Semen Quality of the Black Bengal Bucks Used at Commercial Artificial Insemination

  • 투고 : 2010.09.22
  • 심사 : 2010.10.05
  • 발행 : 2010.12.31

초록

Only an optimum number of viable spermatozoa in a frozen-thawed insemination dose can ensure conception at artificial insemination (AI). We report here the percentages of normal, abnormal and viable spermatozoa present in the frozen-thawed semen of 20 Black Bengal bucks used for commercial AI. Bucks in this experiment were of 19.3~46.1 months old and 25~42 kg body weight. Four semen straws (0.25 ml) from each buck were collected for evaluation of their kinetic parameters. Scrotal circumference was measured by using a scrotal tape, sperm motility was estimated on eye estimation and sperm concentration was determined by using a haemocytometer. Sperm morphology was studied in paraformaldehyde fixed spermatozoa under differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope. To determine the proportion of live (plasma membrane intact) spermatozoa, semen was stained with SYBR-14 and propidium iodide and examined under fluorescent microscope. Scrotal circumference, post-thaw sperm motility, sperm concentration per insemination dose and proportion of normal spermatozoa were $21.5{\pm}0.7\;cm$, $43.5 {\pm}5.4%$, $83.5{\pm}6.7$ million and $88.3{\pm}4.1%$, respectively. The percentages of spermatozoa with head shape and acrosome abnormalities were lower ($2.7{\pm}1.1$ and $1.4{\pm}1.3$, respectively), whereas higher percentages of abnormalities ($7.0{\pm}1.8$) were observed in mid piece and tail portion. The proportion of live spermatozoa was $28.5{\pm}5.4$. It is concluded that although a good number of morphologically normal spermatozoa are present in the insemination dose, the proportion of live spermatozoa is low, which warrants further improvements of buck semen freezing procedures to ensure good quality at AI.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aboagla E.M.-E and Terada T. 2004. Effects of egg yolk during the freezing step of cryopreservation on the viability of goat spermatozoa. Theriogenology 62:1160-1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.01.013
  2. Ball L, Ott RS, Mortimer RG and Simons JC. 1983. Manual for breeding soundness examination of bulls. J. Soc. Theriogenology 12:1-65.
  3. Bane A. 1952. A study on the technique of hemocytometric determination of sperm motility and sperm concentration in bull semen. The Corn. Veteri. 42:518-531.
  4. Barth AD, Brown PA, Gabriel AB and Mapletoft RJ. 1992. Effect of narrow sperm head on fertility in cattle. Canad. Vet. J. 33:31-39.
  5. Bhuiyan MMU. 1998. The quality of bull semen used in artificial insemination in Bangladesh. MSc. Thesis, Department of Surgery and Obstetrics, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh.
  6. Bjorndahl L, Soderlund I, Johansson S, Mohammadieh M, Pourian MR and Kvist U. 2004. Why the WHO recommendations for eosin-nigrosin staining techniques for human sperm vitality assessment must change? J. Androl. 25:671-678.
  7. Brito LF, Barth AD, Biludeau-Goeseels S, Panich PL and Kastelic JP. 2003. Comparison of methods to evaluate the plasmalemma of bovine sperm and their relationship with in vitro fertilization rate. Theriogenology 60:1539-1551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00174-2
  8. Chandler JE, Painter CL, Adkinson RW, Memon MA and Hoyt PG. 1988. Semen quality characteristics of dairy goats. J. D. Sci. 71:1638-1646. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79728-3
  9. De Vos, K 2006. http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/plugins/cell-counter.html
  10. Evans G and Maxwell CW. 1990. Manejo y valoracion del semen. In: Evans G and Maxwell CW (Ed.), Inseminacion artificial de ovejas y cabras, Acribia SA, Zaragoza, Espana pp. 95-107.
  11. Gardon JC, Rodriques JA and Gadea J. 2006. Addition of reduced glutathione to thawing medium improved the sperm motility and reduced ros generation in frozen ovine and caprine spermatozoa. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 18:155-155.
  12. Herman HA, Mitchell JH and Doak GA. 1994. Extender and extension of semen. In: Herman HA (Ed.), The Artificial Insemination and Embryo Transfer of Dairy and Beef Cattle. Interstate Publishers, Inc. Danville, Illions, pp. 101-116.
  13. Hidalgo M, Rodriguez I and Dorado J. 2006. Influence of staining and sampling procedures on goat sperm morphometry using sperm class analyzer. Theriogenology 66:996-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.02.039
  14. Holt WV, Abaigar T and Jabbour HN. 1996. Oestrus synchronization, semen preservation and artificial insemination in the Mohor Gazelle (Gazella dama mhorr) for the establishment of a Genome Resource Bank Programme. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 8:1215-1222. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9961215
  15. Johnson C, Jacobs J and Walker R. 1991. Diagnosis and control of Brucella canis in kennel situations. Morphology-stain induced spermatozoal abnormalities. In: Proc. Soc. Therio. pp. 236-239.
  16. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmonn KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF and Oehninger S. 1988. Predicting value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 49:112-117.
  17. Lagerlof N. 1934. Morphologische Untersuchungen uber Veranderungen im Spermabild und in den Hoden bei Bullen mit verminderter oder aufgehobener Fertilitat (Researches concernoing morphologic changes in semen picture and the testicles of sterile and sub fertile bulls). Acta Path. Microbiol. Scand. Suppl. 19 thesis, Stockholm.
  18. Ostermeier GC, Sargeant GA, Yandell BS, Evension DP and Parrish JJ. 2001. Relationship of bull fertility to sperm nuclear shape. J. Androl. 22:595-603.
  19. Pellicer-Rubio MT, Magallon T and Combarnous Y. 1997. Deterioration of goat sperm viability in milk extenders is due to a bulbourethral 60-kilodaltonglycoprotein with triglyceride lipase activity. Biol. Reprod. 57:1023-1031. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod57.5.1023
  20. Peterson K, Kappen MA, Ursem PJ, Nothling JO, Colenbrander B and Gadella BM. 2007. Microscopic and flow cytometric semen assessment of Dutch AI-bucks: Effect of semen processing procedures and their correlation to fertility. Theriogenology 67:863-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.11.003
  21. Purdy PH. 2006. A review on goat sperm cryopreservation. Sm. Rumin. Res. 63:215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.02.015
  22. Randel RD. 1994. Reproductive characteristics of the Brahman and Brahman based bulls. In: Fields MJ and Sand RS (Ed.), Factors Affecting Calf Crop, CRC Press Boca Raton, F.L., pp. 331-344.
  23. Rasband WS. 2006. Image J. US National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA 2006; http://rssb.info.nih.gov/ij/.
  24. Ritar AJ and Salamon S. 1991. Effects of month of collection, method of processing, concentration of egg yolk and duration of frozen storage on viability of Angora goat spermatozoa. Sm. Rumin. Res. 4:29-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(91)90050-Z
  25. Rodriguez-Martinez H and Barth AD. 2007. In vitro evaluation of sperm quality related to in vivo function and fertility. Soc. Reprod. Fert. Suppl. 64:39-54.
  26. Saacke RG, Nadir S and Nebel RL. 1994. Relationship of semen quality to sperm transport, fertilization, and embryo quality in ruminants. Theriogenology 41:45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(05)80047-0
  27. Salamon S and Maxwell WM. 2000. Storage of ram semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 62:77-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00155-X
  28. Salamon S and Maxwell WMC. 1995. Frozen storage of ram semen: II. Causes of low fertility after cervical insemination and methods of improvement. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 38:1-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(94)01328-J
  29. Sekoni VO and Gustafsson BK. 1987. Seasonal variation in the incidence of sperm morphological abnormalities in dairy bull regularly used for artificial insemination. Br. Vet. J. 143:312-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(87)90064-9
  30. Shamsuddin M and Rodriguez-Martinez H. 1994. A simple non traumatic culture method for the selection of spermatozoa for in vitro fertilization in the bovine. Anim. Reprdo. Sci. 36:51-75.
  31. Shamsuddin M, Amiri Y and Bhuiya MMU. 2000. Characteristics of buck semen with regard to ejaculation number, collection intervals, dilution and preservation periods. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 35:53-57. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2000.00199.x
  32. Shamsuddin M, Rodrigues-Martinez H and Larson B 1993. Fertilizing capacity of bovine spermatozoa select after swim-up in hyaluronic acid containing medium. Reprod. Fert. Dev. 5:307-315. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9930307
  33. Shanis BF, Chek JH and Bollendorf A. 1989. Interpretation and misinterpretation of semen parameters. Arch. Androl. 23:213- 217. https://doi.org/10.3109/01485018908986844
  34. Siddiqui MAR. 2008. Laboratory tests to predict bull fertility and the value of sperm nuclear shape analysis. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Surgery and Obstetrics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh. pp. 1-108.
  35. Soderquist L, Janson L, Larsson K and Einarsson S. 1991. Sperm morphology and fertility in AI bulls. Zent. Vet. A. 38:534-543.
  36. Soderquist L. 1991. Sperm characteristics and fertility in dairy AI bulls. PhD Thesis, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty Veterinary Medicine, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  37. Sundaramman MN, Thangaraju P and Edwin MJ. 2002. Age related changes in testes size of Jersey bulls and its effects on semen production traits. Ind. J. Anim. Sci. 72:567-568.
  38. Watson PF. 2000. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 60:481-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00099-3
  39. Williams WW. 1920. Technique of collecting semen for laboratory examination with a review of several diseased bulls. Com. Vet. 10:87-94.
  40. Wurgau T. 1986. The significance of tertiary abnormalities for the evaluation of sperm morphology. Thesis: Tierarztliche Fskultet, Ludwing Maximalians Universitat Munchen, German Federal Republic.