 이준희 (대불대학교 보건대학원 물리치료학과) ;
  • 강다행 (대불대학교 보건대학원 물리치료학과) ;
  • 강정일 (대불대학교 보건대학원 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2010.07.14
  • Accepted : 2010.09.19
  • Published : 2010.10.25

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate a possible role for cranial artery velocity in cervicogenic headache. Methods: We studied 13 patients with cervicogenic headaches (M=9, F=4, age=$24.50{\pm}3.50\;y$) these were compared to 20 normal subjects (M=10, F=10, age=$23.30{\pm}2.90\;y$). Cervicogenic headache patients were divided into two groups (a myofascial relaxation group, a placebo group). Pain levels were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound recordings were used to measure blood flow velocity in the cranial artery. Results: Cervicogenic headache patients exhibited a significantly lower blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery. The patients who received an intervention had a significantly higher blood flow velocity in the left middle cerebral artery, right vertebral artery and basilar artery. Compared to the placebo group, the myofascial relaxation group exhibited a significantly decreased level of pain. Conclusion: Cervicogenic headache is pain referred to the head from a source in the cervical spine. Manual therapy affect to cervical spine and soft tissue as well as the passage of these vessels and nerves to recover because it is thought to be able to help.

Keywords

References

  1. Jensen R. The tension-type headache alternative. Peripheral pathophysiological mechanisms. Cephalalgia. 1999;19(Suppl 25):9-10.
  2. Henry P, Dartigues JF, Puymirat C et al. The association cervicalgia-headaches: an epidemiologic study. Cephalalgia. 1987;7(Suppl 6):189-90.
  3. Nilsson N. The prevalence of cervicogenic headache in a random population sample of 20 to 59year olds. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(17):1884-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199509000-00008
  4. Kelman L. Migraine changes with age: IMPACT on migraine classification. Headache 2006;46(7):1161-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00444.x
  5. Bogduk N. Cervicogenic headache: anatomic basis and pathophysiologic mechanisms. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2005;5(4):382-6.
  6. Haldeman S, Dagenais S. Cervicogenic headaches: a critical review. Spine J. 2001;1(1):31-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00024-9
  7. Pollmann W, Keidel M, Pfaffenrath V. Headache and the cervical spine: a critical review. Cephalalgia. 1997;17(8): 801-16. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1997.1708801.x
  8. van Duijn J, van Duijn AJ, Nitsch W. Orthopaedic manual physical therapy including thrust manipulation and exercise in the management of a patient with cervicogenic headache: a case report. J Man Manip Ther. 2007;15(1):10-24. https://doi.org/10.1179/106698107791090114
  9. LeBauer A, Brtalik R, Stowe K. The effect of myofascial release (MFR) on an adult with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2008;12(4):356-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.03.008
  10. Bronfort G, Evans R, Nelson B et al. A randomized clinical trial of exercise and spinal manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(7):788-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200104010-00020
  11. Evans R, Bronfort G, Nelson B et al. Two-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of spinal manipulation and two types of exercise for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(21):2383-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200211010-00013
  12. Martínez-Segura R, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Ruiz-Sáez M et al. Immediate effects on neck pain and active range of motion after a single cervical high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29(7):511-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.06.022
  13. Hong SN, Kim BG, Ku JS et al. Clinical correlation of abnormal transcranial doppler in migraineurs. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2000;18(6):711-5.
  14. Chung CS, Lee KH. Subtype-specific hemodynamic changes in headache-free migraineurs: a transcranial doppler (TCD) ultrasonographic study. Headache. 1996;36(4):263-4.
  15. Wallasch TM. Transcranial doppler ultrasonic features in chronic tension-type headache. Cephalalgia. 1992;12(6): 385-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.1992.00385.x
  16. Park RJ, Kim JS, Lee IH et al. Effecs of electrotherapy on blood velocity of cranial artery in tension-type headache subjects. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2000;12(3):349-59.
  17. Han JM, Kim JS. The effects of ultrasound and myofascial release therapy on blood velocity of cranial artery in tension-type headache subjects. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2003;15(1):196-209.
  18. Lee MH, Han JM. Cerebral blood flow velocity measurement by TCD: the effects of interferential current. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2005;17(2):126-47.
  19. Sjaastad O, Fredriksen TA, Pfaffenrath V. Cervicogenic headache: diagnostic criteria. The Cervicogenic Headache International Study Group. Headache. 1998;38(6):442-5 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3806442.x
  20. Digiovanna EL, Schiowitz S, Dowling DJ. An osteopathic approach to diagnosis and treatment. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004:141,613.
  21. Aparicio EQ, Quirante LB, Blanco CR et al. Immediate effects of the suboccipital muscle inhibition technique in subjects with short hamstring syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32(4):262-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.03.006
  22. Jull G. Management of cervical headache. Man Ther. 1997;2(4)182-90. https://doi.org/10.1054/math.1997.0298
  23. Lee YS, Kim BK. Application of transcranial doppler ultrasonography for the diagnosis of migraine: preliminary results. Journal of the Korean Society Clinical Neurophysiology. 1999;1(1):31-8.
  24. Choi SC, Kwon HY, Kim TU et al. Cerebral blood flow velocityof young people in their twenties. J Exp Biomed Sci. 2004;10(4):467-72.
  25. Hou CR, Tsai LC, Cheng KF et al. Immediate effects of various physical therapeutic modalities on cervical myofascial pain and trigger-point sensitivity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(10):1406-14. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.34834
  26. Kim GW, Sohn YH, Lee JH et al. The reference values and influenceing factors of TCD meansurements in 200 normal Korean adults. J Kor Neurosurg Soc. 1995;13:1-10.
  27. van Suijlekom JA., Weber WEJ, van Kleef M. Cervicogenic headache: Techniques of diagnostic nerve blocks. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 200018(suppl.19): S39-S44.
  28. Margo CE. The Placebo Effect. SURV OPHTHALMOL. 19991(8):31-44.
  29. Kim KT, Song CW. Comparison therapeutic effect of C2 ganglion block for cervicogenic headache, tension-type headache, and migraine without aura. Korean J Anesthesiol. 1997;32(6):990-5.
  30. Kim SS, Park BS, Lee YJ. The effect of intramuscular stimulation( IMS) in cervicogenic headache. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2006;50(3)355-60.